Cargando…

Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects

BACKGROUND: There have been concerns that Electromagnetic security systems such as walk-through metal detectors (WTMDs) can potentially cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) in certain active medical devices including implantable cardiac pacemakers and implantable neurostimulators. Incidents of E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guag, Joshua, Addissie, Bisrat, Witters, Donald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0328-9
_version_ 1782516478840406016
author Guag, Joshua
Addissie, Bisrat
Witters, Donald
author_facet Guag, Joshua
Addissie, Bisrat
Witters, Donald
author_sort Guag, Joshua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There have been concerns that Electromagnetic security systems such as walk-through metal detectors (WTMDs) can potentially cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) in certain active medical devices including implantable cardiac pacemakers and implantable neurostimulators. Incidents of EMI between WTMDs and active medical devices also known as personal medical electronic devices (PMED) continue to be reported. This paper reports on emission measurements of sample WTMDs and testing of 20 PMEDs in a WTMD simulation system. METHODS: Magnetic fields from sample WTMD systems were characterized for emissions and exposure of certain PMEDs. A WTMD simulator system designed and evaluated by FDA in previous studies was used to mimic the PMED exposures to the waveform from sample WTMDs. The simulation system allows for controlled PMED exposure enabling careful study with adjustable magnetic field strengths and exposure duration, and provides flexibility for PMED exposure at elevated levels in order to study EMI effects on the PMED. The PMED samples consisted of six implantable cardiac pacemakers, six implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), five implantable neurostimulators, and three insulin pumps. Each PMED was exposed in the simulator to the sample WTMD waveforms using methods based on appropriate consensus test standards for each of the device type. RESULTS: Testing the sample PMEDs using the WTMD simulator revealed EMI effects on two implantable pacemakers and one implantable neurostimulator for exposure field strength comparable to actual WTMD field strength. The observed effects were transient and the PMEDs returned to pre-exposure operation within a few seconds after removal from the simulated WTMD exposure fields. No EMI was observed for the sample ICDs or insulin pumps. CONCLUSION: The findings are consistent with earlier studies where certain sample PMEDs exhibited EMI effects. Clinical implications were not addressed in this study. Additional studies are needed to evaluate potential PMED EMI susceptibilities over a broader range of security systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5359895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53598952017-03-22 Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects Guag, Joshua Addissie, Bisrat Witters, Donald Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: There have been concerns that Electromagnetic security systems such as walk-through metal detectors (WTMDs) can potentially cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) in certain active medical devices including implantable cardiac pacemakers and implantable neurostimulators. Incidents of EMI between WTMDs and active medical devices also known as personal medical electronic devices (PMED) continue to be reported. This paper reports on emission measurements of sample WTMDs and testing of 20 PMEDs in a WTMD simulation system. METHODS: Magnetic fields from sample WTMD systems were characterized for emissions and exposure of certain PMEDs. A WTMD simulator system designed and evaluated by FDA in previous studies was used to mimic the PMED exposures to the waveform from sample WTMDs. The simulation system allows for controlled PMED exposure enabling careful study with adjustable magnetic field strengths and exposure duration, and provides flexibility for PMED exposure at elevated levels in order to study EMI effects on the PMED. The PMED samples consisted of six implantable cardiac pacemakers, six implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), five implantable neurostimulators, and three insulin pumps. Each PMED was exposed in the simulator to the sample WTMD waveforms using methods based on appropriate consensus test standards for each of the device type. RESULTS: Testing the sample PMEDs using the WTMD simulator revealed EMI effects on two implantable pacemakers and one implantable neurostimulator for exposure field strength comparable to actual WTMD field strength. The observed effects were transient and the PMEDs returned to pre-exposure operation within a few seconds after removal from the simulated WTMD exposure fields. No EMI was observed for the sample ICDs or insulin pumps. CONCLUSION: The findings are consistent with earlier studies where certain sample PMEDs exhibited EMI effects. Clinical implications were not addressed in this study. Additional studies are needed to evaluate potential PMED EMI susceptibilities over a broader range of security systems. BioMed Central 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5359895/ /pubmed/28320451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0328-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Guag, Joshua
Addissie, Bisrat
Witters, Donald
Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects
title Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects
title_full Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects
title_fullStr Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects
title_full_unstemmed Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects
title_short Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects
title_sort personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0328-9
work_keys_str_mv AT guagjoshua personalmedicalelectronicdevicesandwalkthroughmetaldetectorsecuritysystemsassessingelectromagneticinterferenceeffects
AT addissiebisrat personalmedicalelectronicdevicesandwalkthroughmetaldetectorsecuritysystemsassessingelectromagneticinterferenceeffects
AT wittersdonald personalmedicalelectronicdevicesandwalkthroughmetaldetectorsecuritysystemsassessingelectromagneticinterferenceeffects