Cargando…

On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies

The determination of the second-order susceptibility (χ((2))) of thin film samples can be a delicate matter since well-established χ((2)) measurement methodologies such as the Maker fringe technique are best suited for nonlinear materials with large thicknesses typically ranging from tens of microns...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermans, Artur, Kieninger, Clemens, Koskinen, Kalle, Wickberg, Andreas, Solano, Eduardo, Dendooven, Jolien, Kauranen, Martti, Clemmen, Stéphane, Wegener, Martin, Koos, Christian, Baets, Roel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44581
_version_ 1782516128319275008
author Hermans, Artur
Kieninger, Clemens
Koskinen, Kalle
Wickberg, Andreas
Solano, Eduardo
Dendooven, Jolien
Kauranen, Martti
Clemmen, Stéphane
Wegener, Martin
Koos, Christian
Baets, Roel
author_facet Hermans, Artur
Kieninger, Clemens
Koskinen, Kalle
Wickberg, Andreas
Solano, Eduardo
Dendooven, Jolien
Kauranen, Martti
Clemmen, Stéphane
Wegener, Martin
Koos, Christian
Baets, Roel
author_sort Hermans, Artur
collection PubMed
description The determination of the second-order susceptibility (χ((2))) of thin film samples can be a delicate matter since well-established χ((2)) measurement methodologies such as the Maker fringe technique are best suited for nonlinear materials with large thicknesses typically ranging from tens of microns to several millimeters. Here we compare two different second-harmonic generation setups and the corresponding measurement methodologies that are especially advantageous for thin film χ((2)) characterization. This exercise allows for cross-checking the χ((2)) obtained for identical samples and identifying the main sources of error for the respective techniques. The development of photonic integrated circuits makes nonlinear thin films of particular interest, since they can be processed into long waveguides to create efficient nonlinear devices. The investigated samples are ABC-type nanolaminates, which were reported recently by two different research groups. However, the subsequent analysis can be useful for all researchers active in the field of thin film χ((2)) characterization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5357890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53578902017-03-22 On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies Hermans, Artur Kieninger, Clemens Koskinen, Kalle Wickberg, Andreas Solano, Eduardo Dendooven, Jolien Kauranen, Martti Clemmen, Stéphane Wegener, Martin Koos, Christian Baets, Roel Sci Rep Article The determination of the second-order susceptibility (χ((2))) of thin film samples can be a delicate matter since well-established χ((2)) measurement methodologies such as the Maker fringe technique are best suited for nonlinear materials with large thicknesses typically ranging from tens of microns to several millimeters. Here we compare two different second-harmonic generation setups and the corresponding measurement methodologies that are especially advantageous for thin film χ((2)) characterization. This exercise allows for cross-checking the χ((2)) obtained for identical samples and identifying the main sources of error for the respective techniques. The development of photonic integrated circuits makes nonlinear thin films of particular interest, since they can be processed into long waveguides to create efficient nonlinear devices. The investigated samples are ABC-type nanolaminates, which were reported recently by two different research groups. However, the subsequent analysis can be useful for all researchers active in the field of thin film χ((2)) characterization. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5357890/ /pubmed/28317938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44581 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Hermans, Artur
Kieninger, Clemens
Koskinen, Kalle
Wickberg, Andreas
Solano, Eduardo
Dendooven, Jolien
Kauranen, Martti
Clemmen, Stéphane
Wegener, Martin
Koos, Christian
Baets, Roel
On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies
title On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies
title_full On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies
title_fullStr On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies
title_full_unstemmed On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies
title_short On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies
title_sort on the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44581
work_keys_str_mv AT hermansartur onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT kieningerclemens onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT koskinenkalle onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT wickbergandreas onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT solanoeduardo onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT dendoovenjolien onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT kauranenmartti onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT clemmenstephane onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT wegenermartin onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT kooschristian onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies
AT baetsroel onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies