Cargando…
On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies
The determination of the second-order susceptibility (χ((2))) of thin film samples can be a delicate matter since well-established χ((2)) measurement methodologies such as the Maker fringe technique are best suited for nonlinear materials with large thicknesses typically ranging from tens of microns...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44581 |
_version_ | 1782516128319275008 |
---|---|
author | Hermans, Artur Kieninger, Clemens Koskinen, Kalle Wickberg, Andreas Solano, Eduardo Dendooven, Jolien Kauranen, Martti Clemmen, Stéphane Wegener, Martin Koos, Christian Baets, Roel |
author_facet | Hermans, Artur Kieninger, Clemens Koskinen, Kalle Wickberg, Andreas Solano, Eduardo Dendooven, Jolien Kauranen, Martti Clemmen, Stéphane Wegener, Martin Koos, Christian Baets, Roel |
author_sort | Hermans, Artur |
collection | PubMed |
description | The determination of the second-order susceptibility (χ((2))) of thin film samples can be a delicate matter since well-established χ((2)) measurement methodologies such as the Maker fringe technique are best suited for nonlinear materials with large thicknesses typically ranging from tens of microns to several millimeters. Here we compare two different second-harmonic generation setups and the corresponding measurement methodologies that are especially advantageous for thin film χ((2)) characterization. This exercise allows for cross-checking the χ((2)) obtained for identical samples and identifying the main sources of error for the respective techniques. The development of photonic integrated circuits makes nonlinear thin films of particular interest, since they can be processed into long waveguides to create efficient nonlinear devices. The investigated samples are ABC-type nanolaminates, which were reported recently by two different research groups. However, the subsequent analysis can be useful for all researchers active in the field of thin film χ((2)) characterization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5357890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53578902017-03-22 On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies Hermans, Artur Kieninger, Clemens Koskinen, Kalle Wickberg, Andreas Solano, Eduardo Dendooven, Jolien Kauranen, Martti Clemmen, Stéphane Wegener, Martin Koos, Christian Baets, Roel Sci Rep Article The determination of the second-order susceptibility (χ((2))) of thin film samples can be a delicate matter since well-established χ((2)) measurement methodologies such as the Maker fringe technique are best suited for nonlinear materials with large thicknesses typically ranging from tens of microns to several millimeters. Here we compare two different second-harmonic generation setups and the corresponding measurement methodologies that are especially advantageous for thin film χ((2)) characterization. This exercise allows for cross-checking the χ((2)) obtained for identical samples and identifying the main sources of error for the respective techniques. The development of photonic integrated circuits makes nonlinear thin films of particular interest, since they can be processed into long waveguides to create efficient nonlinear devices. The investigated samples are ABC-type nanolaminates, which were reported recently by two different research groups. However, the subsequent analysis can be useful for all researchers active in the field of thin film χ((2)) characterization. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5357890/ /pubmed/28317938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44581 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Hermans, Artur Kieninger, Clemens Koskinen, Kalle Wickberg, Andreas Solano, Eduardo Dendooven, Jolien Kauranen, Martti Clemmen, Stéphane Wegener, Martin Koos, Christian Baets, Roel On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies |
title | On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies |
title_full | On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies |
title_fullStr | On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies |
title_full_unstemmed | On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies |
title_short | On the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies |
title_sort | on the determination of χ((2)) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hermansartur onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT kieningerclemens onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT koskinenkalle onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT wickbergandreas onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT solanoeduardo onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT dendoovenjolien onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT kauranenmartti onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT clemmenstephane onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT wegenermartin onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT kooschristian onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies AT baetsroel onthedeterminationofch2inthinfilmsacomparisonofonebeamsecondharmonicgenerationmeasurementmethodologies |