Cargando…
Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function
BACKGROUND: Physical function (PF) is a core patient-reported outcome domain in clinical trials in rheumatic diseases. Frequently used PF measures have ceiling effects, leading to large sample size requirements and low sensitivity to change. In most of these instruments, the response category that i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1273-5 |
_version_ | 1782516456482668544 |
---|---|
author | Liegl, Gregor Gandek, Barbara Fischer, H. Felix Bjorner, Jakob B. Ware, John E. Rose, Matthias Fries, James F. Nolte, Sandra |
author_facet | Liegl, Gregor Gandek, Barbara Fischer, H. Felix Bjorner, Jakob B. Ware, John E. Rose, Matthias Fries, James F. Nolte, Sandra |
author_sort | Liegl, Gregor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physical function (PF) is a core patient-reported outcome domain in clinical trials in rheumatic diseases. Frequently used PF measures have ceiling effects, leading to large sample size requirements and low sensitivity to change. In most of these instruments, the response category that indicates the highest PF level is the statement that one is able to perform a given physical activity without any limitations or difficulty. This study investigates whether using an item format with an extended response scale, allowing respondents to state that the performance of an activity is easy or very easy, increases the range of precise measurement of self-reported PF. METHODS: Three five-item PF short forms were constructed from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) wave 1 data. All forms included the same physical activities but varied in item stem and response scale: format A (“Are you able to …”; “without any difficulty”/“unable to do”); format B (“Does your health now limit you …”; “not at all”/“cannot do”); format C (“How difficult is it for you to …”; “very easy”/“impossible”). Each short-form item was answered by 2217–2835 subjects. We evaluated unidimensionality and estimated a graded response model for the 15 short-form items and remaining 119 items of the PROMIS PF bank to compare item and test information for the short forms along the PF continuum. We then used simulated data for five groups with different PF levels to illustrate differences in scoring precision between the short forms using different item formats. RESULTS: Sufficient unidimensionality of all short-form items and the original PF item bank was supported. Compared to formats A and B, format C increased the range of reliable measurement by about 0.5 standard deviations on the positive side of the PF continuum of the sample, provided more item information, and was more useful in distinguishing known groups with above-average functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Using an item format with an extended response scale is an efficient option to increase the measurement range of self-reported physical function without changing the content of the measure or affecting the latent construct of the instrument. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-017-1273-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5359818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53598182017-03-22 Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function Liegl, Gregor Gandek, Barbara Fischer, H. Felix Bjorner, Jakob B. Ware, John E. Rose, Matthias Fries, James F. Nolte, Sandra Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical function (PF) is a core patient-reported outcome domain in clinical trials in rheumatic diseases. Frequently used PF measures have ceiling effects, leading to large sample size requirements and low sensitivity to change. In most of these instruments, the response category that indicates the highest PF level is the statement that one is able to perform a given physical activity without any limitations or difficulty. This study investigates whether using an item format with an extended response scale, allowing respondents to state that the performance of an activity is easy or very easy, increases the range of precise measurement of self-reported PF. METHODS: Three five-item PF short forms were constructed from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) wave 1 data. All forms included the same physical activities but varied in item stem and response scale: format A (“Are you able to …”; “without any difficulty”/“unable to do”); format B (“Does your health now limit you …”; “not at all”/“cannot do”); format C (“How difficult is it for you to …”; “very easy”/“impossible”). Each short-form item was answered by 2217–2835 subjects. We evaluated unidimensionality and estimated a graded response model for the 15 short-form items and remaining 119 items of the PROMIS PF bank to compare item and test information for the short forms along the PF continuum. We then used simulated data for five groups with different PF levels to illustrate differences in scoring precision between the short forms using different item formats. RESULTS: Sufficient unidimensionality of all short-form items and the original PF item bank was supported. Compared to formats A and B, format C increased the range of reliable measurement by about 0.5 standard deviations on the positive side of the PF continuum of the sample, provided more item information, and was more useful in distinguishing known groups with above-average functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Using an item format with an extended response scale is an efficient option to increase the measurement range of self-reported physical function without changing the content of the measure or affecting the latent construct of the instrument. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-017-1273-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5359818/ /pubmed/28320462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1273-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liegl, Gregor Gandek, Barbara Fischer, H. Felix Bjorner, Jakob B. Ware, John E. Rose, Matthias Fries, James F. Nolte, Sandra Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function |
title | Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function |
title_full | Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function |
title_fullStr | Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function |
title_full_unstemmed | Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function |
title_short | Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function |
title_sort | varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1273-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lieglgregor varyingtheitemformatimprovedtherangeofmeasurementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresassessingphysicalfunction AT gandekbarbara varyingtheitemformatimprovedtherangeofmeasurementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresassessingphysicalfunction AT fischerhfelix varyingtheitemformatimprovedtherangeofmeasurementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresassessingphysicalfunction AT bjornerjakobb varyingtheitemformatimprovedtherangeofmeasurementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresassessingphysicalfunction AT warejohne varyingtheitemformatimprovedtherangeofmeasurementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresassessingphysicalfunction AT rosematthias varyingtheitemformatimprovedtherangeofmeasurementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresassessingphysicalfunction AT friesjamesf varyingtheitemformatimprovedtherangeofmeasurementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresassessingphysicalfunction AT noltesandra varyingtheitemformatimprovedtherangeofmeasurementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresassessingphysicalfunction |