Cargando…

Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy

Experimental philosophy brings empirical methods to philosophy. These methods are used to probe how people think about philosophically interesting things such as knowledge, morality, and freedom. This paper explores the contribution that qualitative methods have to make in this enterprise. I argue t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Andow, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28392629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1224826
_version_ 1782516435307724800
author Andow, James
author_facet Andow, James
author_sort Andow, James
collection PubMed
description Experimental philosophy brings empirical methods to philosophy. These methods are used to probe how people think about philosophically interesting things such as knowledge, morality, and freedom. This paper explores the contribution that qualitative methods have to make in this enterprise. I argue that qualitative methods have the potential to make a much greater contribution than they have so far. Along the way, I acknowledge a few types of resistance that proponents of qualitative methods in experimental philosophy might encounter, and provide reasons to think they are ill-founded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5359736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53597362017-04-05 Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy Andow, James Philos Psychol Articles Experimental philosophy brings empirical methods to philosophy. These methods are used to probe how people think about philosophically interesting things such as knowledge, morality, and freedom. This paper explores the contribution that qualitative methods have to make in this enterprise. I argue that qualitative methods have the potential to make a much greater contribution than they have so far. Along the way, I acknowledge a few types of resistance that proponents of qualitative methods in experimental philosophy might encounter, and provide reasons to think they are ill-founded. Routledge 2016-11-16 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5359736/ /pubmed/28392629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1224826 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Articles
Andow, James
Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy
title Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy
title_full Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy
title_fullStr Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy
title_short Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy
title_sort qualitative tools and experimental philosophy
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28392629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1224826
work_keys_str_mv AT andowjames qualitativetoolsandexperimentalphilosophy