Cargando…
Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
BACKGROUND: Although a model for shared decision-making is important for patient-centered care, decisional conflict can emerge when patients participate in the decision-making. A decision aid is proposed to provide information and to involve patients more comfortably in the decision-making process....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4 |
_version_ | 1782516519286079488 |
---|---|
author | Gong, Hyun Sik Park, Jin Woo Shin, Young Ho Kim, Kahyun Cho, Kwan Jae Baek, Goo Hyun |
author_facet | Gong, Hyun Sik Park, Jin Woo Shin, Young Ho Kim, Kahyun Cho, Kwan Jae Baek, Goo Hyun |
author_sort | Gong, Hyun Sik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although a model for shared decision-making is important for patient-centered care, decisional conflict can emerge when patients participate in the decision-making. A decision aid is proposed to provide information and to involve patients more comfortably in the decision-making process. We aimed to determine whether a decision aid helps patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) experience less decisional conflict regarding their decision-making for surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients with CTS were randomized into two groups. The test group was given a decision aid in addition to regular information and the control group regular information only. The decision aid consisted of a 6-min videoclip that explains diagnosis and information regarding surgery for CTS with other treatment options. We evaluated patients’ decisional conflict regarding surgery, knowledge about CTS, and symptom severity as measured by the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no difference in the decisional conflict scale (DCS) between both groups (p = 0.76). The test group had significantly better knowledge than the control group (p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the knowledge score and the DCS (p = 0.76). However, less severe symptoms were correlated with greater decisional conflict (r = −0.29, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found that a decision aid does not reduce decisional conflict in patients with CTS, although it can help them be better informed. This study suggests that although a decision-aid is effective for patient education, doctor-patient communication should be more emphasized for patients with less severe symptoms, as they can have greater decisional conflict. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SNUBH Registry 1510/317-003 Registered November 13, 2015 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5360048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53600482017-03-24 Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome Gong, Hyun Sik Park, Jin Woo Shin, Young Ho Kim, Kahyun Cho, Kwan Jae Baek, Goo Hyun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Although a model for shared decision-making is important for patient-centered care, decisional conflict can emerge when patients participate in the decision-making. A decision aid is proposed to provide information and to involve patients more comfortably in the decision-making process. We aimed to determine whether a decision aid helps patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) experience less decisional conflict regarding their decision-making for surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients with CTS were randomized into two groups. The test group was given a decision aid in addition to regular information and the control group regular information only. The decision aid consisted of a 6-min videoclip that explains diagnosis and information regarding surgery for CTS with other treatment options. We evaluated patients’ decisional conflict regarding surgery, knowledge about CTS, and symptom severity as measured by the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no difference in the decisional conflict scale (DCS) between both groups (p = 0.76). The test group had significantly better knowledge than the control group (p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the knowledge score and the DCS (p = 0.76). However, less severe symptoms were correlated with greater decisional conflict (r = −0.29, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found that a decision aid does not reduce decisional conflict in patients with CTS, although it can help them be better informed. This study suggests that although a decision-aid is effective for patient education, doctor-patient communication should be more emphasized for patients with less severe symptoms, as they can have greater decisional conflict. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SNUBH Registry 1510/317-003 Registered November 13, 2015 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5360048/ /pubmed/28320368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gong, Hyun Sik Park, Jin Woo Shin, Young Ho Kim, Kahyun Cho, Kwan Jae Baek, Goo Hyun Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome |
title | Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome |
title_full | Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome |
title_fullStr | Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome |
title_short | Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome |
title_sort | use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gonghyunsik useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome AT parkjinwoo useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome AT shinyoungho useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome AT kimkahyun useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome AT chokwanjae useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome AT baekgoohyun useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome |