Cargando…

Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

BACKGROUND: Although a model for shared decision-making is important for patient-centered care, decisional conflict can emerge when patients participate in the decision-making. A decision aid is proposed to provide information and to involve patients more comfortably in the decision-making process....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Hyun Sik, Park, Jin Woo, Shin, Young Ho, Kim, Kahyun, Cho, Kwan Jae, Baek, Goo Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4
_version_ 1782516519286079488
author Gong, Hyun Sik
Park, Jin Woo
Shin, Young Ho
Kim, Kahyun
Cho, Kwan Jae
Baek, Goo Hyun
author_facet Gong, Hyun Sik
Park, Jin Woo
Shin, Young Ho
Kim, Kahyun
Cho, Kwan Jae
Baek, Goo Hyun
author_sort Gong, Hyun Sik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although a model for shared decision-making is important for patient-centered care, decisional conflict can emerge when patients participate in the decision-making. A decision aid is proposed to provide information and to involve patients more comfortably in the decision-making process. We aimed to determine whether a decision aid helps patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) experience less decisional conflict regarding their decision-making for surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients with CTS were randomized into two groups. The test group was given a decision aid in addition to regular information and the control group regular information only. The decision aid consisted of a 6-min videoclip that explains diagnosis and information regarding surgery for CTS with other treatment options. We evaluated patients’ decisional conflict regarding surgery, knowledge about CTS, and symptom severity as measured by the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no difference in the decisional conflict scale (DCS) between both groups (p = 0.76). The test group had significantly better knowledge than the control group (p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the knowledge score and the DCS (p = 0.76). However, less severe symptoms were correlated with greater decisional conflict (r = −0.29, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found that a decision aid does not reduce decisional conflict in patients with CTS, although it can help them be better informed. This study suggests that although a decision-aid is effective for patient education, doctor-patient communication should be more emphasized for patients with less severe symptoms, as they can have greater decisional conflict. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SNUBH Registry 1510/317-003 Registered November 13, 2015 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5360048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53600482017-03-24 Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome Gong, Hyun Sik Park, Jin Woo Shin, Young Ho Kim, Kahyun Cho, Kwan Jae Baek, Goo Hyun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Although a model for shared decision-making is important for patient-centered care, decisional conflict can emerge when patients participate in the decision-making. A decision aid is proposed to provide information and to involve patients more comfortably in the decision-making process. We aimed to determine whether a decision aid helps patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) experience less decisional conflict regarding their decision-making for surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients with CTS were randomized into two groups. The test group was given a decision aid in addition to regular information and the control group regular information only. The decision aid consisted of a 6-min videoclip that explains diagnosis and information regarding surgery for CTS with other treatment options. We evaluated patients’ decisional conflict regarding surgery, knowledge about CTS, and symptom severity as measured by the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no difference in the decisional conflict scale (DCS) between both groups (p = 0.76). The test group had significantly better knowledge than the control group (p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the knowledge score and the DCS (p = 0.76). However, less severe symptoms were correlated with greater decisional conflict (r = −0.29, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found that a decision aid does not reduce decisional conflict in patients with CTS, although it can help them be better informed. This study suggests that although a decision-aid is effective for patient education, doctor-patient communication should be more emphasized for patients with less severe symptoms, as they can have greater decisional conflict. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SNUBH Registry 1510/317-003 Registered November 13, 2015 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5360048/ /pubmed/28320368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gong, Hyun Sik
Park, Jin Woo
Shin, Young Ho
Kim, Kahyun
Cho, Kwan Jae
Baek, Goo Hyun
Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
title Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
title_full Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
title_fullStr Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
title_short Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
title_sort use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gonghyunsik useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT parkjinwoo useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT shinyoungho useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT kimkahyun useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT chokwanjae useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT baekgoohyun useofadecisionaiddidnotdecreasedecisionalconflictinpatientswithcarpaltunnelsyndrome