Cargando…
Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review
PURPOSE: Patients with advanced disease are living longer and commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may miss relevant elements of the quality of extended survival. This systematic review examines the measures used to capture aspects of the quality of survival including impact on pa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0580-1 |
_version_ | 1782516047474065408 |
---|---|
author | Catt, Susan Starkings, Rachel Shilling, Valerie Fallowfield, Lesley |
author_facet | Catt, Susan Starkings, Rachel Shilling, Valerie Fallowfield, Lesley |
author_sort | Catt, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Patients with advanced disease are living longer and commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may miss relevant elements of the quality of extended survival. This systematic review examines the measures used to capture aspects of the quality of survival including impact on patients’ everyday lives such as finances, work and family roles. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO restricted to English language articles. Information on study characteristics, instruments and outcomes was systematically extracted and synthesised. A predefined set of criteria was used to rate the quality of studies. RESULTS: From 2761 potentially relevant articles, 22 met all inclusion criteria, including 10 concerning financial distress, 3 on roles and responsibilities and 9 on multiple aspects of social well-being. Generally, studies were not of high quality; many lacked bias free participant selection, had confounding factors and had not accounted for all participants. High levels of financial distress were reported and were associated with multiple demographic factors such as age and income. There were few reports concerned with impacts on patients’ roles/responsibilities in everyday life although practical and emotional struggles with parenting were identified. Social difficulties were common and associated with multiple factors including being a caregiver. Many studies were single time-point surveys and used non-validated measures. Exceptions were employment of the COST and Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI), validated measures of financial and social distress respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Impact on some important parts of patients’ everyday lives is insufficiently and inconsistently captured. Further PROM development focussing on roles and responsibilities, including work and caring for dependents, is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Factors such as finances, employment and responsibility for caring for dependants (e.g. children and elderly relatives) can affect the well-being of cancer survivors. There is a need to ensure that any instruments used to assess patients’ social well-being are broad enough to include these areas so that any difficulties arising can be better understood and appropriately supported. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5357497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53574972017-03-30 Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review Catt, Susan Starkings, Rachel Shilling, Valerie Fallowfield, Lesley J Cancer Surviv Review PURPOSE: Patients with advanced disease are living longer and commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may miss relevant elements of the quality of extended survival. This systematic review examines the measures used to capture aspects of the quality of survival including impact on patients’ everyday lives such as finances, work and family roles. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO restricted to English language articles. Information on study characteristics, instruments and outcomes was systematically extracted and synthesised. A predefined set of criteria was used to rate the quality of studies. RESULTS: From 2761 potentially relevant articles, 22 met all inclusion criteria, including 10 concerning financial distress, 3 on roles and responsibilities and 9 on multiple aspects of social well-being. Generally, studies were not of high quality; many lacked bias free participant selection, had confounding factors and had not accounted for all participants. High levels of financial distress were reported and were associated with multiple demographic factors such as age and income. There were few reports concerned with impacts on patients’ roles/responsibilities in everyday life although practical and emotional struggles with parenting were identified. Social difficulties were common and associated with multiple factors including being a caregiver. Many studies were single time-point surveys and used non-validated measures. Exceptions were employment of the COST and Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI), validated measures of financial and social distress respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Impact on some important parts of patients’ everyday lives is insufficiently and inconsistently captured. Further PROM development focussing on roles and responsibilities, including work and caring for dependents, is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Factors such as finances, employment and responsibility for caring for dependants (e.g. children and elderly relatives) can affect the well-being of cancer survivors. There is a need to ensure that any instruments used to assess patients’ social well-being are broad enough to include these areas so that any difficulties arising can be better understood and appropriately supported. Springer US 2016-11-10 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5357497/ /pubmed/27834041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0580-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Catt, Susan Starkings, Rachel Shilling, Valerie Fallowfield, Lesley Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review |
title | Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review |
title_full | Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review |
title_short | Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review |
title_sort | patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0580-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cattsusan patientreportedoutcomemeasuresoftheimpactofcanceronpatientseverydaylivesasystematicreview AT starkingsrachel patientreportedoutcomemeasuresoftheimpactofcanceronpatientseverydaylivesasystematicreview AT shillingvalerie patientreportedoutcomemeasuresoftheimpactofcanceronpatientseverydaylivesasystematicreview AT fallowfieldlesley patientreportedoutcomemeasuresoftheimpactofcanceronpatientseverydaylivesasystematicreview |