Cargando…

Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare

BACKGROUND: The regret intensity scale (RIS) and the regret coping scale for healthcare professionals (RCS-HCP) working in hospitals assess the experience of care-related regrets and how healthcare professional deal with these negative events. The aim of this study was to validate a German version o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richner, Silvia C., Cullati, Stéphane, Cheval, Boris, Schmidt, Ralph E., Chopard, Pierre, Meier, Christoph A., Courvoisier, Delphine S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28340584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z
_version_ 1782517359384199168
author Richner, Silvia C.
Cullati, Stéphane
Cheval, Boris
Schmidt, Ralph E.
Chopard, Pierre
Meier, Christoph A.
Courvoisier, Delphine S.
author_facet Richner, Silvia C.
Cullati, Stéphane
Cheval, Boris
Schmidt, Ralph E.
Chopard, Pierre
Meier, Christoph A.
Courvoisier, Delphine S.
author_sort Richner, Silvia C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The regret intensity scale (RIS) and the regret coping scale for healthcare professionals (RCS-HCP) working in hospitals assess the experience of care-related regrets and how healthcare professional deal with these negative events. The aim of this study was to validate a German version of the RIS and the RCS-HCP. METHODS: The RIS and RCS-HCP in German were first translated into German (forward- and backward translations) and then pretested with 16 German-speaking healthcare professionals. Finally, two surveys (test and 1-month retest) administered the scales to a large sample of healthcare professionals from two different hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 2142 eligible healthcare professionals, 494 (23.1%) individuals (108 physicians) completed the cross-sectional web based survey and 244 completed the retest questionnaire. Participants (n = 165, 33.4% of the total sample) who reported not having experienced a regret in the last 5 years, had significantly more days of sick leave during the last 6 months. These participants were excluded from the subsequent analyses. The structure of the scales was similar to the French version with a single dimension for the regret intensity scale (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.88) and three types of coping strategies for the regret coping scale (alphas: 0.69 for problem-focused strategies, 0.67 for adaptive strategies and 0.86 for the maladaptive strategies). Construct validity was good and reproduced the findings of the French study, namely that higher regret intensity was associated with situations that entailed more consequences for the patients. Furthermore, higher regret intensity and more frequent use of maladaptive strategies were associated with more sleep difficulties and less work satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The German RIS and RCS-HCP scales were found valid for measuring regret intensity and regret coping in a population of healthcare professionals working in a hospital. Reporting no regret, which corresponds to the coping strategy of suppression, seems to be a maladaptive strategy because it was associated with more frequent sick day leaves. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5364621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53646212017-03-24 Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare Richner, Silvia C. Cullati, Stéphane Cheval, Boris Schmidt, Ralph E. Chopard, Pierre Meier, Christoph A. Courvoisier, Delphine S. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The regret intensity scale (RIS) and the regret coping scale for healthcare professionals (RCS-HCP) working in hospitals assess the experience of care-related regrets and how healthcare professional deal with these negative events. The aim of this study was to validate a German version of the RIS and the RCS-HCP. METHODS: The RIS and RCS-HCP in German were first translated into German (forward- and backward translations) and then pretested with 16 German-speaking healthcare professionals. Finally, two surveys (test and 1-month retest) administered the scales to a large sample of healthcare professionals from two different hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 2142 eligible healthcare professionals, 494 (23.1%) individuals (108 physicians) completed the cross-sectional web based survey and 244 completed the retest questionnaire. Participants (n = 165, 33.4% of the total sample) who reported not having experienced a regret in the last 5 years, had significantly more days of sick leave during the last 6 months. These participants were excluded from the subsequent analyses. The structure of the scales was similar to the French version with a single dimension for the regret intensity scale (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.88) and three types of coping strategies for the regret coping scale (alphas: 0.69 for problem-focused strategies, 0.67 for adaptive strategies and 0.86 for the maladaptive strategies). Construct validity was good and reproduced the findings of the French study, namely that higher regret intensity was associated with situations that entailed more consequences for the patients. Furthermore, higher regret intensity and more frequent use of maladaptive strategies were associated with more sleep difficulties and less work satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The German RIS and RCS-HCP scales were found valid for measuring regret intensity and regret coping in a population of healthcare professionals working in a hospital. Reporting no regret, which corresponds to the coping strategy of suppression, seems to be a maladaptive strategy because it was associated with more frequent sick day leaves. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5364621/ /pubmed/28340584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Richner, Silvia C.
Cullati, Stéphane
Cheval, Boris
Schmidt, Ralph E.
Chopard, Pierre
Meier, Christoph A.
Courvoisier, Delphine S.
Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare
title Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare
title_full Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare
title_fullStr Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare
title_short Validation of the German version of two scales (RIS, RCS-HCP) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare
title_sort validation of the german version of two scales (ris, rcs-hcp) for measuring regret associated with providing healthcare
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28340584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0630-z
work_keys_str_mv AT richnersilviac validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare
AT cullatistephane validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare
AT chevalboris validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare
AT schmidtralphe validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare
AT chopardpierre validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare
AT meierchristopha validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare
AT courvoisierdelphines validationofthegermanversionoftwoscalesrisrcshcpformeasuringregretassociatedwithprovidinghealthcare