Cargando…
Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis
Although peritoneal cytology has been used to determine pancreatic cancer staging for more than three decades, its prognostic significance in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer is inconclusive. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the impact of peritoneal cytology status on...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5362462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122342 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14745 |
_version_ | 1782516955067973632 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Feng Li, Jia Li, Ang Li, Fei |
author_facet | Cao, Feng Li, Jia Li, Ang Li, Fei |
author_sort | Cao, Feng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although peritoneal cytology has been used to determine pancreatic cancer staging for more than three decades, its prognostic significance in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer is inconclusive. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the impact of peritoneal cytology status on the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Ten studies were identified for this meta-analysis after searching the PubMed, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic databases. Our results showed that positive peritoneal cytology was associated with tumor size (OR 11.65, P = 0.001), tumor location (OR 0.37, P = 0.000), serosal invasion (OR 3.89, P = 0.000), portal vein invasion (OR 1.82, P = 0.016), lymph vessel invasion (OR 2.71, P = 0.026), T stage (OR 2.65, P = 0.037) and N stage (OR 2.34, P = 0.001) in resectable pancreatic cancer. Patients with positive peritoneal cytology demonstrated poor overall survival (OS; HR 3.18, P = 0.000) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR 2.88, P = 0.000) times. Based on our meta-analysis, we conclude that positive peritoneal cytology is an indicator of advanced stage pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis; hence, radical resection should not be performed on these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5362462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53624622017-04-24 Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis Cao, Feng Li, Jia Li, Ang Li, Fei Oncotarget Research Paper Although peritoneal cytology has been used to determine pancreatic cancer staging for more than three decades, its prognostic significance in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer is inconclusive. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the impact of peritoneal cytology status on the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Ten studies were identified for this meta-analysis after searching the PubMed, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic databases. Our results showed that positive peritoneal cytology was associated with tumor size (OR 11.65, P = 0.001), tumor location (OR 0.37, P = 0.000), serosal invasion (OR 3.89, P = 0.000), portal vein invasion (OR 1.82, P = 0.016), lymph vessel invasion (OR 2.71, P = 0.026), T stage (OR 2.65, P = 0.037) and N stage (OR 2.34, P = 0.001) in resectable pancreatic cancer. Patients with positive peritoneal cytology demonstrated poor overall survival (OS; HR 3.18, P = 0.000) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR 2.88, P = 0.000) times. Based on our meta-analysis, we conclude that positive peritoneal cytology is an indicator of advanced stage pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis; hence, radical resection should not be performed on these patients. Impact Journals LLC 2017-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5362462/ /pubmed/28122342 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14745 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Cao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Cao, Feng Li, Jia Li, Ang Li, Fei Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5362462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122342 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caofeng prognosticsignificanceofpositiveperitonealcytologyinresectablepancreaticcancerasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijia prognosticsignificanceofpositiveperitonealcytologyinresectablepancreaticcancerasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liang prognosticsignificanceofpositiveperitonealcytologyinresectablepancreaticcancerasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lifei prognosticsignificanceofpositiveperitonealcytologyinresectablepancreaticcancerasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis |