Cargando…

The Duration of Impella 2.5 Circulatory Support and Length of Hospital Stay of Patients Undergoing High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of duration of Impella 2.5 support (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) on hospitalization of patients after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There has been a continuous increase in prevalence of coronary artery disease with more patients needing PCI during ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Anusionwu, Obiora, Fischman, Daniel, Cheriyath, Pramil
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Elmer Press 2012
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5358206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348680 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/cr190e

Ejemplares similares

Percutaneous Impella Mechanical Circulatory Support Delivery Using Intravascular Lithotripsy
por: Riley, Robert F., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of Thrombocytopenia in Patients Receiving Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support With an Impella Device
por: Houry, Erin A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Circulatory support with Impella CP device during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: initial experience in Poland
por: Dudek, Dariusz, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Left brachial artery: one more way to percutaneous insertion of IMPELLA 2.5L circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention – a case report
por: Sganzerla, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Percutaneous coronary intervention using a mechanical circulatory support system with an Impella centrifugal pump device combined with subsequent cryoablation for atrial fibrillation
por: Winnicka-Zielińska, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Mechanical circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock: Rationale and design of the multicenter, investigator-initiated IMPELLA-PL registry
por: Pietrasik, Arkadiusz, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Access site complications following Impella-supported high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions
por: Johannsen, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Is Lower in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported with Impella Compared to ECMO
por: Schweitzer, Julian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index and Hemolysis during Impella-Incorporated Mechanical Circulatory Support
por: Nakamura, Makiko, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Hemodynamic Support Using Percutaneous Transfemoral Impella 5.0 and Impella RP for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock
por: Dalal, Pratik K., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia under Mechanical Circulatory Support by Large Impella for Acute Cardiogenic Shock
por: Sugimura, Yukiharu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients on Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support with Impella-CP for Cardiogenic Shock
por: Fahad, Fadi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Percutaneous Salvage of an Impella Pretzel
por: Mathur, Moses, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Prediction of Length of Stay Following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Negassa, Abdissa, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

1459. Association of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Duration and Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Procedure
por: Alnaimi, Shaikha, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Determinants of Length of Stay Following Total Anterior Circulatory Stroke
por: Curtain, James P., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Successful use of the Impella Recover LP 5.0 device for circulatory support during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
por: Pepino, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

High Risk Coronary Atherectomy, Perforation, and Successful Percutaneous Treatment: When Impella Support Prevents Catastrophe
por: Peigh, Graham, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Mechanical circulatory support for percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
por: Farag, Mohamed, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The contemporary role of Impella in a comprehensive mechanical circulatory support program: a single institutional experience
por: Pieri, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Combined Venoarterial ECMO and Impella-CP Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Papillary Muscle Rupture
por: Ekanem, Emmanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
por: Shi, Wenhai, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Acute confusional state caused by Hashimoto's encephalopathy in a patient with hypothyroidism: a case report
por: Cheriyath, Pramil, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella CP hemodynamic support. A case series and method presentation
por: Sukiennik, Adam, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Fill Two Needs With One Deed! Single-Access Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella Hemodynamic Support
por: Ahmed, Taha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
por: Le Guyader, Alexandre, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Case series of transcatherter edge-to-edge repair using MitraClip(™) system with Impella(®) mechanical circulatory support
por: Tanaka, Shuhei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure as a predictor of periprocedural hemodynamic deterioration in patients undergoing Impella supported high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions
por: Al-Rashid, Fadi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Preventive Impella(®) Support in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
por: Benke, Kálmán, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Full percutaneous biventricular support with two Impella pumps: the Bi‐Pella approach
por: Pappalardo, Federico, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Nonemergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on an Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Supported with Impella® Heart Pump in Patients Ineligible for Surgical Revascularization
por: Meraj, Perwaiz M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outcome of Patients Supported by Large Impella Systems After Re-implantation Due to Continued or Recurrent Need of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
por: Sugimura, Yukiharu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high‐risk percutaneous coronary revascularization
por: Tarantini, Giuseppe, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Single vascular access for concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention and left ventricular assistance with Impella
por: Lyra, Flávio, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A prediction model for COPD readmissions: catching up, catching our breath, and improving a national problem
por: Amalakuhan, Bravein, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Axillary Artery Pseudoaneurysm Following Percutaneous Transaxillary Access for Impella Device Placement During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Alharbi, Anas A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of mechanical circulatory support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella for patients with cardiogenic shock: a propensity-matched analysis
por: Karatolios, Konstantinos, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impella 5.0/5.5 Implantation via Innominate Artery: Further Expanding the Opportunities for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
por: Bertolin, Stephanie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impella-rota-shock percutaneous coronary intervention: Three weapons, one last remaining vessel
por: Briosa, Alexandra, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Hemodynamic support with the Impella acute 100 in patients with cardiogenic chock, or high-risk coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
por: Dens, J, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_tiej03nbufcdh749h3tta68kid