Cargando…

Environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks

Evidence for phenotypic plasticity in brain size and the size of different brain parts is widespread, but experimental investigations into this effect remain scarce and are usually conducted using individuals from a single population. As the costs and benefits of plasticity may differ among populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toli, Elisavet A., Noreikiene, Kristina, DeFaveri, Jacquelin, Merilä, Juha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2717
_version_ 1782515490543894528
author Toli, Elisavet A.
Noreikiene, Kristina
DeFaveri, Jacquelin
Merilä, Juha
author_facet Toli, Elisavet A.
Noreikiene, Kristina
DeFaveri, Jacquelin
Merilä, Juha
author_sort Toli, Elisavet A.
collection PubMed
description Evidence for phenotypic plasticity in brain size and the size of different brain parts is widespread, but experimental investigations into this effect remain scarce and are usually conducted using individuals from a single population. As the costs and benefits of plasticity may differ among populations, the extent of brain plasticity may also differ from one population to another. In a common garden experiment conducted with three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) originating from four different populations, we investigated whether environmental enrichment (aquaria provided with structural complexity) caused an increase in the brain size or size of different brain parts compared to controls (bare aquaria). We found no evidence for a positive effect of environmental enrichment on brain size or size of different brain parts in either of the sexes in any of the populations. However, in all populations, males had larger brains than females, and the degree of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in relative brain size ranged from 5.1 to 11.6% across the populations. Evidence was also found for genetically based differences in relative brain size among populations, as well as for plasticity in the size of different brain parts, as evidenced by consistent size differences among replicate blocks that differed in their temperature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5355184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53551842017-03-22 Environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks Toli, Elisavet A. Noreikiene, Kristina DeFaveri, Jacquelin Merilä, Juha Ecol Evol Original Research Evidence for phenotypic plasticity in brain size and the size of different brain parts is widespread, but experimental investigations into this effect remain scarce and are usually conducted using individuals from a single population. As the costs and benefits of plasticity may differ among populations, the extent of brain plasticity may also differ from one population to another. In a common garden experiment conducted with three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) originating from four different populations, we investigated whether environmental enrichment (aquaria provided with structural complexity) caused an increase in the brain size or size of different brain parts compared to controls (bare aquaria). We found no evidence for a positive effect of environmental enrichment on brain size or size of different brain parts in either of the sexes in any of the populations. However, in all populations, males had larger brains than females, and the degree of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in relative brain size ranged from 5.1 to 11.6% across the populations. Evidence was also found for genetically based differences in relative brain size among populations, as well as for plasticity in the size of different brain parts, as evidenced by consistent size differences among replicate blocks that differed in their temperature. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5355184/ /pubmed/28331580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2717 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Toli, Elisavet A.
Noreikiene, Kristina
DeFaveri, Jacquelin
Merilä, Juha
Environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks
title Environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks
title_full Environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks
title_fullStr Environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks
title_full_unstemmed Environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks
title_short Environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks
title_sort environmental enrichment, sexual dimorphism, and brain size in sticklebacks
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2717
work_keys_str_mv AT tolielisaveta environmentalenrichmentsexualdimorphismandbrainsizeinsticklebacks
AT noreikienekristina environmentalenrichmentsexualdimorphismandbrainsizeinsticklebacks
AT defaverijacquelin environmentalenrichmentsexualdimorphismandbrainsizeinsticklebacks
AT merilajuha environmentalenrichmentsexualdimorphismandbrainsizeinsticklebacks