Cargando…
The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study
INTRODUCTION: New technology is continuously introduced in health care. The aim of this study was (1) to collect the opinions and experiences of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding the technology they use in their profession and (2) to acquire their views...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.207 |
_version_ | 1782515548004810752 |
---|---|
author | Aarts, Sil Cornelis, Forra Zevenboom, Yke Brokken, Patrick van de Griend, Nicole Spoorenberg, Miriam ten Bokum, Wendy Wouters, Eveline |
author_facet | Aarts, Sil Cornelis, Forra Zevenboom, Yke Brokken, Patrick van de Griend, Nicole Spoorenberg, Miriam ten Bokum, Wendy Wouters, Eveline |
author_sort | Aarts, Sil |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: New technology is continuously introduced in health care. The aim of this study was (1) to collect the opinions and experiences of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding the technology they use in their profession and (2) to acquire their views regarding the role of technology in their future practice. METHODS: Participants were recruited from five departments in five hospitals in The Netherlands. All radiographers, nuclear medicine therapists and radiation therapists who were working in these departments were invited to participate (n = 252). The following topics were discussed: technology in daily work, training in using technology and the role of technology in future practice. The recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using open and axial coding. RESULTS: A total of 52 participants (57.7% radiographer) were included, 19 men and 33 women (age range: 20–63). Four major themes emerged: (1) technology as an indispensable factor, (2) engagement, support and training in using technology, (3) transitions in work and (4) the radiographer of the future. All participants not only value technological developments to perform their occupations, but also aspects such as documentation and physical support. When asked about the future of their profession, contradictory answers were provided; while some expect less autonomy, others belief they will get more autonomy in their work. CONCLUSION: Technology plays a major role in all three occupations. All participants believe that technology should be in the best interests of patients. Being involved in the implementation of new technology is of utmost importance; courses and training, facilitated by the managers of the departments, should play a major role. Only when a constant dialogue exists between health care professionals and their managers, in which they discuss their experiences, needs and expectations, technology can be implemented in a safe and effective manner. This, in turn, might positively influence quality of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5355371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53553712017-03-22 The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study Aarts, Sil Cornelis, Forra Zevenboom, Yke Brokken, Patrick van de Griend, Nicole Spoorenberg, Miriam ten Bokum, Wendy Wouters, Eveline J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: New technology is continuously introduced in health care. The aim of this study was (1) to collect the opinions and experiences of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding the technology they use in their profession and (2) to acquire their views regarding the role of technology in their future practice. METHODS: Participants were recruited from five departments in five hospitals in The Netherlands. All radiographers, nuclear medicine therapists and radiation therapists who were working in these departments were invited to participate (n = 252). The following topics were discussed: technology in daily work, training in using technology and the role of technology in future practice. The recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using open and axial coding. RESULTS: A total of 52 participants (57.7% radiographer) were included, 19 men and 33 women (age range: 20–63). Four major themes emerged: (1) technology as an indispensable factor, (2) engagement, support and training in using technology, (3) transitions in work and (4) the radiographer of the future. All participants not only value technological developments to perform their occupations, but also aspects such as documentation and physical support. When asked about the future of their profession, contradictory answers were provided; while some expect less autonomy, others belief they will get more autonomy in their work. CONCLUSION: Technology plays a major role in all three occupations. All participants believe that technology should be in the best interests of patients. Being involved in the implementation of new technology is of utmost importance; courses and training, facilitated by the managers of the departments, should play a major role. Only when a constant dialogue exists between health care professionals and their managers, in which they discuss their experiences, needs and expectations, technology can be implemented in a safe and effective manner. This, in turn, might positively influence quality of care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-16 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5355371/ /pubmed/28303693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.207 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Aarts, Sil Cornelis, Forra Zevenboom, Yke Brokken, Patrick van de Griend, Nicole Spoorenberg, Miriam ten Bokum, Wendy Wouters, Eveline The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study |
title | The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study |
title_full | The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study |
title_short | The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study |
title_sort | opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aartssil theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT cornelisforra theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT zevenboomyke theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT brokkenpatrick theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT vandegriendnicole theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT spoorenbergmiriam theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT tenbokumwendy theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT wouterseveline theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT aartssil opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT cornelisforra opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT zevenboomyke opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT brokkenpatrick opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT vandegriendnicole opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT spoorenbergmiriam opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT tenbokumwendy opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT wouterseveline opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy |