Cargando…

Effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – An implicit priming study

BACKGROUND: Expectancy is widely accepted as a key contributor to placebo effects. However, it is not known whether non‐conscious expectancies achieved through semantic priming may contribute to placebo analgesia. In this study, we investigated if an implicit priming procedure, where participants we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosén, A., Yi, J., Kirsch, I., Kaptchuk, T.J., Ingvar, M., Jensen, K.B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.961
_version_ 1782517155090137088
author Rosén, A.
Yi, J.
Kirsch, I.
Kaptchuk, T.J.
Ingvar, M.
Jensen, K.B.
author_facet Rosén, A.
Yi, J.
Kirsch, I.
Kaptchuk, T.J.
Ingvar, M.
Jensen, K.B.
author_sort Rosén, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Expectancy is widely accepted as a key contributor to placebo effects. However, it is not known whether non‐conscious expectancies achieved through semantic priming may contribute to placebo analgesia. In this study, we investigated if an implicit priming procedure, where participants were unaware of the intended priming influence, affected placebo analgesia. METHODS: In a double‐blind experiment, healthy participants (n = 36) were randomized to different implicit priming types; one aimed at increasing positive expectations and one neutral control condition. First, pain calibration (thermal) and a credibility demonstration of the placebo analgesic device were performed. In a second step, an independent experimenter administered the priming task; Scrambled Sentence Test. Then, pain sensitivity was assessed while telling participants that the analgesic device was either turned on (placebo) or turned off (baseline). Pain responses were recorded on a 0–100 Numeric Response Scale. RESULTS: Overall, there was a significant placebo effect (p < 0.001), however, the priming conditions (positive/neutral) did not lead to differences in placebo outcome. Prior experience of pain relief (during initial pain testing) correlated significantly with placebo analgesia (p < 0.001) and explained 34% of placebo variance. Trait neuroticism correlated positively with placebo analgesia (p < 0.05) and explained 21% of placebo variance. CONCLUSIONS: Priming is one of many ways to influence behaviour, and non‐conscious activation of positive expectations could theoretically affect placebo analgesia. Yet, we found no SST priming effect on placebo analgesia. Instead, our data point to the significance of prior experience of pain relief, trait neuroticism and social interaction with the treating clinician. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings challenge the role of semantic priming as a behavioural modifier that may shape expectations of pain relief, and affect placebo analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5363385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53633852017-04-06 Effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – An implicit priming study Rosén, A. Yi, J. Kirsch, I. Kaptchuk, T.J. Ingvar, M. Jensen, K.B. Eur J Pain Original Research BACKGROUND: Expectancy is widely accepted as a key contributor to placebo effects. However, it is not known whether non‐conscious expectancies achieved through semantic priming may contribute to placebo analgesia. In this study, we investigated if an implicit priming procedure, where participants were unaware of the intended priming influence, affected placebo analgesia. METHODS: In a double‐blind experiment, healthy participants (n = 36) were randomized to different implicit priming types; one aimed at increasing positive expectations and one neutral control condition. First, pain calibration (thermal) and a credibility demonstration of the placebo analgesic device were performed. In a second step, an independent experimenter administered the priming task; Scrambled Sentence Test. Then, pain sensitivity was assessed while telling participants that the analgesic device was either turned on (placebo) or turned off (baseline). Pain responses were recorded on a 0–100 Numeric Response Scale. RESULTS: Overall, there was a significant placebo effect (p < 0.001), however, the priming conditions (positive/neutral) did not lead to differences in placebo outcome. Prior experience of pain relief (during initial pain testing) correlated significantly with placebo analgesia (p < 0.001) and explained 34% of placebo variance. Trait neuroticism correlated positively with placebo analgesia (p < 0.05) and explained 21% of placebo variance. CONCLUSIONS: Priming is one of many ways to influence behaviour, and non‐conscious activation of positive expectations could theoretically affect placebo analgesia. Yet, we found no SST priming effect on placebo analgesia. Instead, our data point to the significance of prior experience of pain relief, trait neuroticism and social interaction with the treating clinician. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings challenge the role of semantic priming as a behavioural modifier that may shape expectations of pain relief, and affect placebo analgesia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-17 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5363385/ /pubmed/27748563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.961 Text en © 2016 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC®. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rosén, A.
Yi, J.
Kirsch, I.
Kaptchuk, T.J.
Ingvar, M.
Jensen, K.B.
Effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – An implicit priming study
title Effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – An implicit priming study
title_full Effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – An implicit priming study
title_fullStr Effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – An implicit priming study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – An implicit priming study
title_short Effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – An implicit priming study
title_sort effects of subtle cognitive manipulations on placebo analgesia – an implicit priming study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.961
work_keys_str_mv AT rosena effectsofsubtlecognitivemanipulationsonplaceboanalgesiaanimplicitprimingstudy
AT yij effectsofsubtlecognitivemanipulationsonplaceboanalgesiaanimplicitprimingstudy
AT kirschi effectsofsubtlecognitivemanipulationsonplaceboanalgesiaanimplicitprimingstudy
AT kaptchuktj effectsofsubtlecognitivemanipulationsonplaceboanalgesiaanimplicitprimingstudy
AT ingvarm effectsofsubtlecognitivemanipulationsonplaceboanalgesiaanimplicitprimingstudy
AT jensenkb effectsofsubtlecognitivemanipulationsonplaceboanalgesiaanimplicitprimingstudy