Cargando…
Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies
Predation is an interaction during which an organism kills and feeds on another organism. Past and current interest in studying predation in terrestrial habitats has yielded a number of methods to assess invertebrate predation events in terrestrial ecosystems. We provide a decision tree to select ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2791 |
_version_ | 1782515490210447360 |
---|---|
author | Birkhofer, Klaus Bylund, Helena Dalin, Peter Ferlian, Olga Gagic, Vesna Hambäck, Peter A. Klapwijk, Maartje Mestre, Laia Roubinet, Eve Schroeder, Martin Stenberg, Johan A. Porcel, Mario Björkman, Christer Jonsson, Mattias |
author_facet | Birkhofer, Klaus Bylund, Helena Dalin, Peter Ferlian, Olga Gagic, Vesna Hambäck, Peter A. Klapwijk, Maartje Mestre, Laia Roubinet, Eve Schroeder, Martin Stenberg, Johan A. Porcel, Mario Björkman, Christer Jonsson, Mattias |
author_sort | Birkhofer, Klaus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Predation is an interaction during which an organism kills and feeds on another organism. Past and current interest in studying predation in terrestrial habitats has yielded a number of methods to assess invertebrate predation events in terrestrial ecosystems. We provide a decision tree to select appropriate methods for individual studies. For each method, we then present a short introduction, key examples for applications, advantages and disadvantages, and an outlook to future refinements. Video and, to a lesser extent, live observations are recommended in studies that address behavioral aspects of predator–prey interactions or focus on per capita predation rates. Cage studies are only appropriate for small predator species, but often suffer from a bias via cage effects. The use of prey baits or analyses of prey remains are cheaper than other methods and have the potential to provide per capita predation estimates. These advantages often come at the cost of low taxonomic specificity. Molecular methods provide reliable estimates at a fine level of taxonomic resolution and are free of observer bias for predator species of any size. However, the current PCR‐based methods lack the ability to estimate predation rates for individual predators and are more expensive than other methods. Molecular and stable isotope analyses are best suited to address systems that include a range of predator and prey species. Our review of methods strongly suggests that while in many cases individual methods are sufficient to study specific questions, combinations of methods hold a high potential to provide more holistic insights into predation events. This review presents an overview of methods to researchers that are new to the field or to particular aspects of predation ecology and provides recommendations toward the subset of suitable methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5355183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53551832017-03-22 Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies Birkhofer, Klaus Bylund, Helena Dalin, Peter Ferlian, Olga Gagic, Vesna Hambäck, Peter A. Klapwijk, Maartje Mestre, Laia Roubinet, Eve Schroeder, Martin Stenberg, Johan A. Porcel, Mario Björkman, Christer Jonsson, Mattias Ecol Evol Review Predation is an interaction during which an organism kills and feeds on another organism. Past and current interest in studying predation in terrestrial habitats has yielded a number of methods to assess invertebrate predation events in terrestrial ecosystems. We provide a decision tree to select appropriate methods for individual studies. For each method, we then present a short introduction, key examples for applications, advantages and disadvantages, and an outlook to future refinements. Video and, to a lesser extent, live observations are recommended in studies that address behavioral aspects of predator–prey interactions or focus on per capita predation rates. Cage studies are only appropriate for small predator species, but often suffer from a bias via cage effects. The use of prey baits or analyses of prey remains are cheaper than other methods and have the potential to provide per capita predation estimates. These advantages often come at the cost of low taxonomic specificity. Molecular methods provide reliable estimates at a fine level of taxonomic resolution and are free of observer bias for predator species of any size. However, the current PCR‐based methods lack the ability to estimate predation rates for individual predators and are more expensive than other methods. Molecular and stable isotope analyses are best suited to address systems that include a range of predator and prey species. Our review of methods strongly suggests that while in many cases individual methods are sufficient to study specific questions, combinations of methods hold a high potential to provide more holistic insights into predation events. This review presents an overview of methods to researchers that are new to the field or to particular aspects of predation ecology and provides recommendations toward the subset of suitable methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5355183/ /pubmed/28331601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2791 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Birkhofer, Klaus Bylund, Helena Dalin, Peter Ferlian, Olga Gagic, Vesna Hambäck, Peter A. Klapwijk, Maartje Mestre, Laia Roubinet, Eve Schroeder, Martin Stenberg, Johan A. Porcel, Mario Björkman, Christer Jonsson, Mattias Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies |
title | Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies |
title_full | Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies |
title_fullStr | Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies |
title_short | Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies |
title_sort | methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT birkhoferklaus methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT bylundhelena methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT dalinpeter methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT ferlianolga methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT gagicvesna methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT hambackpetera methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT klapwijkmaartje methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT mestrelaia methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT roubineteve methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT schroedermartin methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT stenbergjohana methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT porcelmario methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT bjorkmanchrister methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies AT jonssonmattias methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies |