Cargando…
Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft?
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28344628 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2017.66199 |
| _version_ | 1782517298151555072 |
|---|---|
| author | Krejca, Michał Węglarz, Przemysław Trusz-Gluza, Maria Bochenek, Krystyna |
| author_facet | Krejca, Michał Węglarz, Przemysław Trusz-Gluza, Maria Bochenek, Krystyna |
| author_sort | Krejca, Michał |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-5364294 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-53642942017-03-24 Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft? Krejca, Michał Węglarz, Przemysław Trusz-Gluza, Maria Bochenek, Krystyna Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Rebuttal Termedia Publishing House 2017-03-10 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5364294/ /pubmed/28344628 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2017.66199 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
| spellingShingle | Rebuttal Krejca, Michał Węglarz, Przemysław Trusz-Gluza, Maria Bochenek, Krystyna Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft? |
| title | Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft? |
| title_full | Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft? |
| title_fullStr | Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft? |
| title_short | Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. Progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: Response to the Letter to the Editor: Neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. External stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft? |
| title_sort | neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. progress in medicine is good for the patient: why not use total arterial revascularization?: response to the letter to the editor: neointima development in externally stented saphenous vein grafts. external stents are bad for the patient: why not use an undamaged saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft? |
| topic | Rebuttal |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28344628 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2017.66199 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT krejcamichał neointimadevelopmentinexternallystentedsaphenousveingraftsprogressinmedicineisgoodforthepatientwhynotusetotalarterialrevascularizationresponsetothelettertotheeditorneointimadevelopmentinexternallystentedsaphenousveingraftsexternalstentsarebadforthepatient AT weglarzprzemysław neointimadevelopmentinexternallystentedsaphenousveingraftsprogressinmedicineisgoodforthepatientwhynotusetotalarterialrevascularizationresponsetothelettertotheeditorneointimadevelopmentinexternallystentedsaphenousveingraftsexternalstentsarebadforthepatient AT truszgluzamaria neointimadevelopmentinexternallystentedsaphenousveingraftsprogressinmedicineisgoodforthepatientwhynotusetotalarterialrevascularizationresponsetothelettertotheeditorneointimadevelopmentinexternallystentedsaphenousveingraftsexternalstentsarebadforthepatient AT bochenekkrystyna neointimadevelopmentinexternallystentedsaphenousveingraftsprogressinmedicineisgoodforthepatientwhynotusetotalarterialrevascularizationresponsetothelettertotheeditorneointimadevelopmentinexternallystentedsaphenousveingraftsexternalstentsarebadforthepatient |