Cargando…

Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator

Identifying the primary causes affecting population densities and distribution of flagship species are necessary in developing sustainable management strategies for large carnivore conservation. We modeled drivers of spatial density of the common leopard (Panthera pardus) using a spatially explicit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramesh, Tharmalingam, Kalle, Riddhika, Rosenlund, Havard, Downs, Colleen T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2771
_version_ 1782515494617612288
author Ramesh, Tharmalingam
Kalle, Riddhika
Rosenlund, Havard
Downs, Colleen T.
author_facet Ramesh, Tharmalingam
Kalle, Riddhika
Rosenlund, Havard
Downs, Colleen T.
author_sort Ramesh, Tharmalingam
collection PubMed
description Identifying the primary causes affecting population densities and distribution of flagship species are necessary in developing sustainable management strategies for large carnivore conservation. We modeled drivers of spatial density of the common leopard (Panthera pardus) using a spatially explicit capture–recapture—Bayesian approach to understand their population dynamics in the Maputaland Conservation Unit, South Africa. We camera‐trapped leopards in four protected areas (PAs) of varying sizes and disturbance levels covering 198 camera stations. Ours is the first study to explore the effects of poaching level, abundance of prey species (small, medium, and large), competitors (lion Panthera leo and spotted hyenas Crocuta crocuta), and habitat on the spatial distribution of common leopard density. Twenty‐six male and 41 female leopards were individually identified and estimated leopard density ranged from 1.6 ± 0.62/100 km(2) (smallest PA—Ndumo) to 8.4 ± 1.03/100 km(2) (largest PA—western shores). Although dry forest thickets and plantation habitats largely represented the western shores, the plantation areas had extremely low leopard density compared to native forest. We found that leopard density increased in areas when low poaching levels/no poaching was recorded in dry forest thickets and with high abundance of medium‐sized prey, but decreased with increasing abundance of lion. Because local leopard populations are vulnerable to extinction, particularly in smaller PAs, the long‐term sustainability of leopard populations depend on developing appropriate management strategies that consider a combination of multiple factors to maintain their optimal habitats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5355197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53551972017-03-22 Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator Ramesh, Tharmalingam Kalle, Riddhika Rosenlund, Havard Downs, Colleen T. Ecol Evol Original Research Identifying the primary causes affecting population densities and distribution of flagship species are necessary in developing sustainable management strategies for large carnivore conservation. We modeled drivers of spatial density of the common leopard (Panthera pardus) using a spatially explicit capture–recapture—Bayesian approach to understand their population dynamics in the Maputaland Conservation Unit, South Africa. We camera‐trapped leopards in four protected areas (PAs) of varying sizes and disturbance levels covering 198 camera stations. Ours is the first study to explore the effects of poaching level, abundance of prey species (small, medium, and large), competitors (lion Panthera leo and spotted hyenas Crocuta crocuta), and habitat on the spatial distribution of common leopard density. Twenty‐six male and 41 female leopards were individually identified and estimated leopard density ranged from 1.6 ± 0.62/100 km(2) (smallest PA—Ndumo) to 8.4 ± 1.03/100 km(2) (largest PA—western shores). Although dry forest thickets and plantation habitats largely represented the western shores, the plantation areas had extremely low leopard density compared to native forest. We found that leopard density increased in areas when low poaching levels/no poaching was recorded in dry forest thickets and with high abundance of medium‐sized prey, but decreased with increasing abundance of lion. Because local leopard populations are vulnerable to extinction, particularly in smaller PAs, the long‐term sustainability of leopard populations depend on developing appropriate management strategies that consider a combination of multiple factors to maintain their optimal habitats. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5355197/ /pubmed/28331603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2771 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ramesh, Tharmalingam
Kalle, Riddhika
Rosenlund, Havard
Downs, Colleen T.
Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator
title Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator
title_full Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator
title_fullStr Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator
title_full_unstemmed Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator
title_short Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator
title_sort low leopard populations in protected areas of maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2771
work_keys_str_mv AT rameshtharmalingam lowleopardpopulationsinprotectedareasofmaputalandaconsequenceofpoachinghabitatconditionabundanceofpreyandatoppredator
AT kalleriddhika lowleopardpopulationsinprotectedareasofmaputalandaconsequenceofpoachinghabitatconditionabundanceofpreyandatoppredator
AT rosenlundhavard lowleopardpopulationsinprotectedareasofmaputalandaconsequenceofpoachinghabitatconditionabundanceofpreyandatoppredator
AT downscolleent lowleopardpopulationsinprotectedareasofmaputalandaconsequenceofpoachinghabitatconditionabundanceofpreyandatoppredator