Cargando…
Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an important tool in pathogen detection. However, the use of different qPCR components, calibration materials and DNA extraction methods reduces comparability between laboratories, which can result in false diagnosis and discrepancies in patient care. The wider establishme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28124757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0 |
_version_ | 1782516378387873792 |
---|---|
author | Pavšič, Jernej Devonshire, Alison Blejec, Andrej Foy, Carole A. Van Heuverswyn, Fran Jones, Gerwyn M. Schimmel, Heinz Žel, Jana Huggett, Jim F. Redshaw, Nicholas Karczmarczyk, Maria Mozioğlu, Erkan Akyürek, Sema Akgöz, Müslüm Milavec, Mojca |
author_facet | Pavšič, Jernej Devonshire, Alison Blejec, Andrej Foy, Carole A. Van Heuverswyn, Fran Jones, Gerwyn M. Schimmel, Heinz Žel, Jana Huggett, Jim F. Redshaw, Nicholas Karczmarczyk, Maria Mozioğlu, Erkan Akyürek, Sema Akgöz, Müslüm Milavec, Mojca |
author_sort | Pavšič, Jernej |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an important tool in pathogen detection. However, the use of different qPCR components, calibration materials and DNA extraction methods reduces comparability between laboratories, which can result in false diagnosis and discrepancies in patient care. The wider establishment of a metrological framework for nucleic acid tests could improve the degree of standardisation of pathogen detection and the quantification methods applied in the clinical context. To achieve this, accurate methods need to be developed and implemented as reference measurement procedures, and to facilitate characterisation of suitable certified reference materials. Digital PCR (dPCR) has already been used for pathogen quantification by analysing nucleic acids. Although dPCR has the potential to provide robust and accurate quantification of nucleic acids, further assessment of its actual performance characteristics is needed before it can be implemented in a metrological framework, and to allow adequate estimation of measurement uncertainties. Here, four laboratories demonstrated reproducibility (expanded measurement uncertainties below 15%) of dPCR for quantification of DNA from human cytomegalovirus, with no calibration to a common reference material. Using whole-virus material and extracted DNA, an intermediate precision (coefficients of variation below 25%) between three consecutive experiments was noted. Furthermore, discrepancies in estimated mean DNA copy number concentrations between laboratories were less than twofold, with DNA extraction as the main source of variability. These data demonstrate that dPCR offers a repeatable and reproducible method for quantification of viral DNA, and due to its satisfactory performance should be considered as candidate for reference methods for implementation in a metrological framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5359388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53593882017-04-04 Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA Pavšič, Jernej Devonshire, Alison Blejec, Andrej Foy, Carole A. Van Heuverswyn, Fran Jones, Gerwyn M. Schimmel, Heinz Žel, Jana Huggett, Jim F. Redshaw, Nicholas Karczmarczyk, Maria Mozioğlu, Erkan Akyürek, Sema Akgöz, Müslüm Milavec, Mojca Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an important tool in pathogen detection. However, the use of different qPCR components, calibration materials and DNA extraction methods reduces comparability between laboratories, which can result in false diagnosis and discrepancies in patient care. The wider establishment of a metrological framework for nucleic acid tests could improve the degree of standardisation of pathogen detection and the quantification methods applied in the clinical context. To achieve this, accurate methods need to be developed and implemented as reference measurement procedures, and to facilitate characterisation of suitable certified reference materials. Digital PCR (dPCR) has already been used for pathogen quantification by analysing nucleic acids. Although dPCR has the potential to provide robust and accurate quantification of nucleic acids, further assessment of its actual performance characteristics is needed before it can be implemented in a metrological framework, and to allow adequate estimation of measurement uncertainties. Here, four laboratories demonstrated reproducibility (expanded measurement uncertainties below 15%) of dPCR for quantification of DNA from human cytomegalovirus, with no calibration to a common reference material. Using whole-virus material and extracted DNA, an intermediate precision (coefficients of variation below 25%) between three consecutive experiments was noted. Furthermore, discrepancies in estimated mean DNA copy number concentrations between laboratories were less than twofold, with DNA extraction as the main source of variability. These data demonstrate that dPCR offers a repeatable and reproducible method for quantification of viral DNA, and due to its satisfactory performance should be considered as candidate for reference methods for implementation in a metrological framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-01-26 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5359388/ /pubmed/28124757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Pavšič, Jernej Devonshire, Alison Blejec, Andrej Foy, Carole A. Van Heuverswyn, Fran Jones, Gerwyn M. Schimmel, Heinz Žel, Jana Huggett, Jim F. Redshaw, Nicholas Karczmarczyk, Maria Mozioğlu, Erkan Akyürek, Sema Akgöz, Müslüm Milavec, Mojca Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA |
title | Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA |
title_full | Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA |
title_fullStr | Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA |
title_short | Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA |
title_sort | inter-laboratory assessment of different digital pcr platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus dna |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28124757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pavsicjernej interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT devonshirealison interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT blejecandrej interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT foycarolea interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT vanheuverswynfran interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT jonesgerwynm interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT schimmelheinz interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT zeljana interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT huggettjimf interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT redshawnicholas interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT karczmarczykmaria interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT moziogluerkan interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT akyureksema interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT akgozmuslum interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna AT milavecmojca interlaboratoryassessmentofdifferentdigitalpcrplatformsforquantificationofhumancytomegalovirusdna |