Cargando…

Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies

Predation is an interaction during which an organism kills and feeds on another organism. Past and current interest in studying predation in terrestrial habitats has yielded a number of methods to assess invertebrate predation events in terrestrial ecosystems. We provide a decision tree to select ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birkhofer, Klaus, Bylund, Helena, Dalin, Peter, Ferlian, Olga, Gagic, Vesna, Hambäck, Peter A., Klapwijk, Maartje, Mestre, Laia, Roubinet, Eve, Schroeder, Martin, Stenberg, Johan A., Porcel, Mario, Björkman, Christer, Jonsson, Mattias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2791
_version_ 1782515490210447360
author Birkhofer, Klaus
Bylund, Helena
Dalin, Peter
Ferlian, Olga
Gagic, Vesna
Hambäck, Peter A.
Klapwijk, Maartje
Mestre, Laia
Roubinet, Eve
Schroeder, Martin
Stenberg, Johan A.
Porcel, Mario
Björkman, Christer
Jonsson, Mattias
author_facet Birkhofer, Klaus
Bylund, Helena
Dalin, Peter
Ferlian, Olga
Gagic, Vesna
Hambäck, Peter A.
Klapwijk, Maartje
Mestre, Laia
Roubinet, Eve
Schroeder, Martin
Stenberg, Johan A.
Porcel, Mario
Björkman, Christer
Jonsson, Mattias
author_sort Birkhofer, Klaus
collection PubMed
description Predation is an interaction during which an organism kills and feeds on another organism. Past and current interest in studying predation in terrestrial habitats has yielded a number of methods to assess invertebrate predation events in terrestrial ecosystems. We provide a decision tree to select appropriate methods for individual studies. For each method, we then present a short introduction, key examples for applications, advantages and disadvantages, and an outlook to future refinements. Video and, to a lesser extent, live observations are recommended in studies that address behavioral aspects of predator–prey interactions or focus on per capita predation rates. Cage studies are only appropriate for small predator species, but often suffer from a bias via cage effects. The use of prey baits or analyses of prey remains are cheaper than other methods and have the potential to provide per capita predation estimates. These advantages often come at the cost of low taxonomic specificity. Molecular methods provide reliable estimates at a fine level of taxonomic resolution and are free of observer bias for predator species of any size. However, the current PCR‐based methods lack the ability to estimate predation rates for individual predators and are more expensive than other methods. Molecular and stable isotope analyses are best suited to address systems that include a range of predator and prey species. Our review of methods strongly suggests that while in many cases individual methods are sufficient to study specific questions, combinations of methods hold a high potential to provide more holistic insights into predation events. This review presents an overview of methods to researchers that are new to the field or to particular aspects of predation ecology and provides recommendations toward the subset of suitable methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5355183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53551832017-03-22 Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies Birkhofer, Klaus Bylund, Helena Dalin, Peter Ferlian, Olga Gagic, Vesna Hambäck, Peter A. Klapwijk, Maartje Mestre, Laia Roubinet, Eve Schroeder, Martin Stenberg, Johan A. Porcel, Mario Björkman, Christer Jonsson, Mattias Ecol Evol Review Predation is an interaction during which an organism kills and feeds on another organism. Past and current interest in studying predation in terrestrial habitats has yielded a number of methods to assess invertebrate predation events in terrestrial ecosystems. We provide a decision tree to select appropriate methods for individual studies. For each method, we then present a short introduction, key examples for applications, advantages and disadvantages, and an outlook to future refinements. Video and, to a lesser extent, live observations are recommended in studies that address behavioral aspects of predator–prey interactions or focus on per capita predation rates. Cage studies are only appropriate for small predator species, but often suffer from a bias via cage effects. The use of prey baits or analyses of prey remains are cheaper than other methods and have the potential to provide per capita predation estimates. These advantages often come at the cost of low taxonomic specificity. Molecular methods provide reliable estimates at a fine level of taxonomic resolution and are free of observer bias for predator species of any size. However, the current PCR‐based methods lack the ability to estimate predation rates for individual predators and are more expensive than other methods. Molecular and stable isotope analyses are best suited to address systems that include a range of predator and prey species. Our review of methods strongly suggests that while in many cases individual methods are sufficient to study specific questions, combinations of methods hold a high potential to provide more holistic insights into predation events. This review presents an overview of methods to researchers that are new to the field or to particular aspects of predation ecology and provides recommendations toward the subset of suitable methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5355183/ /pubmed/28331601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2791 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Birkhofer, Klaus
Bylund, Helena
Dalin, Peter
Ferlian, Olga
Gagic, Vesna
Hambäck, Peter A.
Klapwijk, Maartje
Mestre, Laia
Roubinet, Eve
Schroeder, Martin
Stenberg, Johan A.
Porcel, Mario
Björkman, Christer
Jonsson, Mattias
Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies
title Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies
title_full Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies
title_fullStr Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies
title_full_unstemmed Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies
title_short Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies
title_sort methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2791
work_keys_str_mv AT birkhoferklaus methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT bylundhelena methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT dalinpeter methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT ferlianolga methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT gagicvesna methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT hambackpetera methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT klapwijkmaartje methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT mestrelaia methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT roubineteve methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT schroedermartin methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT stenbergjohana methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT porcelmario methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT bjorkmanchrister methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies
AT jonssonmattias methodstoidentifythepreyofinvertebratepredatorsinterrestrialfieldstudies