Cargando…

Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality

BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) has an established role in the treatment of patients presenting with critical cardiac illnesses, including cardiogenic shock, refractory ischemia and for prophylaxis and treatment of complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jafary, Fahim H, Khan, Sohail A, Kumar, Haresh, Malik, Numaan F, Kazmi, Khawar A, Dhakam, Sajid, Shafquat, Azam, Hameed, Aamir, Tai, Javed, Nadeem, Najaf
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC535904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15574201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-4-22
_version_ 1782122034533236736
author Jafary, Fahim H
Khan, Sohail A
Kumar, Haresh
Malik, Numaan F
Kazmi, Khawar A
Dhakam, Sajid
Shafquat, Azam
Hameed, Aamir
Tai, Javed
Nadeem, Najaf
author_facet Jafary, Fahim H
Khan, Sohail A
Kumar, Haresh
Malik, Numaan F
Kazmi, Khawar A
Dhakam, Sajid
Shafquat, Azam
Hameed, Aamir
Tai, Javed
Nadeem, Najaf
author_sort Jafary, Fahim H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) has an established role in the treatment of patients presenting with critical cardiac illnesses, including cardiogenic shock, refractory ischemia and for prophylaxis and treatment of complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Patients requiring IABC represent a high-risk subset with an expected high mortality. There are virtually no data on usage patterns as well as outcomes of patients in the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent who require IABC. This is the first report on a sizeable experience with IABC from Pakistan. METHODS: Hospital charts of 95 patients (mean age 58.8 (± 10.4) years; 78.9% male) undergoing IABC between 2000–2002 were reviewed. Logistic regression was used to determine univariate and multivariate predictors of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The most frequent indications for IABC were cardiogenic shock (48.4%) and refractory ischemia (24.2%). Revascularization (surgical or PCI) was performed in 74 patients (77.9%). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 34.7%. Univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality included (odds ratio [95% CI]) age (OR 1.06 [1.01–1.11] for every year increase in age); diabetes (OR 3.68 [1.51–8.92]) and cardiogenic shock at presentation (OR 4.85 [1.92–12.2]). Furthermore, prior CABG (OR 0.12 [0.04–0.34]), and in-hospital revascularization (OR 0.05 [0.01–0.189]) was protective against mortality. In the multivariate analysis, independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were age (OR 1.13 [1.05–1.22] for every year increase in age); diabetes (OR 6.35 [1.61–24.97]) and cardiogenic shock at presentation (OR 10.0 [2.33–42.95]). Again, revascularization during hospitalization (OR 0.02 [0.003–0.12]) conferred a protective effect. The overall complication rate was low (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring IABC represent a high-risk group with substantial in-hospital mortality. Despite this high mortality, over two-thirds of patients do leave the hospital alive, suggesting that IABC is a feasible therapeutic device, even in a developing country.
format Text
id pubmed-535904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5359042004-12-17 Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality Jafary, Fahim H Khan, Sohail A Kumar, Haresh Malik, Numaan F Kazmi, Khawar A Dhakam, Sajid Shafquat, Azam Hameed, Aamir Tai, Javed Nadeem, Najaf BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) has an established role in the treatment of patients presenting with critical cardiac illnesses, including cardiogenic shock, refractory ischemia and for prophylaxis and treatment of complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Patients requiring IABC represent a high-risk subset with an expected high mortality. There are virtually no data on usage patterns as well as outcomes of patients in the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent who require IABC. This is the first report on a sizeable experience with IABC from Pakistan. METHODS: Hospital charts of 95 patients (mean age 58.8 (± 10.4) years; 78.9% male) undergoing IABC between 2000–2002 were reviewed. Logistic regression was used to determine univariate and multivariate predictors of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The most frequent indications for IABC were cardiogenic shock (48.4%) and refractory ischemia (24.2%). Revascularization (surgical or PCI) was performed in 74 patients (77.9%). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 34.7%. Univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality included (odds ratio [95% CI]) age (OR 1.06 [1.01–1.11] for every year increase in age); diabetes (OR 3.68 [1.51–8.92]) and cardiogenic shock at presentation (OR 4.85 [1.92–12.2]). Furthermore, prior CABG (OR 0.12 [0.04–0.34]), and in-hospital revascularization (OR 0.05 [0.01–0.189]) was protective against mortality. In the multivariate analysis, independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were age (OR 1.13 [1.05–1.22] for every year increase in age); diabetes (OR 6.35 [1.61–24.97]) and cardiogenic shock at presentation (OR 10.0 [2.33–42.95]). Again, revascularization during hospitalization (OR 0.02 [0.003–0.12]) conferred a protective effect. The overall complication rate was low (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring IABC represent a high-risk group with substantial in-hospital mortality. Despite this high mortality, over two-thirds of patients do leave the hospital alive, suggesting that IABC is a feasible therapeutic device, even in a developing country. BioMed Central 2004-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC535904/ /pubmed/15574201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-4-22 Text en Copyright © 2004 Jafary et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jafary, Fahim H
Khan, Sohail A
Kumar, Haresh
Malik, Numaan F
Kazmi, Khawar A
Dhakam, Sajid
Shafquat, Azam
Hameed, Aamir
Tai, Javed
Nadeem, Najaf
Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality
title Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality
title_full Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality
title_fullStr Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality
title_full_unstemmed Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality
title_short Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality
title_sort survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC535904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15574201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-4-22
work_keys_str_mv AT jafaryfahimh survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT khansohaila survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT kumarharesh survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT maliknumaanf survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT kazmikhawara survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT dhakamsajid survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT shafquatazam survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT hameedaamir survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT taijaved survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality
AT nadeemnajaf survivalofpatientstreatedwithintraaorticballooncounterpulsationatatertiarycarecenterinpakistanpatientcharacteristicsandpredictorsofinhospitalmortality