Cargando…
Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing
BACKGROUND: The importance of accurate and affordable mutation calling in fixed pathology samples is becoming increasingly important as we move into the era of personalised medicine. The Affymetrix OncoScan® Array platform is designed to produce actionable mutation calls in archival material. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28315634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5 |
_version_ | 1782516015507177472 |
---|---|
author | Wood, Henry M. Foster, Joseph M. Taylor, Morag Tinkler-Hundal, Emma Togneri, Fiona S. Wojtowicz, Paula Oumie, Assa Spink, Karen G. Brew, Fiona Quirke, Philip |
author_facet | Wood, Henry M. Foster, Joseph M. Taylor, Morag Tinkler-Hundal, Emma Togneri, Fiona S. Wojtowicz, Paula Oumie, Assa Spink, Karen G. Brew, Fiona Quirke, Philip |
author_sort | Wood, Henry M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The importance of accurate and affordable mutation calling in fixed pathology samples is becoming increasingly important as we move into the era of personalised medicine. The Affymetrix OncoScan® Array platform is designed to produce actionable mutation calls in archival material. METHODS: We compared calls made using the OncoScan platform with calls made using a custom designed PCR panel followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), in order to benchmark the sensitivity and specificity of the OncoScan calls in a large cohort of fixed tumour samples. 392 fixed, clinical samples were sequenced, encompassing 641 PCR regions, 403 putative positive calls and 1528 putative negative calls. RESULTS: A small number of mutations could not be validated, either due to large indels or pseudogenes impairing parts of the NGS pipeline. For the remainder, if calls were filtered according to simple quality metrics, both sensitivity and specificity for the OncoScan platform were over 98%. This applied even to samples with poorer sample quality and lower variant allele frequency (5–10%) than product claims indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This benchmarking study will be useful to users and potential users of this platform, who wish to compare technologies or interpret their own results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5357332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53573322017-03-22 Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing Wood, Henry M. Foster, Joseph M. Taylor, Morag Tinkler-Hundal, Emma Togneri, Fiona S. Wojtowicz, Paula Oumie, Assa Spink, Karen G. Brew, Fiona Quirke, Philip BMC Med Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The importance of accurate and affordable mutation calling in fixed pathology samples is becoming increasingly important as we move into the era of personalised medicine. The Affymetrix OncoScan® Array platform is designed to produce actionable mutation calls in archival material. METHODS: We compared calls made using the OncoScan platform with calls made using a custom designed PCR panel followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), in order to benchmark the sensitivity and specificity of the OncoScan calls in a large cohort of fixed tumour samples. 392 fixed, clinical samples were sequenced, encompassing 641 PCR regions, 403 putative positive calls and 1528 putative negative calls. RESULTS: A small number of mutations could not be validated, either due to large indels or pseudogenes impairing parts of the NGS pipeline. For the remainder, if calls were filtered according to simple quality metrics, both sensitivity and specificity for the OncoScan platform were over 98%. This applied even to samples with poorer sample quality and lower variant allele frequency (5–10%) than product claims indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This benchmarking study will be useful to users and potential users of this platform, who wish to compare technologies or interpret their own results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5357332/ /pubmed/28315634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wood, Henry M. Foster, Joseph M. Taylor, Morag Tinkler-Hundal, Emma Togneri, Fiona S. Wojtowicz, Paula Oumie, Assa Spink, Karen G. Brew, Fiona Quirke, Philip Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing |
title | Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing |
title_full | Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing |
title_fullStr | Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing |
title_short | Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing |
title_sort | comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix oncoscan® array and pcr based next-generation sequencing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28315634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodhenrym comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT fosterjosephm comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT taylormorag comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT tinklerhundalemma comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT tognerifionas comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT wojtowiczpaula comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT oumieassa comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT spinkkareng comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT brewfiona comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing AT quirkephilip comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing |