Cargando…
Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency
This article aims to highlight the positions of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency regarding use and marketing of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) products, and how these have changed over recent years. In 2013, warnings from both agencies advised against use of HES in criti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-016-0090-6 |
_version_ | 1782516452411047936 |
---|---|
author | Wiedermann, Christian J. Eisendle, Klaus |
author_facet | Wiedermann, Christian J. Eisendle, Klaus |
author_sort | Wiedermann, Christian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article aims to highlight the positions of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency regarding use and marketing of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) products, and how these have changed over recent years. In 2013, warnings from both agencies advised against use of HES in critically ill patients, including patients with sepsis, when several large randomized controlled trials on volume resuscitation in critical illness failed to observe clinically beneficial effects of HES. In areas such as patient monitoring and requirements for further clinical trials, the FDA and EMA are very much in agreement in their recommendations. However, EMA guidance is generally more restrictive on HES usage compared to that from the FDA. Differences in data presented to regulatory authorities, bias in study results and inherent weakness of meta-analyses used for drug surveillance purposes, plus different risk-management approaches used by the two regulatory authorities, likely contribute to different outcomes in their regulations concerning use of HES. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5359805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53598052017-03-22 Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency Wiedermann, Christian J. Eisendle, Klaus J Pharm Policy Pract Policy Analysis This article aims to highlight the positions of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency regarding use and marketing of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) products, and how these have changed over recent years. In 2013, warnings from both agencies advised against use of HES in critically ill patients, including patients with sepsis, when several large randomized controlled trials on volume resuscitation in critical illness failed to observe clinically beneficial effects of HES. In areas such as patient monitoring and requirements for further clinical trials, the FDA and EMA are very much in agreement in their recommendations. However, EMA guidance is generally more restrictive on HES usage compared to that from the FDA. Differences in data presented to regulatory authorities, bias in study results and inherent weakness of meta-analyses used for drug surveillance purposes, plus different risk-management approaches used by the two regulatory authorities, likely contribute to different outcomes in their regulations concerning use of HES. BioMed Central 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5359805/ /pubmed/28331624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-016-0090-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Policy Analysis Wiedermann, Christian J. Eisendle, Klaus Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency |
title | Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency |
title_full | Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency |
title_fullStr | Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency |
title_short | Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency |
title_sort | comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the food and drug administration and the european medicines agency |
topic | Policy Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-016-0090-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiedermannchristianj comparisonofhydroxyethylstarchregulatorysummariesfromthefoodanddrugadministrationandtheeuropeanmedicinesagency AT eisendleklaus comparisonofhydroxyethylstarchregulatorysummariesfromthefoodanddrugadministrationandtheeuropeanmedicinesagency |