Cargando…
Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction
The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data availabl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28176029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7 |
_version_ | 1782516004242325504 |
---|---|
author | Smith, K. M. Zambrana-Torrelio, C. White, A. Asmussen, M. Machalaba, C. Kennedy, S. Lopez, K. Wolf, T. M. Daszak, P. Travis, D. A. Karesh, W. B. |
author_facet | Smith, K. M. Zambrana-Torrelio, C. White, A. Asmussen, M. Machalaba, C. Kennedy, S. Lopez, K. Wolf, T. M. Daszak, P. Travis, D. A. Karesh, W. B. |
author_sort | Smith, K. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data available (USFWS LEMIS system), involving 11 billion individual specimens and an additional 977 million kilograms of wildlife. The majority of shipments contained mammals (27%), while the majority of specimens imported were shells (57%) and tropical fish (25%). Most imports were facilitated by the aquatic and pet industry, resulting in one-third of all shipments containing live animals. The importer reported origin of wildlife was 77.7% wild-caught and 17.7% captive-reared. Indonesia was the leading exporter of legal shipments, while Mexico was the leading source reported for illegal shipments. At the specimen level, China was the leading exporter of legal and illegal wildlife imports. The number of annual declared shipments doubled during the period examined, illustrating continually increasing demand, which reinforces the need to scale up capacity for border inspections, risk management protocols and disease surveillance. Most regulatory oversight of wildlife trade is aimed at conservation, rather than prevention of disease introduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5357285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53572852017-03-30 Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction Smith, K. M. Zambrana-Torrelio, C. White, A. Asmussen, M. Machalaba, C. Kennedy, S. Lopez, K. Wolf, T. M. Daszak, P. Travis, D. A. Karesh, W. B. Ecohealth Original Contribution The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data available (USFWS LEMIS system), involving 11 billion individual specimens and an additional 977 million kilograms of wildlife. The majority of shipments contained mammals (27%), while the majority of specimens imported were shells (57%) and tropical fish (25%). Most imports were facilitated by the aquatic and pet industry, resulting in one-third of all shipments containing live animals. The importer reported origin of wildlife was 77.7% wild-caught and 17.7% captive-reared. Indonesia was the leading exporter of legal shipments, while Mexico was the leading source reported for illegal shipments. At the specimen level, China was the leading exporter of legal and illegal wildlife imports. The number of annual declared shipments doubled during the period examined, illustrating continually increasing demand, which reinforces the need to scale up capacity for border inspections, risk management protocols and disease surveillance. Most regulatory oversight of wildlife trade is aimed at conservation, rather than prevention of disease introduction. Springer US 2017-02-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5357285/ /pubmed/28176029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution Smith, K. M. Zambrana-Torrelio, C. White, A. Asmussen, M. Machalaba, C. Kennedy, S. Lopez, K. Wolf, T. M. Daszak, P. Travis, D. A. Karesh, W. B. Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction |
title | Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction |
title_full | Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction |
title_fullStr | Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction |
title_short | Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction |
title_sort | summarizing us wildlife trade with an eye toward assessing the risk of infectious disease introduction |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28176029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithkm summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT zambranatorrelioc summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT whitea summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT asmussenm summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT machalabac summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT kennedys summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT lopezk summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT wolftm summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT daszakp summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT travisda summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction AT kareshwb summarizinguswildlifetradewithaneyetowardassessingtheriskofinfectiousdiseaseintroduction |