Cargando…

Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue

[Purpose] Continuous electrical stimulation of abdominal wall muscles is known to induce mild muscle fatigue. However, it is not clear whether this is also true for functional electrical stimulation delivered only during the expiratory phase of breathing. This study aimed to examine whether or not i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okuno, Yukako, Takahashi, Ryoichi, Sewa, Yoko, Ohse, Hirotaka, Imura, Shigeyuki, Tomita, Kazuhide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.484
_version_ 1782516686669217792
author Okuno, Yukako
Takahashi, Ryoichi
Sewa, Yoko
Ohse, Hirotaka
Imura, Shigeyuki
Tomita, Kazuhide
author_facet Okuno, Yukako
Takahashi, Ryoichi
Sewa, Yoko
Ohse, Hirotaka
Imura, Shigeyuki
Tomita, Kazuhide
author_sort Okuno, Yukako
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] Continuous electrical stimulation of abdominal wall muscles is known to induce mild muscle fatigue. However, it is not clear whether this is also true for functional electrical stimulation delivered only during the expiratory phase of breathing. This study aimed to examine whether or not intermittent electrical stimulation delivered to abdominal wall muscles induces muscle fatigue. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were nine healthy adults. Abdominal electrical stimulation was applied for 1.5 seconds from the start of expiration and then turned off during inspiration. The electrodes were attached to both sides of the abdomen at the lower margin of the 12th rib. Abdominal electrical stimulation was delivered for 15 minutes with the subject in a seated position. Expiratory flow was measured during stimulus. Trunk flexor torque and electromyography activity were measured to evaluate abdominal muscle fatigue. [Results] The mean stimulation on/off ratio was 1:2.3. The declining rate of abdominal muscle torque was 61.1 ± 19.1% before stimulus and 56.5 ± 20.9% after stimulus, not significantly different. The declining rate of mean power frequency was 47.8 ± 11.7% before stimulus and 47.9 ± 10.2% after stimulus, not significantly different. [Conclusion] It was found that intermittent electrical stimulation to abdominal muscles synchronized with the expiratory would not induce muscle fatigue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5361015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53610152017-03-29 Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue Okuno, Yukako Takahashi, Ryoichi Sewa, Yoko Ohse, Hirotaka Imura, Shigeyuki Tomita, Kazuhide J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Continuous electrical stimulation of abdominal wall muscles is known to induce mild muscle fatigue. However, it is not clear whether this is also true for functional electrical stimulation delivered only during the expiratory phase of breathing. This study aimed to examine whether or not intermittent electrical stimulation delivered to abdominal wall muscles induces muscle fatigue. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were nine healthy adults. Abdominal electrical stimulation was applied for 1.5 seconds from the start of expiration and then turned off during inspiration. The electrodes were attached to both sides of the abdomen at the lower margin of the 12th rib. Abdominal electrical stimulation was delivered for 15 minutes with the subject in a seated position. Expiratory flow was measured during stimulus. Trunk flexor torque and electromyography activity were measured to evaluate abdominal muscle fatigue. [Results] The mean stimulation on/off ratio was 1:2.3. The declining rate of abdominal muscle torque was 61.1 ± 19.1% before stimulus and 56.5 ± 20.9% after stimulus, not significantly different. The declining rate of mean power frequency was 47.8 ± 11.7% before stimulus and 47.9 ± 10.2% after stimulus, not significantly different. [Conclusion] It was found that intermittent electrical stimulation to abdominal muscles synchronized with the expiratory would not induce muscle fatigue. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017-03-22 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5361015/ /pubmed/28356636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.484 Text en 2017©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Okuno, Yukako
Takahashi, Ryoichi
Sewa, Yoko
Ohse, Hirotaka
Imura, Shigeyuki
Tomita, Kazuhide
Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue
title Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue
title_full Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue
title_fullStr Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue
title_full_unstemmed Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue
title_short Functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue
title_sort functional electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall muscles synchronized with the expiratory flow does not induce muscle fatigue
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.484
work_keys_str_mv AT okunoyukako functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue
AT takahashiryoichi functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue
AT sewayoko functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue
AT ohsehirotaka functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue
AT imurashigeyuki functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue
AT tomitakazuhide functionalelectricalstimulationtotheabdominalwallmusclessynchronizedwiththeexpiratoryflowdoesnotinducemusclefatigue