Cargando…

Adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling

To cope with computing power limitations, air quality models that are used in integrated assessment applications are generally approximated by simpler expressions referred to as “source-receptor relationships (SRR)”. In addition to speed, it is desirable for the SRR also to be spatially flexible (ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pisoni, E., Clappier, A., Degraeuwe, B., Thunis, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5362155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28373812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.001
_version_ 1782516910394441728
author Pisoni, E.
Clappier, A.
Degraeuwe, B.
Thunis, P.
author_facet Pisoni, E.
Clappier, A.
Degraeuwe, B.
Thunis, P.
author_sort Pisoni, E.
collection PubMed
description To cope with computing power limitations, air quality models that are used in integrated assessment applications are generally approximated by simpler expressions referred to as “source-receptor relationships (SRR)”. In addition to speed, it is desirable for the SRR also to be spatially flexible (application over a wide range of situations) and to require a “light setup” (based on a limited number of full Air Quality Models - AQM simulations). But “speed”, “flexibility” and “light setup” do not naturally come together and a good compromise must be ensured that preserves “accuracy”, i.e. a good comparability between SRR results and AQM. In this work we further develop a SRR methodology to better capture spatial flexibility. The updated methodology is based on a cell-to-cell relationship, in which a bell-shape function links emissions to concentrations. Maintaining a cell-to-cell relationship is shown to be the key element needed to ensure spatial flexibility, while at the same time the proposed approach to link emissions and concentrations guarantees a “light set-up” phase. Validation has been repeated on different areas and domain sizes (countries, regions, province throughout Europe) for precursors reduced independently or contemporarily. All runs showed a bias around 10% between the full AQM and the SRR. This methodology allows assessing the impact on air quality of emission scenarios applied over any given area in Europe (regions, set of regions, countries), provided that a limited number of AQM simulations are performed for training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5362155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53621552017-04-01 Adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling Pisoni, E. Clappier, A. Degraeuwe, B. Thunis, P. Environ Model Softw Article To cope with computing power limitations, air quality models that are used in integrated assessment applications are generally approximated by simpler expressions referred to as “source-receptor relationships (SRR)”. In addition to speed, it is desirable for the SRR also to be spatially flexible (application over a wide range of situations) and to require a “light setup” (based on a limited number of full Air Quality Models - AQM simulations). But “speed”, “flexibility” and “light setup” do not naturally come together and a good compromise must be ensured that preserves “accuracy”, i.e. a good comparability between SRR results and AQM. In this work we further develop a SRR methodology to better capture spatial flexibility. The updated methodology is based on a cell-to-cell relationship, in which a bell-shape function links emissions to concentrations. Maintaining a cell-to-cell relationship is shown to be the key element needed to ensure spatial flexibility, while at the same time the proposed approach to link emissions and concentrations guarantees a “light set-up” phase. Validation has been repeated on different areas and domain sizes (countries, regions, province throughout Europe) for precursors reduced independently or contemporarily. All runs showed a bias around 10% between the full AQM and the SRR. This methodology allows assessing the impact on air quality of emission scenarios applied over any given area in Europe (regions, set of regions, countries), provided that a limited number of AQM simulations are performed for training. Elsevier Science 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5362155/ /pubmed/28373812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.001 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pisoni, E.
Clappier, A.
Degraeuwe, B.
Thunis, P.
Adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling
title Adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling
title_full Adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling
title_fullStr Adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling
title_full_unstemmed Adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling
title_short Adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling
title_sort adding spatial flexibility to source-receptor relationships for air quality modeling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5362155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28373812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT pisonie addingspatialflexibilitytosourcereceptorrelationshipsforairqualitymodeling
AT clappiera addingspatialflexibilitytosourcereceptorrelationshipsforairqualitymodeling
AT degraeuweb addingspatialflexibilitytosourcereceptorrelationshipsforairqualitymodeling
AT thunisp addingspatialflexibilitytosourcereceptorrelationshipsforairqualitymodeling