Cargando…
Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age
AIM: To provide descriptive figures for infant distress and associated parenting at night in normal London home environments during the first three months of age. BACKGROUND: Most western infants develop long night-time sleep periods by four months of age. However, 30% of infants in many countries s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5356193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000293 |
_version_ | 1782515772160999424 |
---|---|
author | St James-Roberts, Ian Roberts, Marion Hovish, Kimberly Owen, Charlie |
author_facet | St James-Roberts, Ian Roberts, Marion Hovish, Kimberly Owen, Charlie |
author_sort | St James-Roberts, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To provide descriptive figures for infant distress and associated parenting at night in normal London home environments during the first three months of age. BACKGROUND: Most western infants develop long night-time sleep periods by four months of age. However, 30% of infants in many countries sleep for short periods and cry out on waking in the night: the most common type of infant sleep behaviour problem. Preventive interventions may help families and improve services. There is evidence that ‘limit-setting’ parenting, which is common in western cultures, supports the development of settled infant night-time behaviour. However, a recent review has challenged this and argued that this form of parenting risks distressing infants. This study describes limit-setting parenting as practiced in London, compares it with ‘infant-cued’ parenting and measures the associated infant distress. METHODS: Longitudinal infrared video, diary and questionnaire observations comparing a General-Community (n=101) group and subgroups with a Bed-Sharing (n=19) group on measures of infant and parenting behaviours at night. FINDINGS: General-Community parents took longer to detect and respond to infant waking and signalling, and to begin feeding, compared with the highly infant-cued care provided by Bed-Sharing parents. The average latency in General-Community parents’ responding to infant night-time waking was 3.5 min, during which infants fuss/cried for around 1 min. Compared with Bed-Sharing parenting, General-Community parenting was associated with increased infant distress of around 30 min/night at two weeks, reducing to 12 min/night by three months of age. However, differences in infant distress between General-Community subgroups adopting limit-setting versus infant-cued parenting were not large or statistically significant at any age. The figures provide descriptive evidence about limit-setting parenting which may counter some doubts about this form of parenting and help parents and professionals to make choices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5356193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53561932017-03-27 Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age St James-Roberts, Ian Roberts, Marion Hovish, Kimberly Owen, Charlie Prim Health Care Res Dev Research AIM: To provide descriptive figures for infant distress and associated parenting at night in normal London home environments during the first three months of age. BACKGROUND: Most western infants develop long night-time sleep periods by four months of age. However, 30% of infants in many countries sleep for short periods and cry out on waking in the night: the most common type of infant sleep behaviour problem. Preventive interventions may help families and improve services. There is evidence that ‘limit-setting’ parenting, which is common in western cultures, supports the development of settled infant night-time behaviour. However, a recent review has challenged this and argued that this form of parenting risks distressing infants. This study describes limit-setting parenting as practiced in London, compares it with ‘infant-cued’ parenting and measures the associated infant distress. METHODS: Longitudinal infrared video, diary and questionnaire observations comparing a General-Community (n=101) group and subgroups with a Bed-Sharing (n=19) group on measures of infant and parenting behaviours at night. FINDINGS: General-Community parents took longer to detect and respond to infant waking and signalling, and to begin feeding, compared with the highly infant-cued care provided by Bed-Sharing parents. The average latency in General-Community parents’ responding to infant night-time waking was 3.5 min, during which infants fuss/cried for around 1 min. Compared with Bed-Sharing parenting, General-Community parenting was associated with increased infant distress of around 30 min/night at two weeks, reducing to 12 min/night by three months of age. However, differences in infant distress between General-Community subgroups adopting limit-setting versus infant-cued parenting were not large or statistically significant at any age. The figures provide descriptive evidence about limit-setting parenting which may counter some doubts about this form of parenting and help parents and professionals to make choices. Cambridge University Press 2016-09-09 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5356193/ /pubmed/27609027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000293 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research St James-Roberts, Ian Roberts, Marion Hovish, Kimberly Owen, Charlie Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age |
title | Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age |
title_full | Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age |
title_fullStr | Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age |
title_full_unstemmed | Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age |
title_short | Descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age |
title_sort | descriptive figures for differences in parenting and infant night-time distress in the first three months of age |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5356193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stjamesrobertsian descriptivefiguresfordifferencesinparentingandinfantnighttimedistressinthefirstthreemonthsofage AT robertsmarion descriptivefiguresfordifferencesinparentingandinfantnighttimedistressinthefirstthreemonthsofage AT hovishkimberly descriptivefiguresfordifferencesinparentingandinfantnighttimedistressinthefirstthreemonthsofage AT owencharlie descriptivefiguresfordifferencesinparentingandinfantnighttimedistressinthefirstthreemonthsofage |