Cargando…

International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries

BACKGROUND: In recognition of the need for long-term planning for global health research, and to inform future global health research priorities, the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID) carried out a public consultation between May and June 2015. The consultation aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conalogue, David Mc, Kinn, Sue, Mulligan, Jo-Ann, McNeil, Malcolm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28327164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0181-0
_version_ 1782516845659553792
author Conalogue, David Mc
Kinn, Sue
Mulligan, Jo-Ann
McNeil, Malcolm
author_facet Conalogue, David Mc
Kinn, Sue
Mulligan, Jo-Ann
McNeil, Malcolm
author_sort Conalogue, David Mc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recognition of the need for long-term planning for global health research, and to inform future global health research priorities, the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID) carried out a public consultation between May and June 2015. The consultation aimed to elicit views on the (1) the long-term future global health research priorities; (2) areas likely to be less important over time; (3) how to improve research uptake in low-income countries; and (4) how to build research capacity in low-income countries. METHODS: An online consultation was used to survey a wide range of participants on global health research priorities. The qualitative data was analysed using a thematic analysis, with frequency of codes in responses tabulated to approximate relative importance of themes and sub-themes. RESULTS: The public consultation yielded 421 responses. The survey responses confirmed the growing importance of non-communicable disease as a global health research priority, being placed above infectious diseases. Participants felt that the key area for reducing funding prioritisation was infectious diseases. The involvement of policymakers and other key stakeholders was seen as critical to drive research uptake, as was collaboration and partnership. Several methods to build research capacity in low-income countries were described, including capacity building educational programmes, mentorship programmes and research institution collaboration and partnership. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes from this consultation survey provide valuable insights into how DfID stakeholders prioritise research. The outcomes from this survey were reviewed alongside other elements of a wider DfID consultation process to help inform long-term research prioritisation of global health research. There are limitations in this approach; the opportunistic nature of the survey’s dissemination means the findings presented may not be representative of the full range of stakeholders or views.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5361834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53618342017-03-24 International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries Conalogue, David Mc Kinn, Sue Mulligan, Jo-Ann McNeil, Malcolm Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: In recognition of the need for long-term planning for global health research, and to inform future global health research priorities, the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID) carried out a public consultation between May and June 2015. The consultation aimed to elicit views on the (1) the long-term future global health research priorities; (2) areas likely to be less important over time; (3) how to improve research uptake in low-income countries; and (4) how to build research capacity in low-income countries. METHODS: An online consultation was used to survey a wide range of participants on global health research priorities. The qualitative data was analysed using a thematic analysis, with frequency of codes in responses tabulated to approximate relative importance of themes and sub-themes. RESULTS: The public consultation yielded 421 responses. The survey responses confirmed the growing importance of non-communicable disease as a global health research priority, being placed above infectious diseases. Participants felt that the key area for reducing funding prioritisation was infectious diseases. The involvement of policymakers and other key stakeholders was seen as critical to drive research uptake, as was collaboration and partnership. Several methods to build research capacity in low-income countries were described, including capacity building educational programmes, mentorship programmes and research institution collaboration and partnership. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes from this consultation survey provide valuable insights into how DfID stakeholders prioritise research. The outcomes from this survey were reviewed alongside other elements of a wider DfID consultation process to help inform long-term research prioritisation of global health research. There are limitations in this approach; the opportunistic nature of the survey’s dissemination means the findings presented may not be representative of the full range of stakeholders or views. BioMed Central 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5361834/ /pubmed/28327164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0181-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Conalogue, David Mc
Kinn, Sue
Mulligan, Jo-Ann
McNeil, Malcolm
International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries
title International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries
title_full International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries
title_fullStr International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries
title_full_unstemmed International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries
title_short International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries
title_sort international consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28327164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0181-0
work_keys_str_mv AT conaloguedavidmc internationalconsultationonlongtermglobalhealthresearchprioritiesresearchcapacityandresearchuptakeindevelopingcountries
AT kinnsue internationalconsultationonlongtermglobalhealthresearchprioritiesresearchcapacityandresearchuptakeindevelopingcountries
AT mulliganjoann internationalconsultationonlongtermglobalhealthresearchprioritiesresearchcapacityandresearchuptakeindevelopingcountries
AT mcneilmalcolm internationalconsultationonlongtermglobalhealthresearchprioritiesresearchcapacityandresearchuptakeindevelopingcountries