Cargando…
How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing
OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of research evaluating the risk tolerance of Emergency Department (ED) patients. We hypothesized that a significant percentage of ED patients surveyed would be comfortable with ≥5% risk of adverse outcome if they avoided testing in several hypothetical scenarios. MATER...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.009 |
_version_ | 1782515986317967360 |
---|---|
author | Padalecki, Jeremy Xu, K. Tom Smith, Cynthia Carrasco, Lynn Hensley, Justin Richman, Peter B. |
author_facet | Padalecki, Jeremy Xu, K. Tom Smith, Cynthia Carrasco, Lynn Hensley, Justin Richman, Peter B. |
author_sort | Padalecki, Jeremy |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of research evaluating the risk tolerance of Emergency Department (ED) patients. We hypothesized that a significant percentage of ED patients surveyed would be comfortable with ≥5% risk of adverse outcome if they avoided testing in several hypothetical scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of stable inner-city ED patients. Patients completed a written survey and were asked four closed-answer questions regarding risk tolerance/willingness to refuse a test/procedure, including the following scenarios: #1: LP following CT head; #2 overnight serial troponins for rule out myocardial infarction; #3 CT for possible appendicitis, #4 parent deciding whether child should undergo head CT for low risk head injury. Risk preferences were stratified to ≥5% (high) and <5% (low). Multivariate logistic regressions performed for each scenario to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: There were 217 patients in the study group; mean age 42 ± 15 years, 48% female, 66% Hispanic, 87% income < $40,000 income group. A substantial percentage of patients rated high risk tolerance for each scenario, including 31% for #1 (avoid LP), 25% for #2 (avoid cardiac rule-out admission), 27% for #3 (avoid CT for appendicitis), and 19% for #4 (avoid head CT for child). DISCUSSION: For 3 of 4 scenarios, 25% or more of our patients would accept a high risk tolerance of adverse outcome to avoid further testing. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute further evidence to the growing body of literature supporting patient interest in shared decision making in the ED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5357107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53571072017-03-24 How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing Padalecki, Jeremy Xu, K. Tom Smith, Cynthia Carrasco, Lynn Hensley, Justin Richman, Peter B. Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of research evaluating the risk tolerance of Emergency Department (ED) patients. We hypothesized that a significant percentage of ED patients surveyed would be comfortable with ≥5% risk of adverse outcome if they avoided testing in several hypothetical scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of stable inner-city ED patients. Patients completed a written survey and were asked four closed-answer questions regarding risk tolerance/willingness to refuse a test/procedure, including the following scenarios: #1: LP following CT head; #2 overnight serial troponins for rule out myocardial infarction; #3 CT for possible appendicitis, #4 parent deciding whether child should undergo head CT for low risk head injury. Risk preferences were stratified to ≥5% (high) and <5% (low). Multivariate logistic regressions performed for each scenario to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: There were 217 patients in the study group; mean age 42 ± 15 years, 48% female, 66% Hispanic, 87% income < $40,000 income group. A substantial percentage of patients rated high risk tolerance for each scenario, including 31% for #1 (avoid LP), 25% for #2 (avoid cardiac rule-out admission), 27% for #3 (avoid CT for appendicitis), and 19% for #4 (avoid head CT for child). DISCUSSION: For 3 of 4 scenarios, 25% or more of our patients would accept a high risk tolerance of adverse outcome to avoid further testing. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute further evidence to the growing body of literature supporting patient interest in shared decision making in the ED. Elsevier 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5357107/ /pubmed/28345068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.009 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Owner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Padalecki, Jeremy Xu, K. Tom Smith, Cynthia Carrasco, Lynn Hensley, Justin Richman, Peter B. How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing |
title | How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing |
title_full | How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing |
title_fullStr | How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing |
title_full_unstemmed | How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing |
title_short | How much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing |
title_sort | how much risk are emergency department patients willing to accept to avoid diagnostic testing |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT padaleckijeremy howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting AT xuktom howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting AT smithcynthia howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting AT carrascolynn howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting AT hensleyjustin howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting AT richmanpeterb howmuchriskareemergencydepartmentpatientswillingtoaccepttoavoiddiagnostictesting |