Cargando…
Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft?
Autores principales: | Dashwood, Michael R., Loesch, Andrzej |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28350016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2017.66197 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft?
por: Krejca, Michał, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts
por: Węglarz, Przemysław, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Saphenous veins in coronary artery bypass grafting need external support
por: Samano, Ninos, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of
Choice for CABG in Brazil
por: Loesch, Andrzej, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
External stenting of saphenous vein bypass grafts does not affect intraoperative transit-time flow measurement
por: Depboylu, Burak Can, et al.
Publicado: (2015)