Cargando…

Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing trend toward transcending from traditional teaching to student-centered methodologies that actively engage students. We aimed to analyze students’ perceptions of effective interactive teaching using PollEverywhere Audience Response System (ARS) as a worthwhile teac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdel Meguid, Eiman, Collins, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28360541
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S131851
_version_ 1782517247729729536
author Abdel Meguid, Eiman
Collins, Matthew
author_facet Abdel Meguid, Eiman
Collins, Matthew
author_sort Abdel Meguid, Eiman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an increasing trend toward transcending from traditional teaching to student-centered methodologies that actively engage students. We aimed to analyze students’ perceptions of effective interactive teaching using PollEverywhere Audience Response System (ARS) as a worthwhile teaching methodology. It can be of great help in maintaining students’ attention and in facilitating the lecturer to pick up students’ misunderstandings and correct them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This system was introduced to the undergraduate dental curriculum to increase student’s motivation and attention, giving immediate feedback on student understanding during an anatomy module. Computer science (CS) students who were more familiar with the use of this technology were also involved in the study for comparison and validation of the findings. The lecturer strategically inserted questions using PollEverywhere ARS. Students’ perception of the effective interactive teaching using this technology was evaluated statistically using a questionnaire and focus groups. RESULTS: It promoted interactivity, focused attention, and provided feedback on comprehension. A total of 95% reported that it increased their participation and found that it clarified their thinking and helped to focus on key points. Another 81.7% mentioned that it increased their motivation to learn. Students regarded it as a useful method for giving real-time feedback, which stimulated their performance and participation. Data from CS students echoed the findings from the dental students. Reports from focus groups demonstrated that this strategy was helpful in focusing students’ attention and in clarifying information. DISCUSSION: PollEverywhere encouraged all students to participate during the learning process. This has proven to be an effective tool for improving students’ understanding and critical thinking. CONCLUSION: Students regarded PollEverywhere as an effective teaching innovation that encouraged deeper ongoing retention of information. It was found to be an effective teaching aid in monitoring students’ progress and identifying deficiencies. This is of benefit in a module where interactivity is considered important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5364003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53640032017-03-30 Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching Abdel Meguid, Eiman Collins, Matthew Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: There is an increasing trend toward transcending from traditional teaching to student-centered methodologies that actively engage students. We aimed to analyze students’ perceptions of effective interactive teaching using PollEverywhere Audience Response System (ARS) as a worthwhile teaching methodology. It can be of great help in maintaining students’ attention and in facilitating the lecturer to pick up students’ misunderstandings and correct them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This system was introduced to the undergraduate dental curriculum to increase student’s motivation and attention, giving immediate feedback on student understanding during an anatomy module. Computer science (CS) students who were more familiar with the use of this technology were also involved in the study for comparison and validation of the findings. The lecturer strategically inserted questions using PollEverywhere ARS. Students’ perception of the effective interactive teaching using this technology was evaluated statistically using a questionnaire and focus groups. RESULTS: It promoted interactivity, focused attention, and provided feedback on comprehension. A total of 95% reported that it increased their participation and found that it clarified their thinking and helped to focus on key points. Another 81.7% mentioned that it increased their motivation to learn. Students regarded it as a useful method for giving real-time feedback, which stimulated their performance and participation. Data from CS students echoed the findings from the dental students. Reports from focus groups demonstrated that this strategy was helpful in focusing students’ attention and in clarifying information. DISCUSSION: PollEverywhere encouraged all students to participate during the learning process. This has proven to be an effective tool for improving students’ understanding and critical thinking. CONCLUSION: Students regarded PollEverywhere as an effective teaching innovation that encouraged deeper ongoing retention of information. It was found to be an effective teaching aid in monitoring students’ progress and identifying deficiencies. This is of benefit in a module where interactivity is considered important. Dove Medical Press 2017-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5364003/ /pubmed/28360541 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S131851 Text en © 2017 Abdel Meguid and Collins. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Abdel Meguid, Eiman
Collins, Matthew
Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching
title Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching
title_full Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching
title_fullStr Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching
title_full_unstemmed Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching
title_short Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching
title_sort students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28360541
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S131851
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelmeguideiman studentsperceptionsoflecturingapproachestraditionalversusinteractiveteaching
AT collinsmatthew studentsperceptionsoflecturingapproachestraditionalversusinteractiveteaching