Cargando…

Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an important tool in pathogen detection. However, the use of different qPCR components, calibration materials and DNA extraction methods reduces comparability between laboratories, which can result in false diagnosis and discrepancies in patient care. The wider establishme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavšič, Jernej, Devonshire, Alison, Blejec, Andrej, Foy, Carole A., Van Heuverswyn, Fran, Jones, Gerwyn M., Schimmel, Heinz, Žel, Jana, Huggett, Jim F., Redshaw, Nicholas, Karczmarczyk, Maria, Mozioğlu, Erkan, Akyürek, Sema, Akgöz, Müslüm, Milavec, Mojca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28124757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0
_version_ 1782516378387873792
author Pavšič, Jernej
Devonshire, Alison
Blejec, Andrej
Foy, Carole A.
Van Heuverswyn, Fran
Jones, Gerwyn M.
Schimmel, Heinz
Žel, Jana
Huggett, Jim F.
Redshaw, Nicholas
Karczmarczyk, Maria
Mozioğlu, Erkan
Akyürek, Sema
Akgöz, Müslüm
Milavec, Mojca
author_facet Pavšič, Jernej
Devonshire, Alison
Blejec, Andrej
Foy, Carole A.
Van Heuverswyn, Fran
Jones, Gerwyn M.
Schimmel, Heinz
Žel, Jana
Huggett, Jim F.
Redshaw, Nicholas
Karczmarczyk, Maria
Mozioğlu, Erkan
Akyürek, Sema
Akgöz, Müslüm
Milavec, Mojca
author_sort Pavšič, Jernej
collection PubMed
description Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an important tool in pathogen detection. However, the use of different qPCR components, calibration materials and DNA extraction methods reduces comparability between laboratories, which can result in false diagnosis and discrepancies in patient care. The wider establishment of a metrological framework for nucleic acid tests could improve the degree of standardisation of pathogen detection and the quantification methods applied in the clinical context. To achieve this, accurate methods need to be developed and implemented as reference measurement procedures, and to facilitate characterisation of suitable certified reference materials. Digital PCR (dPCR) has already been used for pathogen quantification by analysing nucleic acids. Although dPCR has the potential to provide robust and accurate quantification of nucleic acids, further assessment of its actual performance characteristics is needed before it can be implemented in a metrological framework, and to allow adequate estimation of measurement uncertainties. Here, four laboratories demonstrated reproducibility (expanded measurement uncertainties below 15%) of dPCR for quantification of DNA from human cytomegalovirus, with no calibration to a common reference material. Using whole-virus material and extracted DNA, an intermediate precision (coefficients of variation below 25%) between three consecutive experiments was noted. Furthermore, discrepancies in estimated mean DNA copy number concentrations between laboratories were less than twofold, with DNA extraction as the main source of variability. These data demonstrate that dPCR offers a repeatable and reproducible method for quantification of viral DNA, and due to its satisfactory performance should be considered as candidate for reference methods for implementation in a metrological framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5359388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53593882017-04-04 Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA Pavšič, Jernej Devonshire, Alison Blejec, Andrej Foy, Carole A. Van Heuverswyn, Fran Jones, Gerwyn M. Schimmel, Heinz Žel, Jana Huggett, Jim F. Redshaw, Nicholas Karczmarczyk, Maria Mozioğlu, Erkan Akyürek, Sema Akgöz, Müslüm Milavec, Mojca Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an important tool in pathogen detection. However, the use of different qPCR components, calibration materials and DNA extraction methods reduces comparability between laboratories, which can result in false diagnosis and discrepancies in patient care. The wider establishment of a metrological framework for nucleic acid tests could improve the degree of standardisation of pathogen detection and the quantification methods applied in the clinical context. To achieve this, accurate methods need to be developed and implemented as reference measurement procedures, and to facilitate characterisation of suitable certified reference materials. Digital PCR (dPCR) has already been used for pathogen quantification by analysing nucleic acids. Although dPCR has the potential to provide robust and accurate quantification of nucleic acids, further assessment of its actual performance characteristics is needed before it can be implemented in a metrological framework, and to allow adequate estimation of measurement uncertainties. Here, four laboratories demonstrated reproducibility (expanded measurement uncertainties below 15%) of dPCR for quantification of DNA from human cytomegalovirus, with no calibration to a common reference material. Using whole-virus material and extracted DNA, an intermediate precision (coefficients of variation below 25%) between three consecutive experiments was noted. Furthermore, discrepancies in estimated mean DNA copy number concentrations between laboratories were less than twofold, with DNA extraction as the main source of variability. These data demonstrate that dPCR offers a repeatable and reproducible method for quantification of viral DNA, and due to its satisfactory performance should be considered as candidate for reference methods for implementation in a metrological framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-01-26 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5359388/ /pubmed/28124757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Pavšič, Jernej
Devonshire, Alison
Blejec, Andrej
Foy, Carole A.
Van Heuverswyn, Fran
Jones, Gerwyn M.
Schimmel, Heinz
Žel, Jana
Huggett, Jim F.
Redshaw, Nicholas
Karczmarczyk, Maria
Mozioğlu, Erkan
Akyürek, Sema
Akgöz, Müslüm
Milavec, Mojca
Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA
title Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA
title_full Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA
title_fullStr Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA
title_full_unstemmed Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA
title_short Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA
title_sort inter-laboratory assessment of different digital pcr platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus dna
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28124757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pavsicjernej interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT devonshirealison interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT blejecandrej interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT foycarolea interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT vanheuverswynfran interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT jonesgerwynm interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT schimmelheinz interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT zeljana interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT huggettjimf interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT redshawnicholas interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT karczmarczykmaria interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT moziogluerkan interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT akyureksema interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT akgozmuslum interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna
AT milavecmojca interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna