Cargando…
Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Family interventions for psychosis (FIp) are effective in reducing service user relapse and carer distress in people with schizophrenia-spectrum conditions. Several treatment and best practice guidelines recommend FIp for all people with schizophrenia. However, outcome findings in relation to early...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5366348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28396643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00371 |
_version_ | 1782517574376882176 |
---|---|
author | Claxton, Melanie Onwumere, Juliana Fornells-Ambrojo, Miriam |
author_facet | Claxton, Melanie Onwumere, Juliana Fornells-Ambrojo, Miriam |
author_sort | Claxton, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Family interventions for psychosis (FIp) are effective in reducing service user relapse and carer distress in people with schizophrenia-spectrum conditions. Several treatment and best practice guidelines recommend FIp for all people with schizophrenia. However, outcome findings in relation to early psychosis groups have been inconsistent. The current paper reports a systematic review and meta-analyses of articles that evaluated FIp in early psychosis with a clearly defined comparison group. A combination of electronic database searches (using PsychINFO, Medline, and CENTRAL), citation searches and hand searches of key journals and reviews was conducted. Peer-reviewed articles published in English from database inception to June 2016 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP). Seventeen papers from 14 studies met inclusion criteria for review, the overall quality of which was moderate. Meta-analytic synthesis showed that FIp improved service user functioning and reduced the likelihood of relapse by the end of treatment. Psychotic symptoms were significantly reduced in the FIp group at follow up, but this was not evident at end of treatment. In terms of FIp target mechanisms, carers receiving FIp were more likely to shift from high to low expressed emotion and less likely to report patient focused criticism or engage in conflict communication than carers randomized to standard care. Carer burden and well-being were improved by the end of treatment but gains were not sustained at follow up. FIp had no impact on carer emotional over-involvement. The findings indicate that FIp is an effective intervention for early psychosis service users and their relatives. However, further research is required to establish which key therapeutic components of FIp are most effective for whom, in addition to understanding the mechanisms by which FIp might affect positive change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5366348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53663482017-04-10 Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Claxton, Melanie Onwumere, Juliana Fornells-Ambrojo, Miriam Front Psychol Psychology Family interventions for psychosis (FIp) are effective in reducing service user relapse and carer distress in people with schizophrenia-spectrum conditions. Several treatment and best practice guidelines recommend FIp for all people with schizophrenia. However, outcome findings in relation to early psychosis groups have been inconsistent. The current paper reports a systematic review and meta-analyses of articles that evaluated FIp in early psychosis with a clearly defined comparison group. A combination of electronic database searches (using PsychINFO, Medline, and CENTRAL), citation searches and hand searches of key journals and reviews was conducted. Peer-reviewed articles published in English from database inception to June 2016 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP). Seventeen papers from 14 studies met inclusion criteria for review, the overall quality of which was moderate. Meta-analytic synthesis showed that FIp improved service user functioning and reduced the likelihood of relapse by the end of treatment. Psychotic symptoms were significantly reduced in the FIp group at follow up, but this was not evident at end of treatment. In terms of FIp target mechanisms, carers receiving FIp were more likely to shift from high to low expressed emotion and less likely to report patient focused criticism or engage in conflict communication than carers randomized to standard care. Carer burden and well-being were improved by the end of treatment but gains were not sustained at follow up. FIp had no impact on carer emotional over-involvement. The findings indicate that FIp is an effective intervention for early psychosis service users and their relatives. However, further research is required to establish which key therapeutic components of FIp are most effective for whom, in addition to understanding the mechanisms by which FIp might affect positive change. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5366348/ /pubmed/28396643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00371 Text en Copyright © 2017 Claxton, Onwumere and Fornells-Ambrojo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Claxton, Melanie Onwumere, Juliana Fornells-Ambrojo, Miriam Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | do family interventions improve outcomes in early psychosis? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5366348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28396643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claxtonmelanie dofamilyinterventionsimproveoutcomesinearlypsychosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT onwumerejuliana dofamilyinterventionsimproveoutcomesinearlypsychosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fornellsambrojomiriam dofamilyinterventionsimproveoutcomesinearlypsychosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |