Cargando…
Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy
Experimental philosophy brings empirical methods to philosophy. These methods are used to probe how people think about philosophically interesting things such as knowledge, morality, and freedom. This paper explores the contribution that qualitative methods have to make in this enterprise. I argue t...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28392629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1224826 |
_version_ | 1782516435307724800 |
---|---|
author | Andow, James |
author_facet | Andow, James |
author_sort | Andow, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Experimental philosophy brings empirical methods to philosophy. These methods are used to probe how people think about philosophically interesting things such as knowledge, morality, and freedom. This paper explores the contribution that qualitative methods have to make in this enterprise. I argue that qualitative methods have the potential to make a much greater contribution than they have so far. Along the way, I acknowledge a few types of resistance that proponents of qualitative methods in experimental philosophy might encounter, and provide reasons to think they are ill-founded. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5359736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53597362017-04-05 Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy Andow, James Philos Psychol Articles Experimental philosophy brings empirical methods to philosophy. These methods are used to probe how people think about philosophically interesting things such as knowledge, morality, and freedom. This paper explores the contribution that qualitative methods have to make in this enterprise. I argue that qualitative methods have the potential to make a much greater contribution than they have so far. Along the way, I acknowledge a few types of resistance that proponents of qualitative methods in experimental philosophy might encounter, and provide reasons to think they are ill-founded. Routledge 2016-11-16 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5359736/ /pubmed/28392629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1224826 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Articles Andow, James Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy |
title | Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy |
title_full | Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy |
title_fullStr | Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy |
title_short | Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy |
title_sort | qualitative tools and experimental philosophy |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28392629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1224826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andowjames qualitativetoolsandexperimentalphilosophy |