Cargando…

Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitoring in the presence and absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: BP was measured and compared in 71 randomly selected patients with AF and arterial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja, Barysienė, Jūratė, Petrikonytė, Dovilė, Aidietis, Audrius, Marinskis, Germanas, Laucevičius, Aleksandras
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6
_version_ 1782517383066288128
author Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja
Barysienė, Jūratė
Petrikonytė, Dovilė
Aidietis, Audrius
Marinskis, Germanas
Laucevičius, Aleksandras
author_facet Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja
Barysienė, Jūratė
Petrikonytė, Dovilė
Aidietis, Audrius
Marinskis, Germanas
Laucevičius, Aleksandras
author_sort Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitoring in the presence and absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: BP was measured and compared in 71 randomly selected patients with AF and arterial hypertension diagnosis, 4 times each by auscultatory and oscillometric (Microlife BP A6 PC with AF detection system) methods. RESULTS: Study included 71 patients: 36 males (mean age 67.4 years) and 35 females (70.2 years). At the time of BP measuring procedure, 36 patients were in sinus rhythm (SR) and 35 in AF. In SR patients mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 132 ± 17.9 mmHg with auscultatory method (AM), 137.4 ± 19.4 mmHg with oscillometric method (OM); mean diastolic BP was 77.1 ± 10.9 mmHg (AM), 78.5 ± 12.2 mmHg (OM), in AF patients mean SBP was 127.5 ± 15.1 mmHg (AM), 133.6 ± 17.4 mmHg (OM); mean diastolic BP was 81.4 ± 9.9 mmHg (AM), 83.5 ± 11.8 mmHg (OM), p = 0.037. The averages of differences for SBP and DBP in sinus rhythm group were (−5.3 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −27.2 – 16.6)) and (−1.4 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −12.8 – 10.0)), respectively. In patients with AF the averages of differences for SBP and DBP were (−6.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −23.9 – 11.7)) and (−2.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −12.9 – 8.7)), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric device validated for patients with AF on average gives 5.3 mmHg higher systolic BP values for patients with SR and 6.3 mmHg higher BP values for patients with AF. However, the limits of agreement between two methods reveal wide range of random error rates which is a questionable topic in clinical practice, as it could possibly affect the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with AF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5364730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53647302017-03-28 Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja Barysienė, Jūratė Petrikonytė, Dovilė Aidietis, Audrius Marinskis, Germanas Laucevičius, Aleksandras BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitoring in the presence and absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: BP was measured and compared in 71 randomly selected patients with AF and arterial hypertension diagnosis, 4 times each by auscultatory and oscillometric (Microlife BP A6 PC with AF detection system) methods. RESULTS: Study included 71 patients: 36 males (mean age 67.4 years) and 35 females (70.2 years). At the time of BP measuring procedure, 36 patients were in sinus rhythm (SR) and 35 in AF. In SR patients mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 132 ± 17.9 mmHg with auscultatory method (AM), 137.4 ± 19.4 mmHg with oscillometric method (OM); mean diastolic BP was 77.1 ± 10.9 mmHg (AM), 78.5 ± 12.2 mmHg (OM), in AF patients mean SBP was 127.5 ± 15.1 mmHg (AM), 133.6 ± 17.4 mmHg (OM); mean diastolic BP was 81.4 ± 9.9 mmHg (AM), 83.5 ± 11.8 mmHg (OM), p = 0.037. The averages of differences for SBP and DBP in sinus rhythm group were (−5.3 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −27.2 – 16.6)) and (−1.4 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −12.8 – 10.0)), respectively. In patients with AF the averages of differences for SBP and DBP were (−6.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −23.9 – 11.7)) and (−2.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement −12.9 – 8.7)), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric device validated for patients with AF on average gives 5.3 mmHg higher systolic BP values for patients with SR and 6.3 mmHg higher BP values for patients with AF. However, the limits of agreement between two methods reveal wide range of random error rates which is a questionable topic in clinical practice, as it could possibly affect the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with AF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5364730/ /pubmed/28335730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Šelmytė–Besusparė, Aistėja
Barysienė, Jūratė
Petrikonytė, Dovilė
Aidietis, Audrius
Marinskis, Germanas
Laucevičius, Aleksandras
Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension
title Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension
title_full Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension
title_fullStr Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension
title_short Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension
title_sort auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5364730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0521-6
work_keys_str_mv AT selmytebesuspareaisteja auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension
AT barysienejurate auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension
AT petrikonytedovile auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension
AT aidietisaudrius auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension
AT marinskisgermanas auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension
AT lauceviciusaleksandras auscultatoryversusoscillometricbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationandarterialhypertension