Cargando…

How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing

OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of research evaluating the risk tolerance of Emergency Department (ED) patients. We hypothesized that a significant percentage of ED patients surveyed would be comfortable with ≥5% risk of adverse outcome if they avoided testing in several hypothetical scenarios. MATER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padalecki, Jeremy, Xu, K. Tom, Smith, Cynthia, Carrasco, Lynn, Hensley, Justin, Richman, Peter B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.009
_version_ 1782515986317967360
author Padalecki, Jeremy
Xu, K. Tom
Smith, Cynthia
Carrasco, Lynn
Hensley, Justin
Richman, Peter B.
author_facet Padalecki, Jeremy
Xu, K. Tom
Smith, Cynthia
Carrasco, Lynn
Hensley, Justin
Richman, Peter B.
author_sort Padalecki, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of research evaluating the risk tolerance of Emergency Department (ED) patients. We hypothesized that a significant percentage of ED patients surveyed would be comfortable with ≥5% risk of adverse outcome if they avoided testing in several hypothetical scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of stable inner-city ED patients. Patients completed a written survey and were asked four closed-answer questions regarding risk tolerance/willingness to refuse a test/procedure, including the following scenarios: #1: LP following CT head; #2 overnight serial troponins for rule out myocardial infarction; #3 CT for possible appendicitis, #4 parent deciding whether child should undergo head CT for low risk head injury. Risk preferences were stratified to ≥5% (high) and <5% (low). Multivariate logistic regressions performed for each scenario to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: There were 217 patients in the study group; mean age 42 ± 15 years, 48% female, 66% Hispanic, 87% income < $40,000 income group. A substantial percentage of patients rated high risk tolerance for each scenario, including 31% for #1 (avoid LP), 25% for #2 (avoid cardiac rule-out admission), 27% for #3 (avoid CT for appendicitis), and 19% for #4 (avoid head CT for child). DISCUSSION: For 3 of 4 scenarios, 25% or more of our patients would accept a high risk tolerance of adverse outcome to avoid further testing. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute further evidence to the growing body of literature supporting patient interest in shared decision making in the ED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5357107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53571072017-03-24 How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing Padalecki, Jeremy Xu, K. Tom Smith, Cynthia Carrasco, Lynn Hensley, Justin Richman, Peter B. Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of research evaluating the risk tolerance of Emergency Department (ED) patients. We hypothesized that a significant percentage of ED patients surveyed would be comfortable with ≥5% risk of adverse outcome if they avoided testing in several hypothetical scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of stable inner-city ED patients. Patients completed a written survey and were asked four closed-answer questions regarding risk tolerance/willingness to refuse a test/procedure, including the following scenarios: #1: LP following CT head; #2 overnight serial troponins for rule out myocardial infarction; #3 CT for possible appendicitis, #4 parent deciding whether child should undergo head CT for low risk head injury. Risk preferences were stratified to ≥5% (high) and <5% (low). Multivariate logistic regressions performed for each scenario to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: There were 217 patients in the study group; mean age 42 ± 15 years, 48% female, 66% Hispanic, 87% income < $40,000 income group. A substantial percentage of patients rated high risk tolerance for each scenario, including 31% for #1 (avoid LP), 25% for #2 (avoid cardiac rule-out admission), 27% for #3 (avoid CT for appendicitis), and 19% for #4 (avoid head CT for child). DISCUSSION: For 3 of 4 scenarios, 25% or more of our patients would accept a high risk tolerance of adverse outcome to avoid further testing. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute further evidence to the growing body of literature supporting patient interest in shared decision making in the ED. Elsevier 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5357107/ /pubmed/28345068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.009 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Owner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Padalecki, Jeremy
Xu, K. Tom
Smith, Cynthia
Carrasco, Lynn
Hensley, Justin
Richman, Peter B.
How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing
title How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing
title_full How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing
title_fullStr How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing
title_full_unstemmed How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing
title_short How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing
title_sort how much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.009
work_keys_str_mv AT padaleckijeremy howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting
AT xuktom howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting
AT smithcynthia howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting
AT carrascolynn howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting
AT hensleyjustin howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting
AT richmanpeterb howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting