Cargando…
Closure of Interatrial Septal Communications: Adverse Events and Lessons Learned
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous closure of interatrial septal communications (IASC) is generally being regarded as a safe and straightforward intervention. Reporting and classification of adverse events (AE) as is the case for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not standardized. Also, the focus of...
Autor principal: | Wagdi, Philipp |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5358124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348655 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/cr17w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Incidence and predictors of atrial fibrillation following transcatheter closure of interatrial septal communications using contemporary devices
por: Wagdi, Philipp
Publicado: (2010) -
Can Computer Tomography Predict Compromise of Cardiac Structures After Percutaneous Closure of Interatrial Septal Defects?
por: Wagdi, Philipp
Publicado: (2011) -
Is an interatrial communication the same as an atrial septal defect?
por: Anderson, Robert H.
Publicado: (2011) -
Midterm Follow-up Results of Transcatheter Interatrial Septal Defect Closure
por: Ghaderian, Mehdi, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Defining the morphologic phenotypes of atrial septal defects and interatrial communications
por: McCarthy, KP, et al.
Publicado: (2003)