Cargando…

Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency

This article aims to highlight the positions of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency regarding use and marketing of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) products, and how these have changed over recent years. In 2013, warnings from both agencies advised against use of HES in criti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiedermann, Christian J., Eisendle, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-016-0090-6
_version_ 1782516452411047936
author Wiedermann, Christian J.
Eisendle, Klaus
author_facet Wiedermann, Christian J.
Eisendle, Klaus
author_sort Wiedermann, Christian J.
collection PubMed
description This article aims to highlight the positions of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency regarding use and marketing of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) products, and how these have changed over recent years. In 2013, warnings from both agencies advised against use of HES in critically ill patients, including patients with sepsis, when several large randomized controlled trials on volume resuscitation in critical illness failed to observe clinically beneficial effects of HES. In areas such as patient monitoring and requirements for further clinical trials, the FDA and EMA are very much in agreement in their recommendations. However, EMA guidance is generally more restrictive on HES usage compared to that from the FDA. Differences in data presented to regulatory authorities, bias in study results and inherent weakness of meta-analyses used for drug surveillance purposes, plus different risk-management approaches used by the two regulatory authorities, likely contribute to different outcomes in their regulations concerning use of HES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5359805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53598052017-03-22 Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency Wiedermann, Christian J. Eisendle, Klaus J Pharm Policy Pract Policy Analysis This article aims to highlight the positions of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency regarding use and marketing of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) products, and how these have changed over recent years. In 2013, warnings from both agencies advised against use of HES in critically ill patients, including patients with sepsis, when several large randomized controlled trials on volume resuscitation in critical illness failed to observe clinically beneficial effects of HES. In areas such as patient monitoring and requirements for further clinical trials, the FDA and EMA are very much in agreement in their recommendations. However, EMA guidance is generally more restrictive on HES usage compared to that from the FDA. Differences in data presented to regulatory authorities, bias in study results and inherent weakness of meta-analyses used for drug surveillance purposes, plus different risk-management approaches used by the two regulatory authorities, likely contribute to different outcomes in their regulations concerning use of HES. BioMed Central 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5359805/ /pubmed/28331624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-016-0090-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Policy Analysis
Wiedermann, Christian J.
Eisendle, Klaus
Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency
title Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency
title_full Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency
title_fullStr Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency
title_short Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency
title_sort comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the food and drug administration and the european medicines agency
topic Policy Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-016-0090-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wiedermannchristianj comparisonofhydroxyethylstarchregulatorysummariesfromthefoodanddrugadministrationandtheeuropeanmedicinesagency
AT eisendleklaus comparisonofhydroxyethylstarchregulatorysummariesfromthefoodanddrugadministrationandtheeuropeanmedicinesagency