Cargando…

Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age

AIM: To provide descriptive figures for infant distress and associated parenting at night in normal London home environments during the first three months of age. BACKGROUND: Most western infants develop long night-time sleep periods by four months of age. However, 30% of infants in many countries s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: St James-Roberts, Ian, Roberts, Marion, Hovish, Kimberly, Owen, Charlie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5356193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000293
_version_ 1782515772160999424
author St James-Roberts, Ian
Roberts, Marion
Hovish, Kimberly
Owen, Charlie
author_facet St James-Roberts, Ian
Roberts, Marion
Hovish, Kimberly
Owen, Charlie
author_sort St James-Roberts, Ian
collection PubMed
description AIM: To provide descriptive figures for infant distress and associated parenting at night in normal London home environments during the first three months of age. BACKGROUND: Most western infants develop long night-time sleep periods by four months of age. However, 30% of infants in many countries sleep for short periods and cry out on waking in the night: the most common type of infant sleep behaviour problem. Preventive interventions may help families and improve services. There is evidence that ‘limit-setting’ parenting, which is common in western cultures, supports the development of settled infant night-time behaviour. However, a recent review has challenged this and argued that this form of parenting risks distressing infants. This study describes limit-setting parenting as practiced in London, compares it with ‘infant-cued’ parenting and measures the associated infant distress. METHODS: Longitudinal infrared video, diary and questionnaire observations comparing a General-Community (n=101) group and subgroups with a Bed-Sharing (n=19) group on measures of infant and parenting behaviours at night. FINDINGS: General-Community parents took longer to detect and respond to infant waking and signalling, and to begin feeding, compared with the highly infant-cued care provided by Bed-Sharing parents. The average latency in General-Community parents’ responding to infant night-time waking was 3.5 min, during which infants fuss/cried for around 1 min. Compared with Bed-Sharing parenting, General-Community parenting was associated with increased infant distress of around 30 min/night at two weeks, reducing to 12 min/night by three months of age. However, differences in infant distress between General-Community subgroups adopting limit-setting versus infant-cued parenting were not large or statistically significant at any age. The figures provide descriptive evidence about limit-setting parenting which may counter some doubts about this form of parenting and help parents and professionals to make choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5356193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53561932017-03-27 Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age St James-Roberts, Ian Roberts, Marion Hovish, Kimberly Owen, Charlie Prim Health Care Res Dev Research AIM: To provide descriptive figures for infant distress and associated parenting at night in normal London home environments during the first three months of age. BACKGROUND: Most western infants develop long night-time sleep periods by four months of age. However, 30% of infants in many countries sleep for short periods and cry out on waking in the night: the most common type of infant sleep behaviour problem. Preventive interventions may help families and improve services. There is evidence that ‘limit-setting’ parenting, which is common in western cultures, supports the development of settled infant night-time behaviour. However, a recent review has challenged this and argued that this form of parenting risks distressing infants. This study describes limit-setting parenting as practiced in London, compares it with ‘infant-cued’ parenting and measures the associated infant distress. METHODS: Longitudinal infrared video, diary and questionnaire observations comparing a General-Community (n=101) group and subgroups with a Bed-Sharing (n=19) group on measures of infant and parenting behaviours at night. FINDINGS: General-Community parents took longer to detect and respond to infant waking and signalling, and to begin feeding, compared with the highly infant-cued care provided by Bed-Sharing parents. The average latency in General-Community parents’ responding to infant night-time waking was 3.5 min, during which infants fuss/cried for around 1 min. Compared with Bed-Sharing parenting, General-Community parenting was associated with increased infant distress of around 30 min/night at two weeks, reducing to 12 min/night by three months of age. However, differences in infant distress between General-Community subgroups adopting limit-setting versus infant-cued parenting were not large or statistically significant at any age. The figures provide descriptive evidence about limit-setting parenting which may counter some doubts about this form of parenting and help parents and professionals to make choices. Cambridge University Press 2016-09-09 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5356193/ /pubmed/27609027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000293 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
St James-Roberts, Ian
Roberts, Marion
Hovish, Kimberly
Owen, Charlie
Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age
title Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age
title_full Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age
title_fullStr Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age
title_full_unstemmed Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age
title_short Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age
title_sort descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5356193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000293
work_keys_str_mv AT stjamesrobertsian descriptivefiguresfordifferencesinparentingandinfantnighttimedistressinthefirstthreemonthsofage
AT robertsmarion descriptivefiguresfordifferencesinparentingandinfantnighttimedistressinthefirstthreemonthsofage
AT hovishkimberly descriptivefiguresfordifferencesinparentingandinfantnighttimedistressinthefirstthreemonthsofage
AT owencharlie descriptivefiguresfordifferencesinparentingandinfantnighttimedistressinthefirstthreemonthsofage