Cargando…

External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study

Emerging models for predicting risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require external validation in order to assess their clinical value. We validated a previous model for predicting new onset COPD in a different database. We randomly drew 38,597 case-control pairs (total N = 77,194)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nwaru, Bright I, Simpson, Colin R, Sheikh, Aziz, Kotz, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5356333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28304375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44702
_version_ 1782515811335798784
author Nwaru, Bright I
Simpson, Colin R
Sheikh, Aziz
Kotz, Daniel
author_facet Nwaru, Bright I
Simpson, Colin R
Sheikh, Aziz
Kotz, Daniel
author_sort Nwaru, Bright I
collection PubMed
description Emerging models for predicting risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require external validation in order to assess their clinical value. We validated a previous model for predicting new onset COPD in a different database. We randomly drew 38,597 case-control pairs (total N = 77,194) of individuals aged ≥35 years and matched for sex, age, and general practice from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink database. We assessed accuracy of the model to discriminate between COPD cases and non-cases by calculating area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC(AUC)) for the prediction scores. Analogous to the development model, ever smoking (OR 6.70; 95%CI 6.41–6.99), prior asthma (OR 6.43; 95%CI 5.85–7.07), and higher socioeconomic deprivation (OR 2.90; 95%CI 2.72–3.09 for highest vs. lowest quintile) increased the risk of COPD. The validated prediction scores ranged from 0–5.71 (ROC(AUC) 0.66; 95%CI 0.65–0.66) for males and 0–5.95 (ROC(AUC) 0.71; 95%CI 0.70–0.71) for females. We have confirmed that smoking, prior asthma, and socioeconomic deprivation are key risk factors for new onset COPD. Our model seems externally valid at identifying patients at risk of developing COPD. An impact assessment now needs to be undertaken to assess whether this prediction model can be applied in clinical care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5356333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53563332017-03-22 External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study Nwaru, Bright I Simpson, Colin R Sheikh, Aziz Kotz, Daniel Sci Rep Article Emerging models for predicting risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require external validation in order to assess their clinical value. We validated a previous model for predicting new onset COPD in a different database. We randomly drew 38,597 case-control pairs (total N = 77,194) of individuals aged ≥35 years and matched for sex, age, and general practice from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink database. We assessed accuracy of the model to discriminate between COPD cases and non-cases by calculating area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC(AUC)) for the prediction scores. Analogous to the development model, ever smoking (OR 6.70; 95%CI 6.41–6.99), prior asthma (OR 6.43; 95%CI 5.85–7.07), and higher socioeconomic deprivation (OR 2.90; 95%CI 2.72–3.09 for highest vs. lowest quintile) increased the risk of COPD. The validated prediction scores ranged from 0–5.71 (ROC(AUC) 0.66; 95%CI 0.65–0.66) for males and 0–5.95 (ROC(AUC) 0.71; 95%CI 0.70–0.71) for females. We have confirmed that smoking, prior asthma, and socioeconomic deprivation are key risk factors for new onset COPD. Our model seems externally valid at identifying patients at risk of developing COPD. An impact assessment now needs to be undertaken to assess whether this prediction model can be applied in clinical care settings. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5356333/ /pubmed/28304375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44702 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Nwaru, Bright I
Simpson, Colin R
Sheikh, Aziz
Kotz, Daniel
External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study
title External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study
title_full External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study
title_fullStr External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study
title_full_unstemmed External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study
title_short External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study
title_sort external validation of a copd prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5356333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28304375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44702
work_keys_str_mv AT nwarubrighti externalvalidationofacopdpredictionmodelusingpopulationbasedprimarycaredataanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT simpsoncolinr externalvalidationofacopdpredictionmodelusingpopulationbasedprimarycaredataanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT sheikhaziz externalvalidationofacopdpredictionmodelusingpopulationbasedprimarycaredataanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT kotzdaniel externalvalidationofacopdpredictionmodelusingpopulationbasedprimarycaredataanestedcasecontrolstudy