Cargando…
Conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants
Static allometries determine how organ size scales in relation to body mass. The extent to which these allometric relationships are free to evolve, and how they differ among closely related species, has been debated extensively and remains unclear; changes in intercept appear common, but changes in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2695 |
_version_ | 1782515494332399616 |
---|---|
author | Perl, Craig D. Rossoni, Sergio Niven, Jeremy E. |
author_facet | Perl, Craig D. Rossoni, Sergio Niven, Jeremy E. |
author_sort | Perl, Craig D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Static allometries determine how organ size scales in relation to body mass. The extent to which these allometric relationships are free to evolve, and how they differ among closely related species, has been debated extensively and remains unclear; changes in intercept appear common, but changes in slope are far rarer. Here, we compare the scaling relationships that govern the structure of compound eyes of four closely related ant species from the genus Formica. Comparison among these species revealed changes in intercept but not slope in the allometric scaling relationships governing eye area, facet number, and mean facet diameter. Moreover, the scaling between facet diameter and number was conserved across all four species. In contrast, facet diameters from distinct regions of the compound eye differed in both intercept and slope within a single species and when comparing homologous regions among species. Thus, even when species are conservative in the scaling of whole organs, they can differ substantially in regional scaling within organs. This, at least partly, explains how species can produce organs that adhere to genus wide scaling relationships while still being able to invest differentially in particular regions of organs to produce specific features that match their ecology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5355196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53551962017-03-22 Conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants Perl, Craig D. Rossoni, Sergio Niven, Jeremy E. Ecol Evol Original Research Static allometries determine how organ size scales in relation to body mass. The extent to which these allometric relationships are free to evolve, and how they differ among closely related species, has been debated extensively and remains unclear; changes in intercept appear common, but changes in slope are far rarer. Here, we compare the scaling relationships that govern the structure of compound eyes of four closely related ant species from the genus Formica. Comparison among these species revealed changes in intercept but not slope in the allometric scaling relationships governing eye area, facet number, and mean facet diameter. Moreover, the scaling between facet diameter and number was conserved across all four species. In contrast, facet diameters from distinct regions of the compound eye differed in both intercept and slope within a single species and when comparing homologous regions among species. Thus, even when species are conservative in the scaling of whole organs, they can differ substantially in regional scaling within organs. This, at least partly, explains how species can produce organs that adhere to genus wide scaling relationships while still being able to invest differentially in particular regions of organs to produce specific features that match their ecology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5355196/ /pubmed/28331577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2695 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Perl, Craig D. Rossoni, Sergio Niven, Jeremy E. Conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants |
title | Conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants |
title_full | Conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants |
title_fullStr | Conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants |
title_full_unstemmed | Conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants |
title_short | Conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants |
title_sort | conservative whole‐organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related formica ants |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perlcraigd conservativewholeorganscalingcontrastswithhighlylabilesuborganscalingdifferencesamongcompoundeyesofcloselyrelatedformicaants AT rossonisergio conservativewholeorganscalingcontrastswithhighlylabilesuborganscalingdifferencesamongcompoundeyesofcloselyrelatedformicaants AT nivenjeremye conservativewholeorganscalingcontrastswithhighlylabilesuborganscalingdifferencesamongcompoundeyesofcloselyrelatedformicaants |