Cargando…

Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction

The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data availabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, K. M., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., White, A., Asmussen, M., Machalaba, C., Kennedy, S., Lopez, K., Wolf, T. M., Daszak, P., Travis, D. A., Karesh, W. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28176029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7
_version_ 1782516004242325504
author Smith, K. M.
Zambrana-Torrelio, C.
White, A.
Asmussen, M.
Machalaba, C.
Kennedy, S.
Lopez, K.
Wolf, T. M.
Daszak, P.
Travis, D. A.
Karesh, W. B.
author_facet Smith, K. M.
Zambrana-Torrelio, C.
White, A.
Asmussen, M.
Machalaba, C.
Kennedy, S.
Lopez, K.
Wolf, T. M.
Daszak, P.
Travis, D. A.
Karesh, W. B.
author_sort Smith, K. M.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data available (USFWS LEMIS system), involving 11 billion individual specimens and an additional 977 million kilograms of wildlife. The majority of shipments contained mammals (27%), while the majority of specimens imported were shells (57%) and tropical fish (25%). Most imports were facilitated by the aquatic and pet industry, resulting in one-third of all shipments containing live animals. The importer reported origin of wildlife was 77.7% wild-caught and 17.7% captive-reared. Indonesia was the leading exporter of legal shipments, while Mexico was the leading source reported for illegal shipments. At the specimen level, China was the leading exporter of legal and illegal wildlife imports. The number of annual declared shipments doubled during the period examined, illustrating continually increasing demand, which reinforces the need to scale up capacity for border inspections, risk management protocols and disease surveillance. Most regulatory oversight of wildlife trade is aimed at conservation, rather than prevention of disease introduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5357285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53572852017-03-30 Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction Smith, K. M. Zambrana-Torrelio, C. White, A. Asmussen, M. Machalaba, C. Kennedy, S. Lopez, K. Wolf, T. M. Daszak, P. Travis, D. A. Karesh, W. B. Ecohealth Original Contribution The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data available (USFWS LEMIS system), involving 11 billion individual specimens and an additional 977 million kilograms of wildlife. The majority of shipments contained mammals (27%), while the majority of specimens imported were shells (57%) and tropical fish (25%). Most imports were facilitated by the aquatic and pet industry, resulting in one-third of all shipments containing live animals. The importer reported origin of wildlife was 77.7% wild-caught and 17.7% captive-reared. Indonesia was the leading exporter of legal shipments, while Mexico was the leading source reported for illegal shipments. At the specimen level, China was the leading exporter of legal and illegal wildlife imports. The number of annual declared shipments doubled during the period examined, illustrating continually increasing demand, which reinforces the need to scale up capacity for border inspections, risk management protocols and disease surveillance. Most regulatory oversight of wildlife trade is aimed at conservation, rather than prevention of disease introduction. Springer US 2017-02-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5357285/ /pubmed/28176029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Smith, K. M.
Zambrana-Torrelio, C.
White, A.
Asmussen, M.
Machalaba, C.
Kennedy, S.
Lopez, K.
Wolf, T. M.
Daszak, P.
Travis, D. A.
Karesh, W. B.
Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction
title Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction
title_full Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction
title_fullStr Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction
title_full_unstemmed Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction
title_short Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction
title_sort summarizing us wildlife trade with an eye toward assessing the risk of infectious disease introduction
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28176029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7
work_keys_str_mv AT smithkm summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT zambranatorrelioc summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT whitea summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT asmussenm summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT machalabac summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT kennedys summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT lopezk summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT wolftm summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT daszakp summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT travisda summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction
AT kareshwb summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction