Cargando…

Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners

BACKGROUND: In Australia, rural and remote communities have high rates of diabetes-related death and hospitalisation. General practitioners (GPs) play a major role in diabetes detection and management. Education of GPs could optimise diabetes management and improve patient outcomes at a population l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paul, Christine L., Piterman, Leon, Shaw, Jonathan E., Kirby, Catherine, Forshaw, Kristy L., Robinson, Jennifer, Thepwongsa, Isaraporn, Sanson-Fisher, Robert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1869-8
_version_ 1782517348440211456
author Paul, Christine L.
Piterman, Leon
Shaw, Jonathan E.
Kirby, Catherine
Forshaw, Kristy L.
Robinson, Jennifer
Thepwongsa, Isaraporn
Sanson-Fisher, Robert W.
author_facet Paul, Christine L.
Piterman, Leon
Shaw, Jonathan E.
Kirby, Catherine
Forshaw, Kristy L.
Robinson, Jennifer
Thepwongsa, Isaraporn
Sanson-Fisher, Robert W.
author_sort Paul, Christine L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Australia, rural and remote communities have high rates of diabetes-related death and hospitalisation. General practitioners (GPs) play a major role in diabetes detection and management. Education of GPs could optimise diabetes management and improve patient outcomes at a population level. The study aimed to describe the uptake of a continuing medical education intervention for rural GPs and its impact on the viability of a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effects of continuing medical education on whole-town diabetes monitoring and control. METHOD: Trial design: the cluster randomised controlled trial involved towns as the unit of allocation and analysis with outcomes assessed by de-identified pathology data (not reported here). The intervention programme consisted of an online active learning module, direct electronic access to specialist advice and performance feedback. Multiple rounds of invitation were used to engage GPs with the online intervention content. Evidence-based strategies (e.g. pre-notification, rewards, incentives) were incorporated into the invitations to enrol in the programme. Recruitment to the programme was electronically monitored through the hosting software package during the study intervention period. RESULTS: Eleven matched pairs of towns were included in the study. There were 146 GPs in the 11 intervention towns, of whom 34 (23.3%) enrolled in the programme, and 8 (5.5%) completed the online learning module. No town had more than 10% of the resident GPs complete the learning module. There were no contacts made by GPs regarding requests for specialist advice. Consequently, the trial was discontinued. CONCLUSION: There is an ongoing need to engage primary care physicians in improving diabetes monitoring and management in rural areas. Online training options, while notionally attractive and accessible, are not likely to have high levels of uptake, even when evidence-based recruitment strategies are implemented. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, identifier: ACTRN12611000553976. Retrospectively registered on 31 May 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5364574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53645742017-03-24 Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners Paul, Christine L. Piterman, Leon Shaw, Jonathan E. Kirby, Catherine Forshaw, Kristy L. Robinson, Jennifer Thepwongsa, Isaraporn Sanson-Fisher, Robert W. Trials Research BACKGROUND: In Australia, rural and remote communities have high rates of diabetes-related death and hospitalisation. General practitioners (GPs) play a major role in diabetes detection and management. Education of GPs could optimise diabetes management and improve patient outcomes at a population level. The study aimed to describe the uptake of a continuing medical education intervention for rural GPs and its impact on the viability of a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effects of continuing medical education on whole-town diabetes monitoring and control. METHOD: Trial design: the cluster randomised controlled trial involved towns as the unit of allocation and analysis with outcomes assessed by de-identified pathology data (not reported here). The intervention programme consisted of an online active learning module, direct electronic access to specialist advice and performance feedback. Multiple rounds of invitation were used to engage GPs with the online intervention content. Evidence-based strategies (e.g. pre-notification, rewards, incentives) were incorporated into the invitations to enrol in the programme. Recruitment to the programme was electronically monitored through the hosting software package during the study intervention period. RESULTS: Eleven matched pairs of towns were included in the study. There were 146 GPs in the 11 intervention towns, of whom 34 (23.3%) enrolled in the programme, and 8 (5.5%) completed the online learning module. No town had more than 10% of the resident GPs complete the learning module. There were no contacts made by GPs regarding requests for specialist advice. Consequently, the trial was discontinued. CONCLUSION: There is an ongoing need to engage primary care physicians in improving diabetes monitoring and management in rural areas. Online training options, while notionally attractive and accessible, are not likely to have high levels of uptake, even when evidence-based recruitment strategies are implemented. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, identifier: ACTRN12611000553976. Retrospectively registered on 31 May 2011. BioMed Central 2017-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5364574/ /pubmed/28335809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1869-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Paul, Christine L.
Piterman, Leon
Shaw, Jonathan E.
Kirby, Catherine
Forshaw, Kristy L.
Robinson, Jennifer
Thepwongsa, Isaraporn
Sanson-Fisher, Robert W.
Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners
title Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners
title_full Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners
title_fullStr Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners
title_short Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners
title_sort poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1869-8
work_keys_str_mv AT paulchristinel pooruptakeofanonlineinterventioninaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofonlinediabeteseducationforruralgeneralpractitioners
AT pitermanleon pooruptakeofanonlineinterventioninaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofonlinediabeteseducationforruralgeneralpractitioners
AT shawjonathane pooruptakeofanonlineinterventioninaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofonlinediabeteseducationforruralgeneralpractitioners
AT kirbycatherine pooruptakeofanonlineinterventioninaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofonlinediabeteseducationforruralgeneralpractitioners
AT forshawkristyl pooruptakeofanonlineinterventioninaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofonlinediabeteseducationforruralgeneralpractitioners
AT robinsonjennifer pooruptakeofanonlineinterventioninaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofonlinediabeteseducationforruralgeneralpractitioners
AT thepwongsaisaraporn pooruptakeofanonlineinterventioninaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofonlinediabeteseducationforruralgeneralpractitioners
AT sansonfisherrobertw pooruptakeofanonlineinterventioninaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofonlinediabeteseducationforruralgeneralpractitioners