Cargando…

Limited incision carpal tunnel release

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy. Limited incision techniques for carpal tunnel release are gaining popularity. The main advantages of these techniques are less scar load, less pillar pain, shorter recovery, and return-to-work time. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaba, Sunil, Bhogesha, Sandeep, Singh, Onkar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400666
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.201700
_version_ 1782516782459781120
author Gaba, Sunil
Bhogesha, Sandeep
Singh, Onkar
author_facet Gaba, Sunil
Bhogesha, Sandeep
Singh, Onkar
author_sort Gaba, Sunil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy. Limited incision techniques for carpal tunnel release are gaining popularity. The main advantages of these techniques are less scar load, less pillar pain, shorter recovery, and return-to-work time. However, the completeness of release, and risk of neurovascular injury are always a concern. We devised a method of limited incision release with two mini-incisions and use of nasal speculum and a probe. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and neurological outcome of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty seven cases (9 male and 18 female, age 28–56 years) of isolated CTS cases were enrolled in the study. A total of 33 hands (six bilateral) underwent limited incision carpal tunnel release. In this study, two mini-incisions were used and release was done with the help of nasal speculum. Evaluation preoperatively and in 6 months and at 1-year postoperatively was done, namely, (a) clinical status examination, (b) motor testing using grip and pinch dynamometer, and (c) neurological outcome measure using nerve conduction study. RESULTS: All the patients had good clinical and neurological outcome with no recurrence during followup. The first symptom to get relieved was night pains, with a mean of 4.5 days (range 2–14 days). Compared to pain, improvement of sensory symptoms was delayed; the mean duration was 42.8 days (range 30–90 days). Scar tenderness was present only for a mean duration of 9 days (range 7–21 days). The mean duration for patients to resume their daily activities was12 days (range 7–28 days) and to work was 32 days (range 21–90 days). The hand grip showed mean values of 45.12 ± 16.16 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 62.45 ± 18.86 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 74.87 ± 20.35 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The key pinch showed mean values of 11.27 ± 3.51 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 20.181 ± 3.94 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 27.96 ± 94.42 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The tip pinch showed mean values of 8.88 ± 2.39 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 15.393 ± 3.25 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 19.27 ± 4.81 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The palmar pinch showed mean values of 14.42 ± 2.92 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 19.303 ± 3.62 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 22.97 ± 4.08 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Limited incision carpal tunnel release can be considered a feasible alternative to traditional open release and endoscopic release.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5361471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53614712017-04-11 Limited incision carpal tunnel release Gaba, Sunil Bhogesha, Sandeep Singh, Onkar Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy. Limited incision techniques for carpal tunnel release are gaining popularity. The main advantages of these techniques are less scar load, less pillar pain, shorter recovery, and return-to-work time. However, the completeness of release, and risk of neurovascular injury are always a concern. We devised a method of limited incision release with two mini-incisions and use of nasal speculum and a probe. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and neurological outcome of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty seven cases (9 male and 18 female, age 28–56 years) of isolated CTS cases were enrolled in the study. A total of 33 hands (six bilateral) underwent limited incision carpal tunnel release. In this study, two mini-incisions were used and release was done with the help of nasal speculum. Evaluation preoperatively and in 6 months and at 1-year postoperatively was done, namely, (a) clinical status examination, (b) motor testing using grip and pinch dynamometer, and (c) neurological outcome measure using nerve conduction study. RESULTS: All the patients had good clinical and neurological outcome with no recurrence during followup. The first symptom to get relieved was night pains, with a mean of 4.5 days (range 2–14 days). Compared to pain, improvement of sensory symptoms was delayed; the mean duration was 42.8 days (range 30–90 days). Scar tenderness was present only for a mean duration of 9 days (range 7–21 days). The mean duration for patients to resume their daily activities was12 days (range 7–28 days) and to work was 32 days (range 21–90 days). The hand grip showed mean values of 45.12 ± 16.16 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 62.45 ± 18.86 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 74.87 ± 20.35 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The key pinch showed mean values of 11.27 ± 3.51 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 20.181 ± 3.94 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 27.96 ± 94.42 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The tip pinch showed mean values of 8.88 ± 2.39 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 15.393 ± 3.25 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 19.27 ± 4.81 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. The palmar pinch showed mean values of 14.42 ± 2.92 g/mm(2) preoperatively, 19.303 ± 3.62 g/mm(2) at 6 months postoperatively, and 22.97 ± 4.08 g/mm(2) at 1-year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Limited incision carpal tunnel release can be considered a feasible alternative to traditional open release and endoscopic release. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5361471/ /pubmed/28400666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.201700 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gaba, Sunil
Bhogesha, Sandeep
Singh, Onkar
Limited incision carpal tunnel release
title Limited incision carpal tunnel release
title_full Limited incision carpal tunnel release
title_fullStr Limited incision carpal tunnel release
title_full_unstemmed Limited incision carpal tunnel release
title_short Limited incision carpal tunnel release
title_sort limited incision carpal tunnel release
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400666
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.201700
work_keys_str_mv AT gabasunil limitedincisioncarpaltunnelrelease
AT bhogeshasandeep limitedincisioncarpaltunnelrelease
AT singhonkar limitedincisioncarpaltunnelrelease