Cargando…

Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy

The aim of this work was to investigate correlations between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates. A total of 20 patients (10 prostate cases and 10 head and neck cases, H&N) were retrospectively selected. For each patient, both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jung-in, Choi, Chang Heon, Wu, Hong-Gyun, Kim, Jin Ho, Kim, Kyubo, Park, Jong Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27690300
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12279
_version_ 1782515431341293568
author Kim, Jung-in
Choi, Chang Heon
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Kyubo
Park, Jong Min
author_facet Kim, Jung-in
Choi, Chang Heon
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Kyubo
Park, Jong Min
author_sort Kim, Jung-in
collection PubMed
description The aim of this work was to investigate correlations between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates. A total of 20 patients (10 prostate cases and 10 head and neck cases, H&N) were retrospectively selected. For each patient, both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. For each plan, 2D gamma evaluation with radiochromic films and quasi-3D gamma evaluation with fluence measurements were performed with both 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria. Gamma passing rates were grouped together according to delivery techniques and treatment sites. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. Statistically significant difference was observed between delivery techniques only in the quasi-3D gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm. Statistically significant differences were observed between treatment sites in the 2D gamma passing rates (differences of less than 8%). No statistically significant correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates except the VMAT group and the group including both IMRT and VMAT with 3%/3 mm (r = 0.564 with p = 0.012 for theVMAT group and r = 0.372 with p = 0.020 for the group including both IMRT and VMAT), however, those were not strong. No strong correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5354922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53549222017-04-24 Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy Kim, Jung-in Choi, Chang Heon Wu, Hong-Gyun Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Kyubo Park, Jong Min Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper The aim of this work was to investigate correlations between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates. A total of 20 patients (10 prostate cases and 10 head and neck cases, H&N) were retrospectively selected. For each patient, both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. For each plan, 2D gamma evaluation with radiochromic films and quasi-3D gamma evaluation with fluence measurements were performed with both 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria. Gamma passing rates were grouped together according to delivery techniques and treatment sites. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. Statistically significant difference was observed between delivery techniques only in the quasi-3D gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm. Statistically significant differences were observed between treatment sites in the 2D gamma passing rates (differences of less than 8%). No statistically significant correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates except the VMAT group and the group including both IMRT and VMAT with 3%/3 mm (r = 0.564 with p = 0.012 for theVMAT group and r = 0.372 with p = 0.020 for the group including both IMRT and VMAT), however, those were not strong. No strong correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. Impact Journals LLC 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5354922/ /pubmed/27690300 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12279 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Kim, Jung-in
Choi, Chang Heon
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Kyubo
Park, Jong Min
Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
title Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_full Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_fullStr Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_full_unstemmed Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_short Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_sort correlation analysis between 2d and quasi-3d gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27690300
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12279
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjungin correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT choichangheon correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT wuhonggyun correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT kimjinho correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT kimkyubo correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT parkjongmin correlationanalysisbetween2dandquasi3dgammaevaluationsforbothintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy