Cargando…
The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) can be assessed by accelerometer monitors. However, a high adherence to wearing this device is essential to obtain valid data. In this study, the influence of different wearing schemes and additional supportive phone calls (SPCs) on adherence was examined. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356721 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S129640 |
_version_ | 1782517774925430784 |
---|---|
author | van den Berg, Neeltje Ulbricht, Sabina Schwaneberg, Thea Weitmann, Kerstin Weymar, Franziska Groß, Stefan Dörr, Marcus Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_facet | van den Berg, Neeltje Ulbricht, Sabina Schwaneberg, Thea Weitmann, Kerstin Weymar, Franziska Groß, Stefan Dörr, Marcus Hoffmann, Wolfgang |
author_sort | van den Berg, Neeltje |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) can be assessed by accelerometer monitors. However, a high adherence to wearing this device is essential to obtain valid data. In this study, the influence of different wearing schemes and additional supportive phone calls (SPCs) on adherence was examined. METHODS: A randomized study with four groups was conducted in the context of a health examination program among participants aged 40–75 years without a history of cardiovascular diseases. Participants were recruited in different settings (general medical practices, job center, and health insurance). The participants were asked to wear an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days according to the wearing scheme “day and night” or “day only” and received or did not receive SPCs. Full adherence was defined as a total wearing time of 98 hours (between 8 am and 10 pm during 7 days). A generalized linear model was used to calculate the difference between the maximum possible and the observed adherence. RESULTS: Adherence could be assessed for 249 participants (mean age: 56.40 years; standard deviation [SD] 9.83, 40% males). The mean wearing time was 84.04 hours (SD 20.75). Participants with the wearing scheme day and night were significantly more adherent than participants with the wearing scheme day only (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.63; P=0.005). SPCs had no additional effect on adherence (IRR 0.80; P=0.168). CONCLUSION: To assess PA, the wearing scheme day and night provides the best possible adherence in this group of participants. Further studies are necessary to examine adherence and the effects of additional SPCs in other samples or settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5367450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53674502017-03-29 The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial van den Berg, Neeltje Ulbricht, Sabina Schwaneberg, Thea Weitmann, Kerstin Weymar, Franziska Groß, Stefan Dörr, Marcus Hoffmann, Wolfgang Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) can be assessed by accelerometer monitors. However, a high adherence to wearing this device is essential to obtain valid data. In this study, the influence of different wearing schemes and additional supportive phone calls (SPCs) on adherence was examined. METHODS: A randomized study with four groups was conducted in the context of a health examination program among participants aged 40–75 years without a history of cardiovascular diseases. Participants were recruited in different settings (general medical practices, job center, and health insurance). The participants were asked to wear an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days according to the wearing scheme “day and night” or “day only” and received or did not receive SPCs. Full adherence was defined as a total wearing time of 98 hours (between 8 am and 10 pm during 7 days). A generalized linear model was used to calculate the difference between the maximum possible and the observed adherence. RESULTS: Adherence could be assessed for 249 participants (mean age: 56.40 years; standard deviation [SD] 9.83, 40% males). The mean wearing time was 84.04 hours (SD 20.75). Participants with the wearing scheme day and night were significantly more adherent than participants with the wearing scheme day only (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.63; P=0.005). SPCs had no additional effect on adherence (IRR 0.80; P=0.168). CONCLUSION: To assess PA, the wearing scheme day and night provides the best possible adherence in this group of participants. Further studies are necessary to examine adherence and the effects of additional SPCs in other samples or settings. Dove Medical Press 2017-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5367450/ /pubmed/28356721 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S129640 Text en © 2017 van den Berg et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research van den Berg, Neeltje Ulbricht, Sabina Schwaneberg, Thea Weitmann, Kerstin Weymar, Franziska Groß, Stefan Dörr, Marcus Hoffmann, Wolfgang The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial |
title | The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356721 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S129640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbergneeltje theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ulbrichtsabina theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schwanebergthea theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weitmannkerstin theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weymarfranziska theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT großstefan theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dorrmarcus theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoffmannwolfgang theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenbergneeltje influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ulbrichtsabina influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schwanebergthea influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weitmannkerstin influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weymarfranziska influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT großstefan influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dorrmarcus influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoffmannwolfgang influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |