Cargando…

Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression

KEY MESSAGE: The choice of promoter regulating the selectable marker gene impacts transformation efficiency, copy number and the expression of selectable marker and flanking genes in maize. ABSTRACT: Viral or plant-derived constitutive promoters are often used to regulate selectable marker genes. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beringer, Jeffrey, Chen, Wei, Garton, Russell, Sardesai, Nagesh, Wang, Po-Hao, Zhou, Ning, Gupta, Manju, Wu, Huixia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28160062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2099-y
_version_ 1782516657025974272
author Beringer, Jeffrey
Chen, Wei
Garton, Russell
Sardesai, Nagesh
Wang, Po-Hao
Zhou, Ning
Gupta, Manju
Wu, Huixia
author_facet Beringer, Jeffrey
Chen, Wei
Garton, Russell
Sardesai, Nagesh
Wang, Po-Hao
Zhou, Ning
Gupta, Manju
Wu, Huixia
author_sort Beringer, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description KEY MESSAGE: The choice of promoter regulating the selectable marker gene impacts transformation efficiency, copy number and the expression of selectable marker and flanking genes in maize. ABSTRACT: Viral or plant-derived constitutive promoters are often used to regulate selectable marker genes. We compared two viral promoters, cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV 35T) and sugarcane bacilliform virus (SCBV) with two plant promoters, rice actin1 (OsAct1) and maize ubiquitin 1 (ZmUbi1) to drive aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase (aad-1) selectable marker gene in maize inbred line B104. ZmUbi1- and OsAct1-containing constructs demonstrated higher transformation frequencies (43.8 and 41.4%, respectively) than the two viral promoter constructs, CaMV 35T (25%) and SCBV (8%). Interestingly, a higher percentage of single copy events were recovered for SCBV (82.1%) and CaMV 35T (59.3%) promoter constructs, compared to the two plant-derived promoters, OsAct1 (40.0%), and ZmUbi1 (27.6%). Analysis of protein expression suggested that the viral promoter CaMV 35T expressed significantly higher AAD-1 protein (174.6 ng/cm(2)) than the OsAct1 promoter (12.6 ng/cm(2)) in T(0) leaf tissue. When measured in T(2) callus tissue, the two viral promoters both had higher expression and more variability than the two plant-derived promoters. A potential explanation for why viral promoters produce lower transformation efficiencies but higher percentages of low copy number events is discussed. In addition, viral promoters regulating aad-1 were found to influence the expression of upstream flanking genes in both T(0) leaf and T(2) callus tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5360835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53608352017-04-04 Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression Beringer, Jeffrey Chen, Wei Garton, Russell Sardesai, Nagesh Wang, Po-Hao Zhou, Ning Gupta, Manju Wu, Huixia Plant Cell Rep Original Article KEY MESSAGE: The choice of promoter regulating the selectable marker gene impacts transformation efficiency, copy number and the expression of selectable marker and flanking genes in maize. ABSTRACT: Viral or plant-derived constitutive promoters are often used to regulate selectable marker genes. We compared two viral promoters, cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV 35T) and sugarcane bacilliform virus (SCBV) with two plant promoters, rice actin1 (OsAct1) and maize ubiquitin 1 (ZmUbi1) to drive aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase (aad-1) selectable marker gene in maize inbred line B104. ZmUbi1- and OsAct1-containing constructs demonstrated higher transformation frequencies (43.8 and 41.4%, respectively) than the two viral promoter constructs, CaMV 35T (25%) and SCBV (8%). Interestingly, a higher percentage of single copy events were recovered for SCBV (82.1%) and CaMV 35T (59.3%) promoter constructs, compared to the two plant-derived promoters, OsAct1 (40.0%), and ZmUbi1 (27.6%). Analysis of protein expression suggested that the viral promoter CaMV 35T expressed significantly higher AAD-1 protein (174.6 ng/cm(2)) than the OsAct1 promoter (12.6 ng/cm(2)) in T(0) leaf tissue. When measured in T(2) callus tissue, the two viral promoters both had higher expression and more variability than the two plant-derived promoters. A potential explanation for why viral promoters produce lower transformation efficiencies but higher percentages of low copy number events is discussed. In addition, viral promoters regulating aad-1 were found to influence the expression of upstream flanking genes in both T(0) leaf and T(2) callus tissue. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-02-03 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5360835/ /pubmed/28160062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2099-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Beringer, Jeffrey
Chen, Wei
Garton, Russell
Sardesai, Nagesh
Wang, Po-Hao
Zhou, Ning
Gupta, Manju
Wu, Huixia
Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression
title Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression
title_full Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression
title_fullStr Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression
title_short Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression
title_sort comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28160062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2099-y
work_keys_str_mv AT beringerjeffrey comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression
AT chenwei comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression
AT gartonrussell comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression
AT sardesainagesh comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression
AT wangpohao comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression
AT zhouning comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression
AT guptamanju comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression
AT wuhuixia comparisonoftheimpactofviralandplantderivedpromotersregulatingselectablemarkergeneonmaizetransformationandtransgeneexpression