Cargando…

Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review

Although the technique of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been a revolution in the alleviation of male infertility, the use of testicular sperm for ICSI was a formerly unseen breakthrough in the treatment of the azoospermic man with primary testicular failure. At the clinical level, diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verheyen, Greta, Popovic-Todorovic, Biljana, Tournaye, Herman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-017-0050-2
_version_ 1782516530597068800
author Verheyen, Greta
Popovic-Todorovic, Biljana
Tournaye, Herman
author_facet Verheyen, Greta
Popovic-Todorovic, Biljana
Tournaye, Herman
author_sort Verheyen, Greta
collection PubMed
description Although the technique of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been a revolution in the alleviation of male infertility, the use of testicular sperm for ICSI was a formerly unseen breakthrough in the treatment of the azoospermic man with primary testicular failure. At the clinical level, different procedures of testicular sperm retrieval (conventional TESE, micro-TESE, FNA/TESA, MESA, PESA) are being performed, the choice is mainly based on the cause of azoospermia (obstructive versus non-obstructive) and the surgeon’s skills. At the level of the IVF laboratory, mechanical procedures to harvest the sperm from the tissue may be combined with enzymatic treatment in order to increase the sperm recovery rates. A number of techniques have been developed for viable sperm selection in males with only immotile testicular sperm available. However, large, well-designed studies on the benefit and safety of one over the other technique are lacking. Despite all the available methods and combinations of laboratory procedures which have a common goal to maximize sperm recovery from testicular samples, a large proportion of NOA patients fail to father a genetically own child. Advanced technology application may improve recovery rates by detection of the testicular foci with active spermatogenesis and/or identification of the rare individual sperm in the testicular suspensions. On the other hand, in vitro spermatogenesis or sperm production from embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells might be future options. The present review summarizes the available strategies which aim to maximize sperm recovery from surgically retrieved samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5360083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53600832017-03-22 Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review Verheyen, Greta Popovic-Todorovic, Biljana Tournaye, Herman Basic Clin Androl Review Article Although the technique of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been a revolution in the alleviation of male infertility, the use of testicular sperm for ICSI was a formerly unseen breakthrough in the treatment of the azoospermic man with primary testicular failure. At the clinical level, different procedures of testicular sperm retrieval (conventional TESE, micro-TESE, FNA/TESA, MESA, PESA) are being performed, the choice is mainly based on the cause of azoospermia (obstructive versus non-obstructive) and the surgeon’s skills. At the level of the IVF laboratory, mechanical procedures to harvest the sperm from the tissue may be combined with enzymatic treatment in order to increase the sperm recovery rates. A number of techniques have been developed for viable sperm selection in males with only immotile testicular sperm available. However, large, well-designed studies on the benefit and safety of one over the other technique are lacking. Despite all the available methods and combinations of laboratory procedures which have a common goal to maximize sperm recovery from testicular samples, a large proportion of NOA patients fail to father a genetically own child. Advanced technology application may improve recovery rates by detection of the testicular foci with active spermatogenesis and/or identification of the rare individual sperm in the testicular suspensions. On the other hand, in vitro spermatogenesis or sperm production from embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells might be future options. The present review summarizes the available strategies which aim to maximize sperm recovery from surgically retrieved samples. BioMed Central 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5360083/ /pubmed/28331619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-017-0050-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review Article
Verheyen, Greta
Popovic-Todorovic, Biljana
Tournaye, Herman
Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review
title Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review
title_full Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review
title_fullStr Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review
title_full_unstemmed Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review
title_short Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review
title_sort processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for icsi: a review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-017-0050-2
work_keys_str_mv AT verheyengreta processingandselectionofsurgicallyretrievedspermforicsiareview
AT popovictodorovicbiljana processingandselectionofsurgicallyretrievedspermforicsiareview
AT tournayeherman processingandselectionofsurgicallyretrievedspermforicsiareview