Cargando…

Getting started with tables

BACKGROUND: Tables are often overlooked by many readers of papers who tend to focus on the text. Good tables tell much of the story of a paper and give a richer insight into the details of the study participants and the main research findings. Being confident in reading tables and constructing clear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inskip, Hazel, Ntani, Georgia, Westbury, Leo, Di Gravio, Chiara, D’Angelo, Stefania, Parsons, Camille, Baird, Janis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0180-1
_version_ 1782516110409596928
author Inskip, Hazel
Ntani, Georgia
Westbury, Leo
Di Gravio, Chiara
D’Angelo, Stefania
Parsons, Camille
Baird, Janis
author_facet Inskip, Hazel
Ntani, Georgia
Westbury, Leo
Di Gravio, Chiara
D’Angelo, Stefania
Parsons, Camille
Baird, Janis
author_sort Inskip, Hazel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tables are often overlooked by many readers of papers who tend to focus on the text. Good tables tell much of the story of a paper and give a richer insight into the details of the study participants and the main research findings. Being confident in reading tables and constructing clear tables are important skills for researchers to master. METHOD: Common forms of tables were considered, along with the standard statistics used in them. Papers in the Archives of Public Health published during 2015 and 2016 were hand-searched for examples to illustrate the points being made. Presentation of graphs and figures were not considered as they are outside the scope of the paper. RESULTS: Basic statistical concepts are outlined to aid understanding of each of the tables presented. The first table in many papers gives an overview of the study population and its characteristics, usually giving numbers and percentages of the study population in different categories (e.g. by sex, educational attainment, smoking status) and summaries of measured characteristics (continuous variables) of the participants (e.g. age, height, body mass index). Tables giving the results of the analyses follow; these often include summaries of characteristics in different groups of participants, as well as relationships between the outcome under study and the exposure of interest. For continuous outcome data, results are often expressed as differences between means, or regression or correlation coefficients. Ratio/relative measures (e.g. relative risks, odds ratios) are usually used for binary outcome measures that take one of two values for each study participants (e.g. dead versus alive, obese versus non-obese). Tables come in many forms, but various standard types are described here. CONCLUSION: Clear tables provide much of the important detail in a paper and researchers are encouraged to read and construct them with care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5357815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53578152017-03-20 Getting started with tables Inskip, Hazel Ntani, Georgia Westbury, Leo Di Gravio, Chiara D’Angelo, Stefania Parsons, Camille Baird, Janis Arch Public Health Methodology BACKGROUND: Tables are often overlooked by many readers of papers who tend to focus on the text. Good tables tell much of the story of a paper and give a richer insight into the details of the study participants and the main research findings. Being confident in reading tables and constructing clear tables are important skills for researchers to master. METHOD: Common forms of tables were considered, along with the standard statistics used in them. Papers in the Archives of Public Health published during 2015 and 2016 were hand-searched for examples to illustrate the points being made. Presentation of graphs and figures were not considered as they are outside the scope of the paper. RESULTS: Basic statistical concepts are outlined to aid understanding of each of the tables presented. The first table in many papers gives an overview of the study population and its characteristics, usually giving numbers and percentages of the study population in different categories (e.g. by sex, educational attainment, smoking status) and summaries of measured characteristics (continuous variables) of the participants (e.g. age, height, body mass index). Tables giving the results of the analyses follow; these often include summaries of characteristics in different groups of participants, as well as relationships between the outcome under study and the exposure of interest. For continuous outcome data, results are often expressed as differences between means, or regression or correlation coefficients. Ratio/relative measures (e.g. relative risks, odds ratios) are usually used for binary outcome measures that take one of two values for each study participants (e.g. dead versus alive, obese versus non-obese). Tables come in many forms, but various standard types are described here. CONCLUSION: Clear tables provide much of the important detail in a paper and researchers are encouraged to read and construct them with care. BioMed Central 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5357815/ /pubmed/28321295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0180-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Inskip, Hazel
Ntani, Georgia
Westbury, Leo
Di Gravio, Chiara
D’Angelo, Stefania
Parsons, Camille
Baird, Janis
Getting started with tables
title Getting started with tables
title_full Getting started with tables
title_fullStr Getting started with tables
title_full_unstemmed Getting started with tables
title_short Getting started with tables
title_sort getting started with tables
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0180-1
work_keys_str_mv AT inskiphazel gettingstartedwithtables
AT ntanigeorgia gettingstartedwithtables
AT westburyleo gettingstartedwithtables
AT digraviochiara gettingstartedwithtables
AT dangelostefania gettingstartedwithtables
AT parsonscamille gettingstartedwithtables
AT bairdjanis gettingstartedwithtables