Cargando…
Prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy
Post-instability arthropathy may commonly develop in high-risk patients with a history of recurrent glenohumeral instability, both with and without surgical stabilization. Classically related to anterior shoulder instability, the incidence and rates of arthritic progression may vary widely. Radiogra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i3.229 |
_version_ | 1782516441738641408 |
---|---|
author | Waterman, Brian R Kilcoyne, Kelly G Parada, Stephen A Eichinger, Josef K |
author_facet | Waterman, Brian R Kilcoyne, Kelly G Parada, Stephen A Eichinger, Josef K |
author_sort | Waterman, Brian R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Post-instability arthropathy may commonly develop in high-risk patients with a history of recurrent glenohumeral instability, both with and without surgical stabilization. Classically related to anterior shoulder instability, the incidence and rates of arthritic progression may vary widely. Radiographic arthritic changes may be present in up to two-thirds of patients after primary Bankart repair and 30% after Latarjet procedure, with increasing rates associated with recurrent dislocation history, prominent implant position, non-anatomic reconstruction, and/or lateralized bone graft placement. However, the presence radiographic arthrosis does not predict poor patient-reported function. After exhausting conservative measures, both joint-preserving and arthroplasty surgical options may be considered depending on a combination of patient-specific and anatomic factors. Arthroscopic procedures are optimally indicated for individuals with focal disease and may yield superior symptomatic relief when combined with treatment of combined shoulder pathology. For more advanced secondary arthropathy, total shoulder arthroplasty remains the most reliable option, although the clinical outcomes, wear characteristics, and implant survivorship remains a concern among active, young patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5359759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53597592017-03-30 Prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy Waterman, Brian R Kilcoyne, Kelly G Parada, Stephen A Eichinger, Josef K World J Orthop Review Post-instability arthropathy may commonly develop in high-risk patients with a history of recurrent glenohumeral instability, both with and without surgical stabilization. Classically related to anterior shoulder instability, the incidence and rates of arthritic progression may vary widely. Radiographic arthritic changes may be present in up to two-thirds of patients after primary Bankart repair and 30% after Latarjet procedure, with increasing rates associated with recurrent dislocation history, prominent implant position, non-anatomic reconstruction, and/or lateralized bone graft placement. However, the presence radiographic arthrosis does not predict poor patient-reported function. After exhausting conservative measures, both joint-preserving and arthroplasty surgical options may be considered depending on a combination of patient-specific and anatomic factors. Arthroscopic procedures are optimally indicated for individuals with focal disease and may yield superior symptomatic relief when combined with treatment of combined shoulder pathology. For more advanced secondary arthropathy, total shoulder arthroplasty remains the most reliable option, although the clinical outcomes, wear characteristics, and implant survivorship remains a concern among active, young patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5359759/ /pubmed/28361016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i3.229 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Review Waterman, Brian R Kilcoyne, Kelly G Parada, Stephen A Eichinger, Josef K Prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy |
title | Prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy |
title_full | Prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy |
title_fullStr | Prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy |
title_short | Prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy |
title_sort | prevention and management of post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i3.229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watermanbrianr preventionandmanagementofpostinstabilityglenohumeralarthropathy AT kilcoynekellyg preventionandmanagementofpostinstabilityglenohumeralarthropathy AT paradastephena preventionandmanagementofpostinstabilityglenohumeralarthropathy AT eichingerjosefk preventionandmanagementofpostinstabilityglenohumeralarthropathy |