Cargando…

Comparing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use with or without Including Prayer as a Modality in a Local and Diverse United States Jurisdiction

OBJECTIVES: Few studies to date have examined the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a local, ethnically diverse population in the United States (U.S.). Fewer have addressed the differences in their use based on inclusion or exclusion of prayer as a modality. Variable def...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robles, Brenda, Upchurch, Dawn M., Kuo, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00056
_version_ 1782516350746361856
author Robles, Brenda
Upchurch, Dawn M.
Kuo, Tony
author_facet Robles, Brenda
Upchurch, Dawn M.
Kuo, Tony
author_sort Robles, Brenda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Few studies to date have examined the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a local, ethnically diverse population in the United States (U.S.). Fewer have addressed the differences in their use based on inclusion or exclusion of prayer as a modality. Variable definitions of CAM are known to affect public health surveillance (i.e., continuous, systematic data collection, analysis, and interpretation) or benchmarking (i.e., identifying and comparing key indicators of health to inform community planning) related to this non-mainstream collection of health and wellness therapies. The present study sought to better understand how including or excluding prayer could affect reporting of CAM use among residents of a large, urban U.S. jurisdiction. DESIGN: Using population-weighted data from a cross-sectional Internet panel survey collected as part of a larger countywide population health survey, the study compared use of CAM based on whether prayer or no prayer was included in its definition. Patterns of CAM use by socio-demographic characteristics were described for the two operationalized definitions. Multivariable binomial regression analyses were performed to control for gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, employment, income, and health insurance status. One of the analyses explored the associations between CAM use and racial/ethnic characteristics in the study sample. SETTING: Los Angeles County, California. SUBJECTS: A socio-demographically diverse sample of Los Angeles County residents. OUTCOME MEASURES: CAM use (with prayer) and CAM use (excluding prayer). RESULTS: Blacks were among the highest users of CAM when compared to Whites, especially when prayer was included as a CAM modality. Regardless of prayer inclusion, being a woman predicted higher use of CAM. CONCLUSIONS: How CAM is defined matters in gauging the utilization of this non-mainstream collection of therapies. Given that surveillance and/or benchmarking data are often used to inform resource allocation and planning decisions, results from the present study suggest that when prayer is included as part of the CAM definition, utilization/volume estimates of its use increased correspondingly, especially among non-White residents of the region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5359242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53592422017-04-04 Comparing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use with or without Including Prayer as a Modality in a Local and Diverse United States Jurisdiction Robles, Brenda Upchurch, Dawn M. Kuo, Tony Front Public Health Public Health OBJECTIVES: Few studies to date have examined the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a local, ethnically diverse population in the United States (U.S.). Fewer have addressed the differences in their use based on inclusion or exclusion of prayer as a modality. Variable definitions of CAM are known to affect public health surveillance (i.e., continuous, systematic data collection, analysis, and interpretation) or benchmarking (i.e., identifying and comparing key indicators of health to inform community planning) related to this non-mainstream collection of health and wellness therapies. The present study sought to better understand how including or excluding prayer could affect reporting of CAM use among residents of a large, urban U.S. jurisdiction. DESIGN: Using population-weighted data from a cross-sectional Internet panel survey collected as part of a larger countywide population health survey, the study compared use of CAM based on whether prayer or no prayer was included in its definition. Patterns of CAM use by socio-demographic characteristics were described for the two operationalized definitions. Multivariable binomial regression analyses were performed to control for gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, employment, income, and health insurance status. One of the analyses explored the associations between CAM use and racial/ethnic characteristics in the study sample. SETTING: Los Angeles County, California. SUBJECTS: A socio-demographically diverse sample of Los Angeles County residents. OUTCOME MEASURES: CAM use (with prayer) and CAM use (excluding prayer). RESULTS: Blacks were among the highest users of CAM when compared to Whites, especially when prayer was included as a CAM modality. Regardless of prayer inclusion, being a woman predicted higher use of CAM. CONCLUSIONS: How CAM is defined matters in gauging the utilization of this non-mainstream collection of therapies. Given that surveillance and/or benchmarking data are often used to inform resource allocation and planning decisions, results from the present study suggest that when prayer is included as part of the CAM definition, utilization/volume estimates of its use increased correspondingly, especially among non-White residents of the region. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5359242/ /pubmed/28377918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00056 Text en Copyright © 2017 Robles, Upchurch and Kuo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Robles, Brenda
Upchurch, Dawn M.
Kuo, Tony
Comparing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use with or without Including Prayer as a Modality in a Local and Diverse United States Jurisdiction
title Comparing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use with or without Including Prayer as a Modality in a Local and Diverse United States Jurisdiction
title_full Comparing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use with or without Including Prayer as a Modality in a Local and Diverse United States Jurisdiction
title_fullStr Comparing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use with or without Including Prayer as a Modality in a Local and Diverse United States Jurisdiction
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use with or without Including Prayer as a Modality in a Local and Diverse United States Jurisdiction
title_short Comparing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use with or without Including Prayer as a Modality in a Local and Diverse United States Jurisdiction
title_sort comparing complementary and alternative medicine use with or without including prayer as a modality in a local and diverse united states jurisdiction
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00056
work_keys_str_mv AT roblesbrenda comparingcomplementaryandalternativemedicineusewithorwithoutincludingprayerasamodalityinalocalanddiverseunitedstatesjurisdiction
AT upchurchdawnm comparingcomplementaryandalternativemedicineusewithorwithoutincludingprayerasamodalityinalocalanddiverseunitedstatesjurisdiction
AT kuotony comparingcomplementaryandalternativemedicineusewithorwithoutincludingprayerasamodalityinalocalanddiverseunitedstatesjurisdiction