Cargando…

Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma

To compare survival outcomes between patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC). Fifty-five patients with well-differentiated newly diagnosed GSCC were pair-matched to 55 patients with poorly differentiated GSCC according to age, sex, year o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ping, Yu, Wenbin, Huang, Junwei, Xu, Hongbo, Li, Guojun, Chen, Xiaohong, Huang, Zhigang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5362442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122353
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14772
_version_ 1782516950346235904
author Chen, Ping
Yu, Wenbin
Huang, Junwei
Xu, Hongbo
Li, Guojun
Chen, Xiaohong
Huang, Zhigang
author_facet Chen, Ping
Yu, Wenbin
Huang, Junwei
Xu, Hongbo
Li, Guojun
Chen, Xiaohong
Huang, Zhigang
author_sort Chen, Ping
collection PubMed
description To compare survival outcomes between patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC). Fifty-five patients with well-differentiated newly diagnosed GSCC were pair-matched to 55 patients with poorly differentiated GSCC according to age, sex, year of diagnosis, overall stage, treatment (surgery type, neck dissection, surgical margin, and chemoradiation), smoking, and alcohol use. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and matched-pair survival was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Patients with well-differentiated GSCC had significantly better overall survival (OS) (P = 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS) (P < 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.003) than patients with poorly differentiated GSCC. Moreover, matched-pair analysis indicated that increased differentiation was associated with a significantly reduced risk of overall death (HR, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07–0.46), death owing to disease (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05–0.45), and disease recurrence (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07–0.41), and these risks were reduced approximately 4-fold, 3.7-fold, and 9-fold, respectively, after adjustment for cancer-associated variables. Survival differed significantly between the well-differentiated and poorly differentiated GSCC patients after adjustment for cancer prognosis-associated variables. Thus, identifying potential differences in the molecular characteristics between these two groups of patients would help to further stratify these patients and ensure appropriate individualized treatment decisions. Basing treatment strategies on the level of differentiation may improve survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5362442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53624422017-04-24 Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma Chen, Ping Yu, Wenbin Huang, Junwei Xu, Hongbo Li, Guojun Chen, Xiaohong Huang, Zhigang Oncotarget Research Paper To compare survival outcomes between patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC). Fifty-five patients with well-differentiated newly diagnosed GSCC were pair-matched to 55 patients with poorly differentiated GSCC according to age, sex, year of diagnosis, overall stage, treatment (surgery type, neck dissection, surgical margin, and chemoradiation), smoking, and alcohol use. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and matched-pair survival was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Patients with well-differentiated GSCC had significantly better overall survival (OS) (P = 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS) (P < 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.003) than patients with poorly differentiated GSCC. Moreover, matched-pair analysis indicated that increased differentiation was associated with a significantly reduced risk of overall death (HR, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07–0.46), death owing to disease (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05–0.45), and disease recurrence (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07–0.41), and these risks were reduced approximately 4-fold, 3.7-fold, and 9-fold, respectively, after adjustment for cancer-associated variables. Survival differed significantly between the well-differentiated and poorly differentiated GSCC patients after adjustment for cancer prognosis-associated variables. Thus, identifying potential differences in the molecular characteristics between these two groups of patients would help to further stratify these patients and ensure appropriate individualized treatment decisions. Basing treatment strategies on the level of differentiation may improve survival. Impact Journals LLC 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5362442/ /pubmed/28122353 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14772 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Chen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Chen, Ping
Yu, Wenbin
Huang, Junwei
Xu, Hongbo
Li, Guojun
Chen, Xiaohong
Huang, Zhigang
Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma
title Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5362442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122353
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14772
work_keys_str_mv AT chenping matchedpairanalysisofsurvivalinpatientswithpoorlydifferentiatedversuswelldifferentiatedglotticsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT yuwenbin matchedpairanalysisofsurvivalinpatientswithpoorlydifferentiatedversuswelldifferentiatedglotticsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT huangjunwei matchedpairanalysisofsurvivalinpatientswithpoorlydifferentiatedversuswelldifferentiatedglotticsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT xuhongbo matchedpairanalysisofsurvivalinpatientswithpoorlydifferentiatedversuswelldifferentiatedglotticsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT liguojun matchedpairanalysisofsurvivalinpatientswithpoorlydifferentiatedversuswelldifferentiatedglotticsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT chenxiaohong matchedpairanalysisofsurvivalinpatientswithpoorlydifferentiatedversuswelldifferentiatedglotticsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT huangzhigang matchedpairanalysisofsurvivalinpatientswithpoorlydifferentiatedversuswelldifferentiatedglotticsquamouscellcarcinoma