Cargando…
Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression
KEY MESSAGE: The choice of promoter regulating the selectable marker gene impacts transformation efficiency, copy number and the expression of selectable marker and flanking genes in maize. ABSTRACT: Viral or plant-derived constitutive promoters are often used to regulate selectable marker genes. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28160062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2099-y |
_version_ | 1782516657025974272 |
---|---|
author | Beringer, Jeffrey Chen, Wei Garton, Russell Sardesai, Nagesh Wang, Po-Hao Zhou, Ning Gupta, Manju Wu, Huixia |
author_facet | Beringer, Jeffrey Chen, Wei Garton, Russell Sardesai, Nagesh Wang, Po-Hao Zhou, Ning Gupta, Manju Wu, Huixia |
author_sort | Beringer, Jeffrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | KEY MESSAGE: The choice of promoter regulating the selectable marker gene impacts transformation efficiency, copy number and the expression of selectable marker and flanking genes in maize. ABSTRACT: Viral or plant-derived constitutive promoters are often used to regulate selectable marker genes. We compared two viral promoters, cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV 35T) and sugarcane bacilliform virus (SCBV) with two plant promoters, rice actin1 (OsAct1) and maize ubiquitin 1 (ZmUbi1) to drive aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase (aad-1) selectable marker gene in maize inbred line B104. ZmUbi1- and OsAct1-containing constructs demonstrated higher transformation frequencies (43.8 and 41.4%, respectively) than the two viral promoter constructs, CaMV 35T (25%) and SCBV (8%). Interestingly, a higher percentage of single copy events were recovered for SCBV (82.1%) and CaMV 35T (59.3%) promoter constructs, compared to the two plant-derived promoters, OsAct1 (40.0%), and ZmUbi1 (27.6%). Analysis of protein expression suggested that the viral promoter CaMV 35T expressed significantly higher AAD-1 protein (174.6 ng/cm(2)) than the OsAct1 promoter (12.6 ng/cm(2)) in T(0) leaf tissue. When measured in T(2) callus tissue, the two viral promoters both had higher expression and more variability than the two plant-derived promoters. A potential explanation for why viral promoters produce lower transformation efficiencies but higher percentages of low copy number events is discussed. In addition, viral promoters regulating aad-1 were found to influence the expression of upstream flanking genes in both T(0) leaf and T(2) callus tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5360835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53608352017-04-04 Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression Beringer, Jeffrey Chen, Wei Garton, Russell Sardesai, Nagesh Wang, Po-Hao Zhou, Ning Gupta, Manju Wu, Huixia Plant Cell Rep Original Article KEY MESSAGE: The choice of promoter regulating the selectable marker gene impacts transformation efficiency, copy number and the expression of selectable marker and flanking genes in maize. ABSTRACT: Viral or plant-derived constitutive promoters are often used to regulate selectable marker genes. We compared two viral promoters, cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV 35T) and sugarcane bacilliform virus (SCBV) with two plant promoters, rice actin1 (OsAct1) and maize ubiquitin 1 (ZmUbi1) to drive aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase (aad-1) selectable marker gene in maize inbred line B104. ZmUbi1- and OsAct1-containing constructs demonstrated higher transformation frequencies (43.8 and 41.4%, respectively) than the two viral promoter constructs, CaMV 35T (25%) and SCBV (8%). Interestingly, a higher percentage of single copy events were recovered for SCBV (82.1%) and CaMV 35T (59.3%) promoter constructs, compared to the two plant-derived promoters, OsAct1 (40.0%), and ZmUbi1 (27.6%). Analysis of protein expression suggested that the viral promoter CaMV 35T expressed significantly higher AAD-1 protein (174.6 ng/cm(2)) than the OsAct1 promoter (12.6 ng/cm(2)) in T(0) leaf tissue. When measured in T(2) callus tissue, the two viral promoters both had higher expression and more variability than the two plant-derived promoters. A potential explanation for why viral promoters produce lower transformation efficiencies but higher percentages of low copy number events is discussed. In addition, viral promoters regulating aad-1 were found to influence the expression of upstream flanking genes in both T(0) leaf and T(2) callus tissue. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-02-03 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5360835/ /pubmed/28160062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2099-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Beringer, Jeffrey Chen, Wei Garton, Russell Sardesai, Nagesh Wang, Po-Hao Zhou, Ning Gupta, Manju Wu, Huixia Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression |
title | Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression |
title_full | Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression |
title_short | Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression |
title_sort | comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28160062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2099-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beringerjeffrey comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression AT chenwei comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression AT gartonrussell comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression AT sardesainagesh comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression AT wangpohao comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression AT zhouning comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression AT guptamanju comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression AT wuhuixia comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression |