Cargando…
Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare
BACKGROUND: The regret intensity scale (RIS) and the regret coping scale for healthcare professionals (RCS-HCP) working in hospitals assess the experience of care-related regrets and how healthcare professional deal with these negative events. The aim of this study was to validate a German version o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28340584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z |
_version_ | 1782517359384199168 |
---|---|
author | Richner, Silvia C. Cullati, Stéphane Cheval, Boris Schmidt, Ralph E. Chopard, Pierre Meier, Christoph A. Courvoisier, Delphine S. |
author_facet | Richner, Silvia C. Cullati, Stéphane Cheval, Boris Schmidt, Ralph E. Chopard, Pierre Meier, Christoph A. Courvoisier, Delphine S. |
author_sort | Richner, Silvia C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The regret intensity scale (RIS) and the regret coping scale for healthcare professionals (RCS-HCP) working in hospitals assess the experience of care-related regrets and how healthcare professional deal with these negative events. The aim of this study was to validate a German version of the RIS and the RCS-HCP. METHODS: The RIS and RCS-HCP in German were first translated into German (forward- and backward translations) and then pretested with 16 German-speaking healthcare professionals. Finally, two surveys (test and 1-month retest) administered the scales to a large sample of healthcare professionals from two different hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 2142 eligible healthcare professionals, 494 (23.1%) individuals (108 physicians) completed the cross-sectional web based survey and 244 completed the retest questionnaire. Participants (n = 165, 33.4% of the total sample) who reported not having experienced a regret in the last 5 years, had significantly more days of sick leave during the last 6 months. These participants were excluded from the subsequent analyses. The structure of the scales was similar to the French version with a single dimension for the regret intensity scale (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.88) and three types of coping strategies for the regret coping scale (alphas: 0.69 for problem-focused strategies, 0.67 for adaptive strategies and 0.86 for the maladaptive strategies). Construct validity was good and reproduced the findings of the French study, namely that higher regret intensity was associated with situations that entailed more consequences for the patients. Furthermore, higher regret intensity and more frequent use of maladaptive strategies were associated with more sleep difficulties and less work satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The German RIS and RCS-HCP scales were found valid for measuring regret intensity and regret coping in a population of healthcare professionals working in a hospital. Reporting no regret, which corresponds to the coping strategy of suppression, seems to be a maladaptive strategy because it was associated with more frequent sick day leaves. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5364621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53646212017-03-24 Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare Richner, Silvia C. Cullati, Stéphane Cheval, Boris Schmidt, Ralph E. Chopard, Pierre Meier, Christoph A. Courvoisier, Delphine S. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The regret intensity scale (RIS) and the regret coping scale for healthcare professionals (RCS-HCP) working in hospitals assess the experience of care-related regrets and how healthcare professional deal with these negative events. The aim of this study was to validate a German version of the RIS and the RCS-HCP. METHODS: The RIS and RCS-HCP in German were first translated into German (forward- and backward translations) and then pretested with 16 German-speaking healthcare professionals. Finally, two surveys (test and 1-month retest) administered the scales to a large sample of healthcare professionals from two different hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 2142 eligible healthcare professionals, 494 (23.1%) individuals (108 physicians) completed the cross-sectional web based survey and 244 completed the retest questionnaire. Participants (n = 165, 33.4% of the total sample) who reported not having experienced a regret in the last 5 years, had significantly more days of sick leave during the last 6 months. These participants were excluded from the subsequent analyses. The structure of the scales was similar to the French version with a single dimension for the regret intensity scale (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.88) and three types of coping strategies for the regret coping scale (alphas: 0.69 for problem-focused strategies, 0.67 for adaptive strategies and 0.86 for the maladaptive strategies). Construct validity was good and reproduced the findings of the French study, namely that higher regret intensity was associated with situations that entailed more consequences for the patients. Furthermore, higher regret intensity and more frequent use of maladaptive strategies were associated with more sleep difficulties and less work satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The German RIS and RCS-HCP scales were found valid for measuring regret intensity and regret coping in a population of healthcare professionals working in a hospital. Reporting no regret, which corresponds to the coping strategy of suppression, seems to be a maladaptive strategy because it was associated with more frequent sick day leaves. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5364621/ /pubmed/28340584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Richner, Silvia C. Cullati, Stéphane Cheval, Boris Schmidt, Ralph E. Chopard, Pierre Meier, Christoph A. Courvoisier, Delphine S. Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare |
title | Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare |
title_full | Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare |
title_fullStr | Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare |
title_short | Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare |
title_sort | validation of the german version of two scales (ris, rcs-hcp) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28340584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richnersilviac validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare AT cullatistephane validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare AT chevalboris validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare AT schmidtralphe validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare AT chopardpierre validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare AT meierchristopha validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare AT courvoisierdelphines validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare |