Cargando…

Comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: to test the effects of a behavioral, an educative and a comparative intervention on women's adherence to the return appointment to receive the pap test report. METHODS: randomized controlled clinical trial at a Primary Health Care Service, involving three groups: EG (educative sessio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira Moreira, Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra, Nicolau, Ana Izabel Oliveira, Lima, Thaís Marques, Barbosa, Denise de Fátima Fernandes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1337.2857
_version_ 1782517143207673856
author Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira Moreira
Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra
Nicolau, Ana Izabel Oliveira
Lima, Thaís Marques
Barbosa, Denise de Fátima Fernandes
author_facet Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira Moreira
Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra
Nicolau, Ana Izabel Oliveira
Lima, Thaís Marques
Barbosa, Denise de Fátima Fernandes
author_sort Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira Moreira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to test the effects of a behavioral, an educative and a comparative intervention on women's adherence to the return appointment to receive the pap test report. METHODS: randomized controlled clinical trial at a Primary Health Care Service, involving three groups: EG (educative session and test demonstration), BG (recall ribbon) and standard intervention (card containing the return appointment - graphical reminder), called comparative group here (CG). To select the sample, the following was established: having started sexual activity and undergoing the pap smear during the study, resulting in 775 women. RESULTS: among the 775 women, 585 (75.5%) returned to receive the test result within 65 days. The educative group presented the highest return rate (EG=82%/CG=77%/BG=66%), statistically significant only when compared to the behavioral group (p=0.000). The educative group obtained the smallest interval (p<0.05) concerning the mean number of days of return to receive the test result (EG:M=43days/BG:M=47.5days/CG:M=44.8 days). CONCLUSION: the educative group reached higher return rates and the women returned earlier, but the behavioral intervention showed to be the least effective. Brazilian Clinical Trial Register: RBR-93ykhs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5363331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53633312017-04-03 Comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira Moreira Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra Nicolau, Ana Izabel Oliveira Lima, Thaís Marques Barbosa, Denise de Fátima Fernandes Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to test the effects of a behavioral, an educative and a comparative intervention on women's adherence to the return appointment to receive the pap test report. METHODS: randomized controlled clinical trial at a Primary Health Care Service, involving three groups: EG (educative session and test demonstration), BG (recall ribbon) and standard intervention (card containing the return appointment - graphical reminder), called comparative group here (CG). To select the sample, the following was established: having started sexual activity and undergoing the pap smear during the study, resulting in 775 women. RESULTS: among the 775 women, 585 (75.5%) returned to receive the test result within 65 days. The educative group presented the highest return rate (EG=82%/CG=77%/BG=66%), statistically significant only when compared to the behavioral group (p=0.000). The educative group obtained the smallest interval (p<0.05) concerning the mean number of days of return to receive the test result (EG:M=43days/BG:M=47.5days/CG:M=44.8 days). CONCLUSION: the educative group reached higher return rates and the women returned earlier, but the behavioral intervention showed to be the least effective. Brazilian Clinical Trial Register: RBR-93ykhs. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5363331/ /pubmed/28301035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1337.2857 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira Moreira
Pinheiro, Ana Karina Bezerra
Nicolau, Ana Izabel Oliveira
Lima, Thaís Marques
Barbosa, Denise de Fátima Fernandes
Comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial
title Comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort comparison among the efficacy of interventions for the return rate to receive the pap test report: randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1337.2857
work_keys_str_mv AT vasconceloscamilateixeiramoreira comparisonamongtheefficacyofinterventionsforthereturnratetoreceivethepaptestreportrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT pinheiroanakarinabezerra comparisonamongtheefficacyofinterventionsforthereturnratetoreceivethepaptestreportrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT nicolauanaizabeloliveira comparisonamongtheefficacyofinterventionsforthereturnratetoreceivethepaptestreportrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT limathaismarques comparisonamongtheefficacyofinterventionsforthereturnratetoreceivethepaptestreportrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT barbosadenisedefatimafernandes comparisonamongtheefficacyofinterventionsforthereturnratetoreceivethepaptestreportrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial