Cargando…

The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) can be assessed by accelerometer monitors. However, a high adherence to wearing this device is essential to obtain valid data. In this study, the influence of different wearing schemes and additional supportive phone calls (SPCs) on adherence was examined. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Berg, Neeltje, Ulbricht, Sabina, Schwaneberg, Thea, Weitmann, Kerstin, Weymar, Franziska, Groß, Stefan, Dörr, Marcus, Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356721
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S129640
_version_ 1782517774925430784
author van den Berg, Neeltje
Ulbricht, Sabina
Schwaneberg, Thea
Weitmann, Kerstin
Weymar, Franziska
Groß, Stefan
Dörr, Marcus
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
author_facet van den Berg, Neeltje
Ulbricht, Sabina
Schwaneberg, Thea
Weitmann, Kerstin
Weymar, Franziska
Groß, Stefan
Dörr, Marcus
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
author_sort van den Berg, Neeltje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) can be assessed by accelerometer monitors. However, a high adherence to wearing this device is essential to obtain valid data. In this study, the influence of different wearing schemes and additional supportive phone calls (SPCs) on adherence was examined. METHODS: A randomized study with four groups was conducted in the context of a health examination program among participants aged 40–75 years without a history of cardiovascular diseases. Participants were recruited in different settings (general medical practices, job center, and health insurance). The participants were asked to wear an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days according to the wearing scheme “day and night” or “day only” and received or did not receive SPCs. Full adherence was defined as a total wearing time of 98 hours (between 8 am and 10 pm during 7 days). A generalized linear model was used to calculate the difference between the maximum possible and the observed adherence. RESULTS: Adherence could be assessed for 249 participants (mean age: 56.40 years; standard deviation [SD] 9.83, 40% males). The mean wearing time was 84.04 hours (SD 20.75). Participants with the wearing scheme day and night were significantly more adherent than participants with the wearing scheme day only (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.63; P=0.005). SPCs had no additional effect on adherence (IRR 0.80; P=0.168). CONCLUSION: To assess PA, the wearing scheme day and night provides the best possible adherence in this group of participants. Further studies are necessary to examine adherence and the effects of additional SPCs in other samples or settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5367450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53674502017-03-29 The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial van den Berg, Neeltje Ulbricht, Sabina Schwaneberg, Thea Weitmann, Kerstin Weymar, Franziska Groß, Stefan Dörr, Marcus Hoffmann, Wolfgang Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) can be assessed by accelerometer monitors. However, a high adherence to wearing this device is essential to obtain valid data. In this study, the influence of different wearing schemes and additional supportive phone calls (SPCs) on adherence was examined. METHODS: A randomized study with four groups was conducted in the context of a health examination program among participants aged 40–75 years without a history of cardiovascular diseases. Participants were recruited in different settings (general medical practices, job center, and health insurance). The participants were asked to wear an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days according to the wearing scheme “day and night” or “day only” and received or did not receive SPCs. Full adherence was defined as a total wearing time of 98 hours (between 8 am and 10 pm during 7 days). A generalized linear model was used to calculate the difference between the maximum possible and the observed adherence. RESULTS: Adherence could be assessed for 249 participants (mean age: 56.40 years; standard deviation [SD] 9.83, 40% males). The mean wearing time was 84.04 hours (SD 20.75). Participants with the wearing scheme day and night were significantly more adherent than participants with the wearing scheme day only (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.63; P=0.005). SPCs had no additional effect on adherence (IRR 0.80; P=0.168). CONCLUSION: To assess PA, the wearing scheme day and night provides the best possible adherence in this group of participants. Further studies are necessary to examine adherence and the effects of additional SPCs in other samples or settings. Dove Medical Press 2017-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5367450/ /pubmed/28356721 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S129640 Text en © 2017 van den Berg et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
van den Berg, Neeltje
Ulbricht, Sabina
Schwaneberg, Thea
Weitmann, Kerstin
Weymar, Franziska
Groß, Stefan
Dörr, Marcus
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial
title The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial
title_full The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial
title_short The influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort influence of wearing schemes and supportive telephone calls on adherence in accelerometry measurement: results of a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5367450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28356721
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S129640
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbergneeltje theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ulbrichtsabina theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schwanebergthea theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weitmannkerstin theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weymarfranziska theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT großstefan theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dorrmarcus theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hoffmannwolfgang theinfluenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenbergneeltje influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ulbrichtsabina influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schwanebergthea influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weitmannkerstin influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weymarfranziska influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT großstefan influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dorrmarcus influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hoffmannwolfgang influenceofwearingschemesandsupportivetelephonecallsonadherenceinaccelerometrymeasurementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial