Cargando…

Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND: The importance of accurate and affordable mutation calling in fixed pathology samples is becoming increasingly important as we move into the era of personalised medicine. The Affymetrix OncoScan® Array platform is designed to produce actionable mutation calls in archival material. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Henry M., Foster, Joseph M., Taylor, Morag, Tinkler-Hundal, Emma, Togneri, Fiona S., Wojtowicz, Paula, Oumie, Assa, Spink, Karen G., Brew, Fiona, Quirke, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28315634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5
_version_ 1782516015507177472
author Wood, Henry M.
Foster, Joseph M.
Taylor, Morag
Tinkler-Hundal, Emma
Togneri, Fiona S.
Wojtowicz, Paula
Oumie, Assa
Spink, Karen G.
Brew, Fiona
Quirke, Philip
author_facet Wood, Henry M.
Foster, Joseph M.
Taylor, Morag
Tinkler-Hundal, Emma
Togneri, Fiona S.
Wojtowicz, Paula
Oumie, Assa
Spink, Karen G.
Brew, Fiona
Quirke, Philip
author_sort Wood, Henry M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The importance of accurate and affordable mutation calling in fixed pathology samples is becoming increasingly important as we move into the era of personalised medicine. The Affymetrix OncoScan® Array platform is designed to produce actionable mutation calls in archival material. METHODS: We compared calls made using the OncoScan platform with calls made using a custom designed PCR panel followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), in order to benchmark the sensitivity and specificity of the OncoScan calls in a large cohort of fixed tumour samples. 392 fixed, clinical samples were sequenced, encompassing 641 PCR regions, 403 putative positive calls and 1528 putative negative calls. RESULTS: A small number of mutations could not be validated, either due to large indels or pseudogenes impairing parts of the NGS pipeline. For the remainder, if calls were filtered according to simple quality metrics, both sensitivity and specificity for the OncoScan platform were over 98%. This applied even to samples with poorer sample quality and lower variant allele frequency (5–10%) than product claims indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This benchmarking study will be useful to users and potential users of this platform, who wish to compare technologies or interpret their own results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5357332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53573322017-03-22 Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing Wood, Henry M. Foster, Joseph M. Taylor, Morag Tinkler-Hundal, Emma Togneri, Fiona S. Wojtowicz, Paula Oumie, Assa Spink, Karen G. Brew, Fiona Quirke, Philip BMC Med Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The importance of accurate and affordable mutation calling in fixed pathology samples is becoming increasingly important as we move into the era of personalised medicine. The Affymetrix OncoScan® Array platform is designed to produce actionable mutation calls in archival material. METHODS: We compared calls made using the OncoScan platform with calls made using a custom designed PCR panel followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), in order to benchmark the sensitivity and specificity of the OncoScan calls in a large cohort of fixed tumour samples. 392 fixed, clinical samples were sequenced, encompassing 641 PCR regions, 403 putative positive calls and 1528 putative negative calls. RESULTS: A small number of mutations could not be validated, either due to large indels or pseudogenes impairing parts of the NGS pipeline. For the remainder, if calls were filtered according to simple quality metrics, both sensitivity and specificity for the OncoScan platform were over 98%. This applied even to samples with poorer sample quality and lower variant allele frequency (5–10%) than product claims indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This benchmarking study will be useful to users and potential users of this platform, who wish to compare technologies or interpret their own results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5357332/ /pubmed/28315634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wood, Henry M.
Foster, Joseph M.
Taylor, Morag
Tinkler-Hundal, Emma
Togneri, Fiona S.
Wojtowicz, Paula
Oumie, Assa
Spink, Karen G.
Brew, Fiona
Quirke, Philip
Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing
title Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing
title_full Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing
title_fullStr Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing
title_short Comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix OncoScan® array and PCR based next-generation sequencing
title_sort comparing mutation calls in fixed tumour samples between the affymetrix oncoscan® array and pcr based next-generation sequencing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28315634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0254-5
work_keys_str_mv AT woodhenrym comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT fosterjosephm comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT taylormorag comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT tinklerhundalemma comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT tognerifionas comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT wojtowiczpaula comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT oumieassa comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT spinkkareng comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT brewfiona comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing
AT quirkephilip comparingmutationcallsinfixedtumoursamplesbetweentheaffymetrixoncoscanarrayandpcrbasednextgenerationsequencing