Cargando…
Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitoring in the presence and absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: BP was measured and compared in 71 randomly selected patients with AF and arterial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6 |
_version_ | 1782517383066288128 |
---|---|
author | Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja Barysienė, Jūratė Petrikonytė, Dovilė Aidietis, Audrius Marinskis, Germanas Laucevičius, Aleksandras |
author_facet | Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja Barysienė, Jūratė Petrikonytė, Dovilė Aidietis, Audrius Marinskis, Germanas Laucevičius, Aleksandras |
author_sort | Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitoring in the presence and absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: BP was measured and compared in 71 randomly selected patients with AF and arterial hypertension diagnosis, 4 times each by auscultatory and oscillometric (Microlife BP A6 PC with AF detection system) methods. RESULTS: Study included 71 patients: 36 males (mean age 67.4 years) and 35 females (70.2 years). At the time of BP measuring procedure, 36 patients were in sinus rhythm (SR) and 35 in AF. In SR patients mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 132 ± 17.9 mmHg with auscultatory method (AM), 137.4 ± 19.4 mmHg with oscillometric method (OM); mean diastolic BP was 77.1 ± 10.9 mmHg (AM), 78.5 ± 12.2 mmHg (OM), in AF patients mean SBP was 127.5 ± 15.1 mmHg (AM), 133.6 ± 17.4 mmHg (OM); mean diastolic BP was 81.4 ± 9.9 mmHg (AM), 83.5 ± 11.8 mmHg (OM), p = 0.037. The averages of differences for SBP and DBP in sinus rhythm group were (−5.3 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −27.2 – 16.6)) and (−1.4 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −12.8 – 10.0)), respectively. In patients with AF the averages of differences for SBP and DBP were (−6.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −23.9 – 11.7)) and (−2.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −12.9 – 8.7)), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric device validated for patients with AF on average gives 5.3 mmHg higher systolic BP values for patients with SR and 6.3 mmHg higher BP values for patients with AF. However, the limits of agreement between two methods reveal wide range of random error rates which is a questionable topic in clinical practice, as it could possibly affect the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with AF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5364730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53647302017-03-28 Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja Barysienė, Jūratė Petrikonytė, Dovilė Aidietis, Audrius Marinskis, Germanas Laucevičius, Aleksandras BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitoring in the presence and absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: BP was measured and compared in 71 randomly selected patients with AF and arterial hypertension diagnosis, 4 times each by auscultatory and oscillometric (Microlife BP A6 PC with AF detection system) methods. RESULTS: Study included 71 patients: 36 males (mean age 67.4 years) and 35 females (70.2 years). At the time of BP measuring procedure, 36 patients were in sinus rhythm (SR) and 35 in AF. In SR patients mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 132 ± 17.9 mmHg with auscultatory method (AM), 137.4 ± 19.4 mmHg with oscillometric method (OM); mean diastolic BP was 77.1 ± 10.9 mmHg (AM), 78.5 ± 12.2 mmHg (OM), in AF patients mean SBP was 127.5 ± 15.1 mmHg (AM), 133.6 ± 17.4 mmHg (OM); mean diastolic BP was 81.4 ± 9.9 mmHg (AM), 83.5 ± 11.8 mmHg (OM), p = 0.037. The averages of differences for SBP and DBP in sinus rhythm group were (−5.3 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −27.2 – 16.6)) and (−1.4 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −12.8 – 10.0)), respectively. In patients with AF the averages of differences for SBP and DBP were (−6.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −23.9 – 11.7)) and (−2.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −12.9 – 8.7)), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric device validated for patients with AF on average gives 5.3 mmHg higher systolic BP values for patients with SR and 6.3 mmHg higher BP values for patients with AF. However, the limits of agreement between two methods reveal wide range of random error rates which is a questionable topic in clinical practice, as it could possibly affect the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with AF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5364730/ /pubmed/28335730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja Barysienė, Jūratė Petrikonytė, Dovilė Aidietis, Audrius Marinskis, Germanas Laucevičius, Aleksandras Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension |
title | Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension |
title_full | Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension |
title_fullStr | Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension |
title_full_unstemmed | Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension |
title_short | Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension |
title_sort | auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT selmytebesuspareaisteja auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension AT barysienejurate auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension AT petrikonytedovile auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension AT aidietisaudrius auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension AT marinskisgermanas auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension AT lauceviciusaleksandras auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension |