Cargando…
HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study
Long term outcome of ablation-assisted hepatic resection is unclear for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study was scheduled to compare the outcome of Habib 4X ablation assisted resection (Habib group) with clamp-crush resection (CC group) for HCC. In this study, we retrospectively enro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965468 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13906 |
_version_ | 1782515403333828608 |
---|---|
author | Qiu, Jiliang Lu, Weiqun Yu, Nanrong Yang, Guohua Li, Yi Huang, Zhiliang Li, Jianchang Li, Kefei Xu, Houwei Chen, Shicai Zeng, Xiang Liu, Haiying |
author_facet | Qiu, Jiliang Lu, Weiqun Yu, Nanrong Yang, Guohua Li, Yi Huang, Zhiliang Li, Jianchang Li, Kefei Xu, Houwei Chen, Shicai Zeng, Xiang Liu, Haiying |
author_sort | Qiu, Jiliang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Long term outcome of ablation-assisted hepatic resection is unclear for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study was scheduled to compare the outcome of Habib 4X ablation assisted resection (Habib group) with clamp-crush resection (CC group) for HCC. In this study, we retrospectively enrolled 81 patients from the Habib group and 103 patients from the CC group. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a propensity score matching (PSM) method. Compared with the CC group, the Habib group had higher levels of γ-glutamyltransferase (P=0.044) and albumin (P=0.001), larger tumor sizes (P=0.007), shorter operation times (P=0.001), less blood loss (P=0.005), and less blood transfusions (P=0.038). There were no significant differences in complications (P=0.310), recurrence-free survival rates (RFS, P=0.112), or overall survival rates (OS, P=0.203) between the two groups. For the 67 patient pairs selected from the PSM analysis, the Habib group had better RFS and OS (P=0.033 and P=0.014, respectively). A Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that Habib-assisted resection was an independent factor for RFS and OS (P=0.008 and P=0.016, respectively). Furthermore, for the 42 patients with central and large tumors, the Habib group had better RFS and OS than the CC group (P=0.035 and P=0.038, respectively). However, the differences of RFS and OS (P=0.117 and P=0.126, respectively) were not significant among 92 patients with peripheral or small tumors. Hence, Habib(TM) 4X-assisted resection is safe and provides better survival for HCC patients, particularly those with central and large tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5354825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53548252017-04-24 HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study Qiu, Jiliang Lu, Weiqun Yu, Nanrong Yang, Guohua Li, Yi Huang, Zhiliang Li, Jianchang Li, Kefei Xu, Houwei Chen, Shicai Zeng, Xiang Liu, Haiying Oncotarget Research Paper Long term outcome of ablation-assisted hepatic resection is unclear for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study was scheduled to compare the outcome of Habib 4X ablation assisted resection (Habib group) with clamp-crush resection (CC group) for HCC. In this study, we retrospectively enrolled 81 patients from the Habib group and 103 patients from the CC group. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a propensity score matching (PSM) method. Compared with the CC group, the Habib group had higher levels of γ-glutamyltransferase (P=0.044) and albumin (P=0.001), larger tumor sizes (P=0.007), shorter operation times (P=0.001), less blood loss (P=0.005), and less blood transfusions (P=0.038). There were no significant differences in complications (P=0.310), recurrence-free survival rates (RFS, P=0.112), or overall survival rates (OS, P=0.203) between the two groups. For the 67 patient pairs selected from the PSM analysis, the Habib group had better RFS and OS (P=0.033 and P=0.014, respectively). A Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that Habib-assisted resection was an independent factor for RFS and OS (P=0.008 and P=0.016, respectively). Furthermore, for the 42 patients with central and large tumors, the Habib group had better RFS and OS than the CC group (P=0.035 and P=0.038, respectively). However, the differences of RFS and OS (P=0.117 and P=0.126, respectively) were not significant among 92 patients with peripheral or small tumors. Hence, Habib(TM) 4X-assisted resection is safe and provides better survival for HCC patients, particularly those with central and large tumors. Impact Journals LLC 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5354825/ /pubmed/27965468 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13906 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Qiu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Qiu, Jiliang Lu, Weiqun Yu, Nanrong Yang, Guohua Li, Yi Huang, Zhiliang Li, Jianchang Li, Kefei Xu, Houwei Chen, Shicai Zeng, Xiang Liu, Haiying HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study |
title | HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study |
title_full | HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study |
title_fullStr | HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study |
title_full_unstemmed | HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study |
title_short | HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study |
title_sort | habibtm 4x-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965468 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiujiliang habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT luweiqun habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT yunanrong habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT yangguohua habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT liyi habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT huangzhiliang habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT lijianchang habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT likefei habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT xuhouwei habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT chenshicai habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT zengxiang habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy AT liuhaiying habibtm4xassistedresectionversusclampcrushresectionforhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensitymatchingstudy |