Cargando…

Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess if the complex anatomy of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection can be accurately reproduced from a contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan into a three‐dimensional (3D) printed model. METHODS: Contrast‐enhanced cardiac CT scans from two pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Daniel, Squelch, Andrew, Sun, Zhonghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28134482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.212
_version_ 1782515546351206400
author Ho, Daniel
Squelch, Andrew
Sun, Zhonghua
author_facet Ho, Daniel
Squelch, Andrew
Sun, Zhonghua
author_sort Ho, Daniel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess if the complex anatomy of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection can be accurately reproduced from a contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan into a three‐dimensional (3D) printed model. METHODS: Contrast‐enhanced cardiac CT scans from two patients were post‐processed and produced as 3D printed thoracic aorta models of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. The transverse diameter was measured at five anatomical landmarks for both models, compared across three stages: the original contrast‐enhanced CT images, the stereolithography (STL) format computerised model prepared for 3D printing and the contrast‐enhanced CT of the 3D printed model. For the model with aortic dissection, measurements of the true and false lumen were taken and compared at two points on the descending aorta. RESULTS: Three‐dimensional printed models were generated with strong and flexible plastic material with successful replication of anatomical details of aortic structures and pathologies. The mean difference in transverse vessel diameter between the contrast‐enhanced CT images before and after 3D printing was 1.0 and 1.2 mm, for the first and second models respectively (standard deviation: 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm). Additionally, for the second model, the mean luminal diameter difference between the 3D printed model and CT images was 0.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Encouraging results were achieved with regards to reproducing 3D models depicting aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Variances in vessel diameter measurement outside a standard deviation of 1 mm tolerance indicate further work is required into the assessment and accuracy of 3D model reproduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5355365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53553652017-03-22 Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing Ho, Daniel Squelch, Andrew Sun, Zhonghua J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess if the complex anatomy of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection can be accurately reproduced from a contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan into a three‐dimensional (3D) printed model. METHODS: Contrast‐enhanced cardiac CT scans from two patients were post‐processed and produced as 3D printed thoracic aorta models of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. The transverse diameter was measured at five anatomical landmarks for both models, compared across three stages: the original contrast‐enhanced CT images, the stereolithography (STL) format computerised model prepared for 3D printing and the contrast‐enhanced CT of the 3D printed model. For the model with aortic dissection, measurements of the true and false lumen were taken and compared at two points on the descending aorta. RESULTS: Three‐dimensional printed models were generated with strong and flexible plastic material with successful replication of anatomical details of aortic structures and pathologies. The mean difference in transverse vessel diameter between the contrast‐enhanced CT images before and after 3D printing was 1.0 and 1.2 mm, for the first and second models respectively (standard deviation: 1.0 mm and 0.9 mm). Additionally, for the second model, the mean luminal diameter difference between the 3D printed model and CT images was 0.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Encouraging results were achieved with regards to reproducing 3D models depicting aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Variances in vessel diameter measurement outside a standard deviation of 1 mm tolerance indicate further work is required into the assessment and accuracy of 3D model reproduction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-30 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5355365/ /pubmed/28134482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.212 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ho, Daniel
Squelch, Andrew
Sun, Zhonghua
Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_full Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_fullStr Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_full_unstemmed Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_short Modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3D printing
title_sort modelling of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection through 3d printing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28134482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.212
work_keys_str_mv AT hodaniel modellingofaorticaneurysmandaorticdissectionthrough3dprinting
AT squelchandrew modellingofaorticaneurysmandaorticdissectionthrough3dprinting
AT sunzhonghua modellingofaorticaneurysmandaorticdissectionthrough3dprinting