Cargando…
Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue
[Purpose] Continuous electrical stimulation of abdominal wall muscles is known to induce mild muscle fatigue. However, it is not clear whether this is also true for functional electrical stimulation delivered only during the expiratory phase of breathing. This study aimed to examine whether or not i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.484 |
_version_ | 1782516686669217792 |
---|---|
author | Okuno, Yukako Takahashi, Ryoichi Sewa, Yoko Ohse, Hirotaka Imura, Shigeyuki Tomita, Kazuhide |
author_facet | Okuno, Yukako Takahashi, Ryoichi Sewa, Yoko Ohse, Hirotaka Imura, Shigeyuki Tomita, Kazuhide |
author_sort | Okuno, Yukako |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] Continuous electrical stimulation of abdominal wall muscles is known to induce mild muscle fatigue. However, it is not clear whether this is also true for functional electrical stimulation delivered only during the expiratory phase of breathing. This study aimed to examine whether or not intermittent electrical stimulation delivered to abdominal wall muscles induces muscle fatigue. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were nine healthy adults. Abdominal electrical stimulation was applied for 1.5 seconds from the start of expiration and then turned off during inspiration. The electrodes were attached to both sides of the abdomen at the lower margin of the 12th rib. Abdominal electrical stimulation was delivered for 15 minutes with the subject in a seated position. Expiratory flow was measured during stimulus. Trunk flexor torque and electromyography activity were measured to evaluate abdominal muscle fatigue. [Results] The mean stimulation on/off ratio was 1:2.3. The declining rate of abdominal muscle torque was 61.1 ± 19.1% before stimulus and 56.5 ± 20.9% after stimulus, not significantly different. The declining rate of mean power frequency was 47.8 ± 11.7% before stimulus and 47.9 ± 10.2% after stimulus, not significantly different. [Conclusion] It was found that intermittent electrical stimulation to abdominal muscles synchronized with the expiratory would not induce muscle fatigue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5361015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53610152017-03-29 Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue Okuno, Yukako Takahashi, Ryoichi Sewa, Yoko Ohse, Hirotaka Imura, Shigeyuki Tomita, Kazuhide J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Continuous electrical stimulation of abdominal wall muscles is known to induce mild muscle fatigue. However, it is not clear whether this is also true for functional electrical stimulation delivered only during the expiratory phase of breathing. This study aimed to examine whether or not intermittent electrical stimulation delivered to abdominal wall muscles induces muscle fatigue. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were nine healthy adults. Abdominal electrical stimulation was applied for 1.5 seconds from the start of expiration and then turned off during inspiration. The electrodes were attached to both sides of the abdomen at the lower margin of the 12th rib. Abdominal electrical stimulation was delivered for 15 minutes with the subject in a seated position. Expiratory flow was measured during stimulus. Trunk flexor torque and electromyography activity were measured to evaluate abdominal muscle fatigue. [Results] The mean stimulation on/off ratio was 1:2.3. The declining rate of abdominal muscle torque was 61.1 ± 19.1% before stimulus and 56.5 ± 20.9% after stimulus, not significantly different. The declining rate of mean power frequency was 47.8 ± 11.7% before stimulus and 47.9 ± 10.2% after stimulus, not significantly different. [Conclusion] It was found that intermittent electrical stimulation to abdominal muscles synchronized with the expiratory would not induce muscle fatigue. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017-03-22 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5361015/ /pubmed/28356636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.484 Text en 2017©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Okuno, Yukako Takahashi, Ryoichi Sewa, Yoko Ohse, Hirotaka Imura, Shigeyuki Tomita, Kazuhide Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue |
title | Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized
with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue |
title_full | Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized
with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue |
title_fullStr | Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized
with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized
with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue |
title_short | Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized
with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue |
title_sort | functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized
with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okunoyukako functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue AT takahashiryoichi functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue AT sewayoko functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue AT ohsehirotaka functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue AT imurashigeyuki functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue AT tomitakazuhide functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue |