Cargando…
Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
The aim of this work was to investigate correlations between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates. A total of 20 patients (10 prostate cases and 10 head and neck cases, H&N) were retrospectively selected. For each patient, both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27690300 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12279 |
_version_ | 1782515431341293568 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jung-in Choi, Chang Heon Wu, Hong-Gyun Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Kyubo Park, Jong Min |
author_facet | Kim, Jung-in Choi, Chang Heon Wu, Hong-Gyun Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Kyubo Park, Jong Min |
author_sort | Kim, Jung-in |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this work was to investigate correlations between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates. A total of 20 patients (10 prostate cases and 10 head and neck cases, H&N) were retrospectively selected. For each patient, both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. For each plan, 2D gamma evaluation with radiochromic films and quasi-3D gamma evaluation with fluence measurements were performed with both 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria. Gamma passing rates were grouped together according to delivery techniques and treatment sites. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. Statistically significant difference was observed between delivery techniques only in the quasi-3D gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm. Statistically significant differences were observed between treatment sites in the 2D gamma passing rates (differences of less than 8%). No statistically significant correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates except the VMAT group and the group including both IMRT and VMAT with 3%/3 mm (r = 0.564 with p = 0.012 for theVMAT group and r = 0.372 with p = 0.020 for the group including both IMRT and VMAT), however, those were not strong. No strong correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5354922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53549222017-04-24 Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy Kim, Jung-in Choi, Chang Heon Wu, Hong-Gyun Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Kyubo Park, Jong Min Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper The aim of this work was to investigate correlations between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates. A total of 20 patients (10 prostate cases and 10 head and neck cases, H&N) were retrospectively selected. For each patient, both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. For each plan, 2D gamma evaluation with radiochromic films and quasi-3D gamma evaluation with fluence measurements were performed with both 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria. Gamma passing rates were grouped together according to delivery techniques and treatment sites. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. Statistically significant difference was observed between delivery techniques only in the quasi-3D gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm. Statistically significant differences were observed between treatment sites in the 2D gamma passing rates (differences of less than 8%). No statistically significant correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates except the VMAT group and the group including both IMRT and VMAT with 3%/3 mm (r = 0.564 with p = 0.012 for theVMAT group and r = 0.372 with p = 0.020 for the group including both IMRT and VMAT), however, those were not strong. No strong correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. Impact Journals LLC 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5354922/ /pubmed/27690300 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12279 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Kim, Jung-in Choi, Chang Heon Wu, Hong-Gyun Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Kyubo Park, Jong Min Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy |
title | Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy |
title_full | Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy |
title_fullStr | Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy |
title_short | Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy |
title_sort | correlation analysis between 2d and quasi-3d gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27690300 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjungin correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy AT choichangheon correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy AT wuhonggyun correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy AT kimjinho correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy AT kimkyubo correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy AT parkjongmin correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy |