Cargando…

The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION: New technology is continuously introduced in health care. The aim of this study was (1) to collect the opinions and experiences of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding the technology they use in their profession and (2) to acquire their views...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aarts, Sil, Cornelis, Forra, Zevenboom, Yke, Brokken, Patrick, van de Griend, Nicole, Spoorenberg, Miriam, ten Bokum, Wendy, Wouters, Eveline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.207
_version_ 1782515548004810752
author Aarts, Sil
Cornelis, Forra
Zevenboom, Yke
Brokken, Patrick
van de Griend, Nicole
Spoorenberg, Miriam
ten Bokum, Wendy
Wouters, Eveline
author_facet Aarts, Sil
Cornelis, Forra
Zevenboom, Yke
Brokken, Patrick
van de Griend, Nicole
Spoorenberg, Miriam
ten Bokum, Wendy
Wouters, Eveline
author_sort Aarts, Sil
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: New technology is continuously introduced in health care. The aim of this study was (1) to collect the opinions and experiences of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding the technology they use in their profession and (2) to acquire their views regarding the role of technology in their future practice. METHODS: Participants were recruited from five departments in five hospitals in The Netherlands. All radiographers, nuclear medicine therapists and radiation therapists who were working in these departments were invited to participate (n = 252). The following topics were discussed: technology in daily work, training in using technology and the role of technology in future practice. The recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using open and axial coding. RESULTS: A total of 52 participants (57.7% radiographer) were included, 19 men and 33 women (age range: 20–63). Four major themes emerged: (1) technology as an indispensable factor, (2) engagement, support and training in using technology, (3) transitions in work and (4) the radiographer of the future. All participants not only value technological developments to perform their occupations, but also aspects such as documentation and physical support. When asked about the future of their profession, contradictory answers were provided; while some expect less autonomy, others belief they will get more autonomy in their work. CONCLUSION: Technology plays a major role in all three occupations. All participants believe that technology should be in the best interests of patients. Being involved in the implementation of new technology is of utmost importance; courses and training, facilitated by the managers of the departments, should play a major role. Only when a constant dialogue exists between health care professionals and their managers, in which they discuss their experiences, needs and expectations, technology can be implemented in a safe and effective manner. This, in turn, might positively influence quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5355371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53553712017-03-22 The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study Aarts, Sil Cornelis, Forra Zevenboom, Yke Brokken, Patrick van de Griend, Nicole Spoorenberg, Miriam ten Bokum, Wendy Wouters, Eveline J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: New technology is continuously introduced in health care. The aim of this study was (1) to collect the opinions and experiences of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding the technology they use in their profession and (2) to acquire their views regarding the role of technology in their future practice. METHODS: Participants were recruited from five departments in five hospitals in The Netherlands. All radiographers, nuclear medicine therapists and radiation therapists who were working in these departments were invited to participate (n = 252). The following topics were discussed: technology in daily work, training in using technology and the role of technology in future practice. The recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using open and axial coding. RESULTS: A total of 52 participants (57.7% radiographer) were included, 19 men and 33 women (age range: 20–63). Four major themes emerged: (1) technology as an indispensable factor, (2) engagement, support and training in using technology, (3) transitions in work and (4) the radiographer of the future. All participants not only value technological developments to perform their occupations, but also aspects such as documentation and physical support. When asked about the future of their profession, contradictory answers were provided; while some expect less autonomy, others belief they will get more autonomy in their work. CONCLUSION: Technology plays a major role in all three occupations. All participants believe that technology should be in the best interests of patients. Being involved in the implementation of new technology is of utmost importance; courses and training, facilitated by the managers of the departments, should play a major role. Only when a constant dialogue exists between health care professionals and their managers, in which they discuss their experiences, needs and expectations, technology can be implemented in a safe and effective manner. This, in turn, might positively influence quality of care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-16 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5355371/ /pubmed/28303693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.207 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Aarts, Sil
Cornelis, Forra
Zevenboom, Yke
Brokken, Patrick
van de Griend, Nicole
Spoorenberg, Miriam
ten Bokum, Wendy
Wouters, Eveline
The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study
title The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study
title_full The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study
title_fullStr The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study
title_short The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study
title_sort opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5355371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.207
work_keys_str_mv AT aartssil theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT cornelisforra theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT zevenboomyke theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT brokkenpatrick theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT vandegriendnicole theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT spoorenbergmiriam theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT tenbokumwendy theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT wouterseveline theopinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT aartssil opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT cornelisforra opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT zevenboomyke opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT brokkenpatrick opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT vandegriendnicole opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT spoorenbergmiriam opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT tenbokumwendy opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy
AT wouterseveline opinionsofradiographersnuclearmedicinetechnologistsandradiationtherapistsregardingtechnologyinhealthcareaqualitativestudy