Cargando…

Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC), a debilitating disease, usually starts in early childhood after variable dose of injections around the buttock, if left untreated it worsens gradually and persists throughout the life. Because the disease mostly affects adolescents and adults, there is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rai, Saroj, Jin, Shengyang, Meng, Chunqing, Chaudhary, Nabin, Tamang, Nira, Wang, Xiaohong, Liu, Xianzhe, Wang, Hong, Yang, Shuhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5356281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28302115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1484-6
_version_ 1782515795511738368
author Rai, Saroj
Jin, Shengyang
Meng, Chunqing
Chaudhary, Nabin
Tamang, Nira
Wang, Xiaohong
Liu, Xianzhe
Wang, Hong
Yang, Shuhua
author_facet Rai, Saroj
Jin, Shengyang
Meng, Chunqing
Chaudhary, Nabin
Tamang, Nira
Wang, Xiaohong
Liu, Xianzhe
Wang, Hong
Yang, Shuhua
author_sort Rai, Saroj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC), a debilitating disease, usually starts in early childhood after variable dose of injections around the buttock, if left untreated it worsens gradually and persists throughout the life. Because the disease mostly affects adolescents and adults, there is always an aesthetic concerns. Purposeof the study was to introduce the arthroscopic F and C method of GMC release, and to compare its clinical efficiency with conventional open surgery in terms of clinical outcome, rate of complications, patient’s satisfactions, and recurrence. METHODS: Between Jan 2013 and July 2015, 75 patients received an arthroscopic release with F and C release method and 71 patients received conventional open release of GMC. Primary surgeries in 16 years or older patients were included in the study. Two groups were compared clinically using Hip Outcome Scores – Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Scores – Sports Subscale (HOS-Sports), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Ye et al. evaluation criteria. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in Hip Outcome Scores – Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL) (P = 0.078), Hip Outcome Scores – Sports Subscale (HOS-Sports) (P = 0.340), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (P = 0.524) between the two groups. 74 (98.7%) patients in the arthroscopic surgery group had good to excellent results, whereas 69 (97.1%) patients in the conventional open surgery group had good to excellent results (P = 0.727). No statistically significant difference was observed in recurrence rate (P = 0.612). Statistically significant differences were observed in incision length, use of post-operative analgesia, post-operative off-bed activity, and hospital stay. Complications were significantly higher in the conventional open surgery group (n = 21) than in the arthroscopic surgery group (n = 10) (P = 0.016). More importantly, cosmetic satisfaction was 100% in arthroscopic release group, whereas only 71% had cosmetic satisfaction in conventional open surgery group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both, arthroscopic surgery and conventional open surgery, are highly effective tools for the GMC release in adolescent and adult patients. Arthroscopic GMC release with F and C method allows precise and selective release of contracture bands with small surgical trauma resulting fewer complications, high cosmetic satisfaction and minimal recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5356281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53562812017-03-22 Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study Rai, Saroj Jin, Shengyang Meng, Chunqing Chaudhary, Nabin Tamang, Nira Wang, Xiaohong Liu, Xianzhe Wang, Hong Yang, Shuhua BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC), a debilitating disease, usually starts in early childhood after variable dose of injections around the buttock, if left untreated it worsens gradually and persists throughout the life. Because the disease mostly affects adolescents and adults, there is always an aesthetic concerns. Purposeof the study was to introduce the arthroscopic F and C method of GMC release, and to compare its clinical efficiency with conventional open surgery in terms of clinical outcome, rate of complications, patient’s satisfactions, and recurrence. METHODS: Between Jan 2013 and July 2015, 75 patients received an arthroscopic release with F and C release method and 71 patients received conventional open release of GMC. Primary surgeries in 16 years or older patients were included in the study. Two groups were compared clinically using Hip Outcome Scores – Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Scores – Sports Subscale (HOS-Sports), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Ye et al. evaluation criteria. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in Hip Outcome Scores – Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL) (P = 0.078), Hip Outcome Scores – Sports Subscale (HOS-Sports) (P = 0.340), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (P = 0.524) between the two groups. 74 (98.7%) patients in the arthroscopic surgery group had good to excellent results, whereas 69 (97.1%) patients in the conventional open surgery group had good to excellent results (P = 0.727). No statistically significant difference was observed in recurrence rate (P = 0.612). Statistically significant differences were observed in incision length, use of post-operative analgesia, post-operative off-bed activity, and hospital stay. Complications were significantly higher in the conventional open surgery group (n = 21) than in the arthroscopic surgery group (n = 10) (P = 0.016). More importantly, cosmetic satisfaction was 100% in arthroscopic release group, whereas only 71% had cosmetic satisfaction in conventional open surgery group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both, arthroscopic surgery and conventional open surgery, are highly effective tools for the GMC release in adolescent and adult patients. Arthroscopic GMC release with F and C method allows precise and selective release of contracture bands with small surgical trauma resulting fewer complications, high cosmetic satisfaction and minimal recurrence. BioMed Central 2017-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5356281/ /pubmed/28302115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1484-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rai, Saroj
Jin, Shengyang
Meng, Chunqing
Chaudhary, Nabin
Tamang, Nira
Wang, Xiaohong
Liu, Xianzhe
Wang, Hong
Yang, Shuhua
Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study
title Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study
title_full Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study
title_fullStr Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study
title_short Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study
title_sort arthroscopic release using f and c method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5356281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28302115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1484-6
work_keys_str_mv AT raisaroj arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy
AT jinshengyang arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy
AT mengchunqing arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy
AT chaudharynabin arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy
AT tamangnira arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy
AT wangxiaohong arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy
AT liuxianzhe arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy
AT wanghong arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy
AT yangshuhua arthroscopicreleaseusingfandcmethodversusconventionalopenreleasemethodinthetreatmentofglutealmusclecontractureacomparativestudy