Cargando…
Mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Mindfulness based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly used to help patients cope with physical and mental long-term conditions (LTCs). Epilepsy is associated with a range of mental and physical comorbidities that have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QOL), but it is not clear w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0832-3 |
_version_ | 1782516521294102528 |
---|---|
author | Wood, Karen Lawrence, Maggie Jani, Bhautesh Simpson, Robert Mercer, Stewart W. |
author_facet | Wood, Karen Lawrence, Maggie Jani, Bhautesh Simpson, Robert Mercer, Stewart W. |
author_sort | Wood, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mindfulness based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly used to help patients cope with physical and mental long-term conditions (LTCs). Epilepsy is associated with a range of mental and physical comorbidities that have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QOL), but it is not clear whether MBIs can help. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effectiveness of MBIs in people with epilepsy. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, Allied and Complimentary Medicine Database, and PsychInfo were searched in March 2016. These databases were searched using a combination of subject headings where available and keywords in the title and abstracts. We also searched the reference lists of related reviews. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 231 participants were included. The interventions were tested in the USA (n = 171) and China (Hong Kong) (n = 60). Significant improvements were reported in depression symptoms, quality of life, anxiety, and depression knowledge and skills. Two of the included studies were assessed as being at unclear/high risk of bias - with randomisation and allocation procedures, as well as adverse events and reasons for drop-outs poorly reported. There was no reporting on intervention costs/benefits or how they affected health service utilisation. CONCLUSION: This systematic review found limited evidence for the effectiveness of MBIs in epilepsy, however preliminary evidence suggests it may lead to some improvement in anxiety, depression and quality of life. Further trials with larger sample sizes, active control groups and longer follow-ups are needed before the evidence for MBIs in epilepsy can be conclusively determined. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-017-0832-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5360054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53600542017-03-24 Mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review Wood, Karen Lawrence, Maggie Jani, Bhautesh Simpson, Robert Mercer, Stewart W. BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Mindfulness based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly used to help patients cope with physical and mental long-term conditions (LTCs). Epilepsy is associated with a range of mental and physical comorbidities that have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QOL), but it is not clear whether MBIs can help. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effectiveness of MBIs in people with epilepsy. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, Allied and Complimentary Medicine Database, and PsychInfo were searched in March 2016. These databases were searched using a combination of subject headings where available and keywords in the title and abstracts. We also searched the reference lists of related reviews. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 231 participants were included. The interventions were tested in the USA (n = 171) and China (Hong Kong) (n = 60). Significant improvements were reported in depression symptoms, quality of life, anxiety, and depression knowledge and skills. Two of the included studies were assessed as being at unclear/high risk of bias - with randomisation and allocation procedures, as well as adverse events and reasons for drop-outs poorly reported. There was no reporting on intervention costs/benefits or how they affected health service utilisation. CONCLUSION: This systematic review found limited evidence for the effectiveness of MBIs in epilepsy, however preliminary evidence suggests it may lead to some improvement in anxiety, depression and quality of life. Further trials with larger sample sizes, active control groups and longer follow-ups are needed before the evidence for MBIs in epilepsy can be conclusively determined. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-017-0832-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5360054/ /pubmed/28320349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0832-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wood, Karen Lawrence, Maggie Jani, Bhautesh Simpson, Robert Mercer, Stewart W. Mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review |
title | Mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review |
title_full | Mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review |
title_short | Mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review |
title_sort | mindfulness-based interventions in epilepsy: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28320349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0832-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodkaren mindfulnessbasedinterventionsinepilepsyasystematicreview AT lawrencemaggie mindfulnessbasedinterventionsinepilepsyasystematicreview AT janibhautesh mindfulnessbasedinterventionsinepilepsyasystematicreview AT simpsonrobert mindfulnessbasedinterventionsinepilepsyasystematicreview AT mercerstewartw mindfulnessbasedinterventionsinepilepsyasystematicreview |