Cargando…

The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer was reported as advantageous compared to laparotomy resection. However, this finding remains controversial, especially given the two recent randomized controlled trials published on The Journal of the American Medical Association (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Jiabin, Feng, Xingyu, Yang, Zifeng, Hu, Weixian, Luo, Yuwen, Li, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28038460
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14215
_version_ 1782515450366656512
author Zheng, Jiabin
Feng, Xingyu
Yang, Zifeng
Hu, Weixian
Luo, Yuwen
Li, Yong
author_facet Zheng, Jiabin
Feng, Xingyu
Yang, Zifeng
Hu, Weixian
Luo, Yuwen
Li, Yong
author_sort Zheng, Jiabin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer was reported as advantageous compared to laparotomy resection. However, this finding remains controversial, especially given the two recent randomized controlled trials published on The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis that compares the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. DATA SOURCE: To identify clinical trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer published by August 2016, we searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Springer Link and Clinicaltrials.gov databases by combining various key words. Data were extracted from every identified study to perform a meta-analysis using the Review Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 43 articles from 38 studies with a total of 13408 patients were included. Although laparoscopic radical rectectomy increased operation time (MD = 37.23, 95% CI: 28.88 to 45.57, P < 0.0001), it can significantly decrease the blood loss (MD = –143.13, 95% CI: –183.48 to –102.78, P < 0.0001), time to first bowel movement (MD = –0.97, 95% CI: –1.35 to –0.59, P < 0.0001), length of hospital stay (MD = –2.40, 95% CI: –3.10 to –1.70, P < 0.0001), postoperative complications (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.86, P < 0.0001), mortality (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.57, P < 0.0001) and the CRM positive rate (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.75, P < 0.0001). No significant difference were noted between the groups regarding intraoperative complications, TME completeness and harvesting of lymph nodes. Regarding the long-term survival data, the laparoscopic group was not inferior to laparotomy. Some pooled data, such as 3-year DFS, 5-year OS and 5-year local recurrence were even superior for the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: Given the definite benefits in short-term outcomes and trending benefits in long-term outcomes that were observed, we recommend laparoscopic surgery be used for rectal cancer resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5355048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53550482017-04-15 The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zheng, Jiabin Feng, Xingyu Yang, Zifeng Hu, Weixian Luo, Yuwen Li, Yong Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer was reported as advantageous compared to laparotomy resection. However, this finding remains controversial, especially given the two recent randomized controlled trials published on The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis that compares the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. DATA SOURCE: To identify clinical trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer published by August 2016, we searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Springer Link and Clinicaltrials.gov databases by combining various key words. Data were extracted from every identified study to perform a meta-analysis using the Review Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 43 articles from 38 studies with a total of 13408 patients were included. Although laparoscopic radical rectectomy increased operation time (MD = 37.23, 95% CI: 28.88 to 45.57, P < 0.0001), it can significantly decrease the blood loss (MD = –143.13, 95% CI: –183.48 to –102.78, P < 0.0001), time to first bowel movement (MD = –0.97, 95% CI: –1.35 to –0.59, P < 0.0001), length of hospital stay (MD = –2.40, 95% CI: –3.10 to –1.70, P < 0.0001), postoperative complications (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.86, P < 0.0001), mortality (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.57, P < 0.0001) and the CRM positive rate (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.75, P < 0.0001). No significant difference were noted between the groups regarding intraoperative complications, TME completeness and harvesting of lymph nodes. Regarding the long-term survival data, the laparoscopic group was not inferior to laparotomy. Some pooled data, such as 3-year DFS, 5-year OS and 5-year local recurrence were even superior for the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: Given the definite benefits in short-term outcomes and trending benefits in long-term outcomes that were observed, we recommend laparoscopic surgery be used for rectal cancer resection. Impact Journals LLC 2016-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5355048/ /pubmed/28038460 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14215 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Zheng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zheng, Jiabin
Feng, Xingyu
Yang, Zifeng
Hu, Weixian
Luo, Yuwen
Li, Yong
The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28038460
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14215
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengjiabin thecomprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengxingyu thecomprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangzifeng thecomprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huweixian thecomprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luoyuwen thecomprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyong thecomprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengjiabin comprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengxingyu comprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangzifeng comprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huweixian comprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luoyuwen comprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyong comprehensivetherapeuticeffectsofrectalsurgeryarebetterinlaparoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis