Cargando…
Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated
Observing moving body parts can automatically activate topographically corresponding motor representations in the primary motor cortex (M1), the so-called direct matching. Novel neurophysiological findings from social contexts are nonetheless proving that this process is not automatic as previously...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5358745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28319191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173114 |
_version_ | 1782516273282809856 |
---|---|
author | Betti, Sonia Castiello, Umberto Guerra, Silvia Sartori, Luisa |
author_facet | Betti, Sonia Castiello, Umberto Guerra, Silvia Sartori, Luisa |
author_sort | Betti, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Observing moving body parts can automatically activate topographically corresponding motor representations in the primary motor cortex (M1), the so-called direct matching. Novel neurophysiological findings from social contexts are nonetheless proving that this process is not automatic as previously thought. The motor system can flexibly shift from imitative to incongruent motor preparation, when requested by a social gesture. In the present study we aim to bring an increase in the literature by assessing whether and how diverting overt spatial attention might affect motor preparation in contexts requiring interactive responses from the onlooker. Experiment 1 shows that overt attention—although anchored to an observed biological movement—can be captured by a target object as soon as a social request for it becomes evident. Experiment 2 reveals that the appearance of a short-lasting red dot in the contralateral space can divert attention from the target, but not from the biological movement. Nevertheless, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1 combined with electromyography (EMG) recordings (Experiment 3) indicates that attentional interference reduces corticospinal excitability related to the observed movement, but not motor preparation for a complementary action on the target. This work provides evidence that social motor preparation is impermeable to attentional interference and that a double dissociation is present between overt orienting of spatial attention and neurophysiological markers of action observation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5358745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53587452017-04-06 Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated Betti, Sonia Castiello, Umberto Guerra, Silvia Sartori, Luisa PLoS One Research Article Observing moving body parts can automatically activate topographically corresponding motor representations in the primary motor cortex (M1), the so-called direct matching. Novel neurophysiological findings from social contexts are nonetheless proving that this process is not automatic as previously thought. The motor system can flexibly shift from imitative to incongruent motor preparation, when requested by a social gesture. In the present study we aim to bring an increase in the literature by assessing whether and how diverting overt spatial attention might affect motor preparation in contexts requiring interactive responses from the onlooker. Experiment 1 shows that overt attention—although anchored to an observed biological movement—can be captured by a target object as soon as a social request for it becomes evident. Experiment 2 reveals that the appearance of a short-lasting red dot in the contralateral space can divert attention from the target, but not from the biological movement. Nevertheless, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1 combined with electromyography (EMG) recordings (Experiment 3) indicates that attentional interference reduces corticospinal excitability related to the observed movement, but not motor preparation for a complementary action on the target. This work provides evidence that social motor preparation is impermeable to attentional interference and that a double dissociation is present between overt orienting of spatial attention and neurophysiological markers of action observation. Public Library of Science 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5358745/ /pubmed/28319191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173114 Text en © 2017 Betti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Betti, Sonia Castiello, Umberto Guerra, Silvia Sartori, Luisa Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated |
title | Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated |
title_full | Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated |
title_fullStr | Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated |
title_full_unstemmed | Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated |
title_short | Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated |
title_sort | overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5358745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28319191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bettisonia overtorientingofspatialattentionandcorticospinalexcitabilityduringactionobservationareunrelated AT castielloumberto overtorientingofspatialattentionandcorticospinalexcitabilityduringactionobservationareunrelated AT guerrasilvia overtorientingofspatialattentionandcorticospinalexcitabilityduringactionobservationareunrelated AT sartoriluisa overtorientingofspatialattentionandcorticospinalexcitabilityduringactionobservationareunrelated |