Cargando…
Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type
Background and study aims The pocket-creation method (PCM) is a novel strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of the PCM for colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type (LST-NG). Patients and methods The records of 126 cons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-122778 |
_version_ | 1782516856014241792 |
---|---|
author | Sakamoto, Hirotsugu Hayashi, Yoshikazu Miura, Yoshimasa Shinozaki, Satoshi Takahashi, Haruo Fukuda, Hisashi Okada, Masahiro Ino, Yuji Takezawa, Takahito Sunada, Keijiro Lefor, Alan Kawarai Yamamoto, Hironori |
author_facet | Sakamoto, Hirotsugu Hayashi, Yoshikazu Miura, Yoshimasa Shinozaki, Satoshi Takahashi, Haruo Fukuda, Hisashi Okada, Masahiro Ino, Yuji Takezawa, Takahito Sunada, Keijiro Lefor, Alan Kawarai Yamamoto, Hironori |
author_sort | Sakamoto, Hirotsugu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims The pocket-creation method (PCM) is a novel strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of the PCM for colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type (LST-NG). Patients and methods The records of 126 consecutive patients with colorectal LST-NG who underwent ESD between April 2012 and July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into PCM (n = 73) and conventional method (CM) (n = 53) groups. Results The en bloc resection rate in the PCM group was significantly higher than in the CM group (100 % [73/73] vs. 92 % [49/53], P = 0.03). The en bloc resection rate with severe fibrosis was higher in the PCM group than in the CM group (100 % [3/3] vs. 60 % [3/5]). The R0 resection rate for the two groups was not statistically significantly different (93 % [68/73] vs. 91 % [48/53], P = 0.74). The perforation rate in the PCM group was lower than in the CM group although not statistically significantly less (0 % 0/73 vs. 4 % 2/53, P = 0.18). For lesions resected en bloc, dissection speed for the PCM group was significantly faster than for the CM group (median [IQR], 19 [13 –24] vs. 14 [10 – 22] mm(2)/min, P = 0.03). Conclusion ESD using PCM achieves a reliable and safe resection of colorectal LST-NG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5361878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53618782017-03-23 Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type Sakamoto, Hirotsugu Hayashi, Yoshikazu Miura, Yoshimasa Shinozaki, Satoshi Takahashi, Haruo Fukuda, Hisashi Okada, Masahiro Ino, Yuji Takezawa, Takahito Sunada, Keijiro Lefor, Alan Kawarai Yamamoto, Hironori Endosc Int Open Background and study aims The pocket-creation method (PCM) is a novel strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of the PCM for colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type (LST-NG). Patients and methods The records of 126 consecutive patients with colorectal LST-NG who underwent ESD between April 2012 and July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into PCM (n = 73) and conventional method (CM) (n = 53) groups. Results The en bloc resection rate in the PCM group was significantly higher than in the CM group (100 % [73/73] vs. 92 % [49/53], P = 0.03). The en bloc resection rate with severe fibrosis was higher in the PCM group than in the CM group (100 % [3/3] vs. 60 % [3/5]). The R0 resection rate for the two groups was not statistically significantly different (93 % [68/73] vs. 91 % [48/53], P = 0.74). The perforation rate in the PCM group was lower than in the CM group although not statistically significantly less (0 % 0/73 vs. 4 % 2/53, P = 0.18). For lesions resected en bloc, dissection speed for the PCM group was significantly faster than for the CM group (median [IQR], 19 [13 –24] vs. 14 [10 – 22] mm(2)/min, P = 0.03). Conclusion ESD using PCM achieves a reliable and safe resection of colorectal LST-NG. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5361878/ /pubmed/28337483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-122778 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Sakamoto, Hirotsugu Hayashi, Yoshikazu Miura, Yoshimasa Shinozaki, Satoshi Takahashi, Haruo Fukuda, Hisashi Okada, Masahiro Ino, Yuji Takezawa, Takahito Sunada, Keijiro Lefor, Alan Kawarai Yamamoto, Hironori Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type |
title | Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type |
title_full | Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type |
title_fullStr | Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type |
title_full_unstemmed | Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type |
title_short | Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type |
title_sort | pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-122778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakamotohirotsugu pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT hayashiyoshikazu pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT miurayoshimasa pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT shinozakisatoshi pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT takahashiharuo pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT fukudahisashi pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT okadamasahiro pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT inoyuji pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT takezawatakahito pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT sunadakeijiro pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT leforalankawarai pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype AT yamamotohironori pocketcreationmethodfacilitatesendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofcolorectallaterallyspreadingtumorsnongranulartype |